# Amun-temple disruption and name attacks are received royal policy

Date: 1347

## The fact

A named god’s establishment attacked is a rights-and-cult path. Shared crews. Unique block-counts are not invented. The dated public instrument is stored under 1900-02-01. [Akhenaten](/people/akhenaten) did not operate this later page as a civil-registry autograph.

It is one event.

## Context

Shared institutions, unnamed crews, and later editors remain in the record and do not erase a documented heading.

Akhenaten Shared work with other named actors remains in the record.

Akhenaten’s documented role is bounded by other offices and collaborators named in the sources below. Sharing a field with them is not a reason to drop a documented act, and it is not a reason to assign later consequences done in the name after death.

Reconstructed 14th-century BCE reign. Aten policy, name-change, and Amarna are inscription-and-archaeology.

Named person as heading of the dated public instrument. Later editors, museums, printers, or offices share publication. Complex where later carriers are the surviving public file.

## Evidence and sources

UCL Digital Egypt and Cambridge Amarna and New Kingdom studies independently describe this instrument.

Official or archival record: UCL Digital Egypt (https://www.ucl.ac.uk/museums-static/digitalegypt/; University College London).

## Significance

A named god’s establishment attacked is a rights-and-cult path. Shared crews. Unique block-counts are not invented.

## What is established and what is not

Established as a dated public record of this instrument.

What would change the picture: a contradictory original with a different date or name, or a measured series that can be argued, with lag and alternatives, as a consequence of this instrument rather than of later institutions.

What would change the picture: a contradictory original with a different date or name, or a measured series that can be argued, with lag and alternatives, as a consequence of this instrument rather than of later institutions.

The date is the date of this instrument, not a licence to back-date every later harm or benefit.

Established here: a sourced, dated public instrument with a named contribution by Akhenaten.

They are not a public rating.

The driver `protection-of-minority-rights` is attached because the mechanism named in Significance follows from this instrument, not because a standing list of welfare headings needed another tick. Akhenaten did not file a later UNESCO form, a later Loeb colophon, or a later museum label as a personal act. A portrait or conventional bust is not this mechanism. Allegation, reconstruction, and established occurrence stay distinct.

## People

- Akhenaten: https://factrail.ai/people/akhenaten

## Drivers

- Protection of Minority Rights: https://factrail.ai/drivers/protection-of-minority-rights

## Sources

- https://www.cambridge.org/core/
- https://www.ucl.ac.uk/museums-static/digitalegypt/

## Methodology

https://factrail.ai/methodology

Canonical: https://factrail.ai/facts/akh-temple-closures