# Later Roman narrative prints her as a usable sexual-political file in enemy oratory

Date: 1920

## The fact

[Plutarch](/people/plutarch)-in-English and later Roman-tradition pages print intimate slander as public politics. The dated carrier is that modern English of a hostile tradition. A queen’s body as a file is a personal-data path in the sense of non-consensual publicity, not GDPR.

## Context

Coins are her official face.

[Cleopatra](/people/cleopatra) is not the sole author of every later object, law, or museum label that uses the name. Shared work with courts, excavators, printers, spouses, officials, and later states does not erase a documented role, and it does not make an ancient person the signer of a twentieth-century statute.

## Evidence and sources

Official museum, UNESCO, or edition pages and an independent publisher independently describe this instrument.

Official or archival record: Perseus — Plutarch, Antony (https://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus:text:2008.01.0007; Perseus Digital Library / Tufts).

## Significance

Printed slander-tradition is a personal-file path, not a recovered diary.

Printed slander-tradition is a personal-file path, not a recovered diary.

## What is established and what is not

Established as a dated public record of this instrument.

What would change the picture: a contradictory original with a different date or name, or a measured series that can be argued, with lag and alternatives, as a consequence of this instrument rather than of later institutions.

The date is the date of this instrument, not a licence to back-date every later harm or benefit.

## People

- Cleopatra: https://factrail.ai/people/cleopatra

## Drivers

- Personal-Data Protection: https://factrail.ai/drivers/personal-data-protection

## Sources

- https://doi.org/10.1017/ccol0521828791
- https://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus:text:2008.01.0007

## Methodology

https://factrail.ai/methodology

Canonical: https://factrail.ai/facts/cl-personal-roman-files