# The Descent of Man (1871) argues human common descent as a dated public treatise, twin of the ranking-passages cost row

Date: 1871

## The fact

In 1871 The Descent of Man argued human common descent as a public treatise. Charles Darwin's documented role is: He wrote the 1871 book. Huxley and others already argued human evolution in public. Ranking passages remain the inequality cost twin, not mixed as a rebate here.

## Context

The ranking row stores inequality cost of the same book. This stores the common-descent teaching. Sharing Huxley as a prior public advocate is required. The setting of The Descent of Man (1871) argues human common descent as a dated public treatise, twin of the ranking-passages cost row is the public file around 1871-02-24. Shared offices, unnamed crews, printers, or later editors may appear without becoming this instrument. Driver edu-[digital-learning-access](/drivers/edu-digital-learning-access) is attached because the significance names a mechanism from this act, not because a standing list needed coverage.

If a number is not in the two records named above, it is not supplied here.

## Evidence and sources

Official locator: Project Gutenberg — Darwin, The Descent of Man at https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/2300 (Project Gutenberg). Independent locator: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy — Darwin, Descent neighbourhood at https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/darwinism/ (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy). Official carrier: Project Gutenberg — Darwin, The Descent of Man (https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/2300; Project Gutenberg). Independent carrier: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy — Darwin, Descent neighbourhood (https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/darwinism/; Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy).

Official or archival record: Project Gutenberg — Darwin, The Descent of Man (https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/2300; Project Gutenberg).

## Significance

Improving path from The Descent of Man (1871) argues human common descent as a dated public treatise, twin of the ranking-passages cost row on 1871-02-24. A public treatise placing humans inside common descent is an education path of high weight. One book, two signs on two rows. The welfare reading on this path is improving.

Later competitions, monuments, translations, UNESCO listings, museums, and adaptations are not converted into extra lifetime acts.

## What is established and what is not

Established: a sourced public record of The Descent of Man (1871) argues human common descent as a dated public treatise, twin of the ranking-passages cost row under 1871-02-24 for Charles Darwin. Established: a sourced public record of The Descent of Man (1871) argues human common descent as a dated public treatise, twin of the ranking-passages cost row under 1871-02-24.

The welfare reading used in this dossier is improving. That reading is an impact-path choice, not a property stored on the Fact itself.

Confidence is stated on the impact path, not hidden in adjectives. Do not merge with the ranking-passages row. Sign lives on the path. Mixed effects of The Descent of Man (1871) argues human common descent as a dated public treatise, twin of the ranking-passages cost row are separate paths.

Shared responsibility is part of The Descent of Man (1871) argues human common descent as a dated public treatise, twin of the ranking-passages cost row. Naming Charles Darwin does not delete co-authors, institutions, or later transmitters. The lag from 1871-02-24 to any measured indicator is not treated as zero. Alternative explanations — weather, other armies, later statutes, or independent cultural change — remain live where the sources do not close them.

## People

- Charles Darwin: https://factrail.ai/people/charles-darwin

## Drivers

- Digital Learning Access: https://factrail.ai/drivers/edu-digital-learning-access

## Sources

- https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/darwinism/
- https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/2300

## Methodology

https://factrail.ai/methodology

Canonical: https://factrail.ai/facts/dar-descent-1871-edu