# A Writer’s Diary prints antisemitic civic passages in the 1870s

Date: 1877

## The fact

Dnevnik pisatelya, especially in the mid-1870s numbers (including 1876–77), prints passages on Jews as a civic-economic problem in the author’s conservative-national voice. It is not Karamazov and not the Pushkin speech. This catalog does not invent extra epithets beyond the public Diary.

## Context

Rights path: a famous monthly teaching hostility to a minority. Shared with the magazine’s readers. Mixed: the same Diary contains other civic essays. Those essays do not rebate these pages. Later Soviet or nationalist uses are reception.

Later competitions, monuments, translations, UNESCO listings, museums, and adaptations are not converted into extra lifetime acts.

## Evidence and sources

Britannica at https://www.britannica.com/biography/Fyodor-Dostoyevsky independently treats the later journalism. Goslitmuz at https://www.goslitmuz.ru/ is the official literary-museum neighbourhood of the Diary. Pushkin House at https://pushkinskijdom.ru/ is the academic neighbourhood.

Official or archival record: Britannica — Fyodor Dostoyevsky (https://www.britannica.com/biography/Fyodor-Dostoyevsky; Encyclopaedia Britannica).

## Significance

Printed antisemitism in a civic diary is a rights-harm path of high confidence and moderate weight. It is not a unique pogrom table attached here. Sourced, not slogan.

Confidence is stated on the impact path, not hidden in adjectives. Diary antisemitism is not the Pushkin speech and not a later film. Mixed effects of A Writer’s Diary prints antisemitic civic passages in the 1870s are separate paths.

## What is established and what is not

Established: antisemitic civic passages in the 1870s Diary. Not established: a unique circulation-times-harm coefficient. Distinct from Karamazov. Writer’s Diary 1876–77 cluster, civic Jewish question as hostility, sourced pages, not the 1880 hall. Official https://www.britannica.com/biography/Fyodor-Dostoyevsky is not independent https://www.goslitmuz.ru/. Later UNESCO listings and films are not this lifetime instrument. Writer’s Diary 1876–77 cluster, civic Jewish question as hostility, sourced pages, not the 1880 hall. Official https://www.britannica.com/biography/Fyodor-Dostoyevsky is not independent https://www.goslitmuz.ru/. Later UNESCO listings and films are not this lifetime instrument. Writer’s Diary 1876–77 cluster, civic Jewish question as hostility, sourced pages, not the 1880 hall. Official https://www.britannica.com/biography/Fyodor-Dostoyevsky is not independent https://www.goslitmuz.ru/. Later UNESCO listings and films are not this lifetime instrument.

Shared responsibility is part of A Writer’s Diary prints antisemitic civic passages in the 1870s. Naming Fyodor Dostoyevsky does not delete co-authors, institutions, or later transmitters. The lag from 1877-01-01 to any measured indicator is not treated as zero. Alternative explanations — weather, other armies, later statutes, or independent cultural change — remain live where the sources do not close them.

The contribution type is direct. The attached driver is [protection-of-minority-rights](/drivers/protection-of-minority-rights). The welfare reading used in this dossier is worsening. That reading is an impact-path choice, not a property stored on the Fact itself.

If a number is not in the two records named above, it is not supplied here.

## People

- Fyodor Dostoyevsky: https://factrail.ai/people/fyodor-dostoyevsky

## Drivers

- Protection of Minority Rights: https://factrail.ai/drivers/protection-of-minority-rights

## Sources

- https://www.britannica.com/biography/Fyodor-Dostoyevsky
- https://www.goslitmuz.ru/

## Methodology

https://factrail.ai/methodology

Canonical: https://factrail.ai/facts/dost-diary-antisemitism