# The 1559 settlement imposes uniformity and recusancy penalties Date: 1559 ## The fact Parliament and later official statute pages print Uniformity/Supremacy as church-state enforcement. Collective statute, royal assent. A penalty for worship is a rights path. The dated public instrument is stored under 1559-04-01. Elizabeth I did not operate this later page as a civil-registry autograph. It is one event. ## Context Shared institutions, unnamed crews, and later editors remain in the record and do not erase a documented heading. [Elizabeth I of England](/people/elizabeth-i-of-england) Shared work with other named actors remains in the record. Elizabeth I of England’s documented role is bounded by other offices and collaborators named in the sources below. Sharing a field with them is not a reason to drop a documented act, and it is not a reason to assign later consequences done in the name after death. Conventional reign is 1558–1603. Dated instruments are later statute calendars, National Archives catalogues, NPG portraits, RMG Armada pages, and encyclopedia lives. Named person as heading of the dated public instrument. Later editors, museums, printers, or offices share publication. Complex where later carriers are the surviving public file. ## Evidence and sources UK Parliament — later pages on Elizabethan statutes and monopolies and legislation.gov.uk — later official statute heritage independently describe this instrument. Official or archival record: UK Parliament — later pages on Elizabethan statutes and monopolies (https://www.parliament.uk/; UK Parliament). ## Significance Parliament and later official statute pages print Uniformity/Supremacy as church-state enforcement. Collective statute, royal assent. A penalty for worship is a rights path. ## What is established and what is not Established as a dated public record of this instrument. What would change the picture: a contradictory original with a different date or name, or a measured series that can be argued, with lag and alternatives, as a consequence of this instrument rather than of later institutions. What would change the picture: a contradictory original with a different date or name, or a measured series that can be argued, with lag and alternatives, as a consequence of this instrument rather than of later institutions. The date is the date of this instrument, not a licence to back-date every later harm or benefit. Established here: a sourced, dated public instrument with a named contribution by Elizabeth I of England. They are not a public rating. Driver `protection-of-minority-rights` is attached because the Significance sentence names a mechanism from The 1559 settlement imposes uniformity and recusancy penalties at 1559-05-08, not because a standing driver list needed coverage. Official page: https://www.parliament.uk/. Independent page: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/. ## People - Elizabeth I of England: https://factrail.ai/people/elizabeth-i-of-england ## Drivers - Protection of Minority Rights: https://factrail.ai/drivers/protection-of-minority-rights ## Sources - https://www.parliament.uk/ - https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ ## Methodology https://factrail.ai/methodology Canonical: https://factrail.ai/facts/e1-recusancy-penalties