# The 1935 EPR paper is a dated public quantum-completeness objection

Date: 1935

## The fact

In 1935 the EPR paper was Einstein's public quantum-completeness objection with Podolsky and Rosen. Later Bell tests are not this paper. Albert Einstein's documented role is: He co-authored EPR with Podolsky and Rosen. Bohr answered; later entanglement work is not 1935.

## Context

Physical Review printed. Sharing authorship with Podolsky and Rosen is required. The setting of The 1935 EPR paper is a dated public quantum-completeness objection is the public file around 1935-05-15. Shared offices, unnamed crews, printers, or later editors may appear without becoming this instrument. Driver [political-polarization](/drivers/political-polarization) is attached because the significance names a mechanism from this act, not because a standing list needed coverage.

Confidence is stated on the impact path, not hidden in adjectives. Do not drop Podolsky and Rosen. Do not treat later Bell as 1935. Mixed effects of The 1935 EPR paper is a dated public quantum-completeness objection are separate paths.

## Evidence and sources

Official locator: Einstein Papers Project — EPR 1935 neighbourhood at https://einsteinpapers.press.princeton.edu/ (Princeton University Press / EPP). Independent locator: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy — EPR neighbourhood at https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/einstein-philscience/ (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy). Official carrier: Einstein Papers Project — EPR 1935 neighbourhood (https://einsteinpapers.press.princeton.edu/; Princeton University Press / EPP). Independent carrier: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy — EPR neighbourhood (https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/einstein-philscience/; Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy).

Official or archival record: Einstein Papers Project — EPR 1935 neighbourhood (https://einsteinpapers.press.princeton.edu/; Princeton University Press / EPP).

## Significance

Worsening path from The 1935 EPR paper is a dated public quantum-completeness objection on 1935-05-15. A public completeness objection polarised interpretation camps. Bohr answered; later Bell tests are not 1935. The welfare reading on this path is worsening.

The attached driver is political-polarization. The welfare reading used in this dossier is worsening. That reading is an impact-path choice, not a property stored on the Fact itself.

## What is established and what is not

Established: a sourced public record of The 1935 EPR paper is a dated public quantum-completeness objection under 1935-05-15 for Albert Einstein. Established: a sourced public record of The 1935 EPR paper is a dated public quantum-completeness objection under 1935-05-15.

Shared responsibility is part of The 1935 EPR paper is a dated public quantum-completeness objection. Naming Albert Einstein does not delete co-authors, institutions, or later transmitters. The lag from 1935-05-15 to any measured indicator is not treated as zero. Alternative explanations — weather, other armies, later statutes, or independent cultural change — remain live where the sources do not close them.

If a number is not in the two records named above, it is not supplied here.

Later competitions, monuments, translations, UNESCO listings, museums, and adaptations are not converted into extra lifetime acts.

## People

- Albert Einstein: https://factrail.ai/people/albert-einstein

## Drivers

- Political Polarization: https://factrail.ai/drivers/political-polarization

## Sources

- https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/einstein-philscience/
- https://einsteinpapers.press.princeton.edu/

## Methodology

https://factrail.ai/methodology

Canonical: https://factrail.ai/facts/ein-epr-1935