# Fundamental Constitutions of Carolina print hereditary rank and slavery clauses of disputed Locke drafting-weight

Date: 1669

## The fact

Store the public text and the disputed secretary-role. Do not invent unique personal slave-counts. Medium confidence on unique authorship. The dated public instrument is stored under 1669-01-01. [John Locke](/people/john-locke) did not operate this later page as a civil-registry autograph.

It is one event.

## Context

Shared institutions, unnamed crews, and later editors remain in the record and do not erase a documented heading.

John Locke Shared work with other named actors remains in the record.

John Locke’s documented role is bounded by other offices and collaborators named in the sources below. Sharing a field with them is not a reason to drop a documented act, and it is not a reason to assign later consequences done in the name after death.

Conventional 1632–1704. Dated instruments are Gutenberg TMS-no: Treatises, Essay, Letter, SEP, Bodleian, and TNA catalogues.

Named person as heading of the dated public instrument. Later editors, museums, printers, or offices share publication. Complex where later carriers are the surviving public file.

## Evidence and sources

Documenting the American South — later Carolina constitutions texts and Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy — Locke’s Political Philosophy independently describe this instrument.

Official or archival record: Documenting the American South — later Carolina constitutions texts (https://docsouth.unc.edu/; [University of North Carolina](/organizations/university-of-north-carolina)).

## Significance

Store the public text and the disputed secretary-role. Do not invent unique personal slave-counts. Medium confidence on unique authorship.

## What is established and what is not

Established as a dated public record of this instrument.

What would change the picture: a contradictory original with a different date or name, or a measured series that can be argued, with lag and alternatives, as a consequence of this instrument rather than of later institutions.

What would change the picture: a contradictory original with a different date or name, or a measured series that can be argued, with lag and alternatives, as a consequence of this instrument rather than of later institutions.

The date is the date of this instrument, not a licence to back-date every later harm or benefit.

Established here: a sourced, dated public instrument with a named contribution by John Locke.

They are not a public rating.

Driver `labour-market-tightness` is attached because the Significance sentence names a mechanism from Fundamental Constitutions of Carolina print hereditary rank and slavery clauses of disputed Locke drafting-weight at 1669-01-01, not because a standing driver list needed coverage. Official page: https://docsouth.unc.edu/. Independent page: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/locke-political/.

## People

- John Locke: https://factrail.ai/people/john-locke

## Drivers

- Labour-Market Tightness: https://factrail.ai/drivers/labour-market-tightness

## Sources

- https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/locke-political/
- https://docsouth.unc.edu/

## Methodology

https://factrail.ai/methodology

Canonical: https://factrail.ai/facts/jlk-carolina-constitutions