# Some Considerations of the Consequences of the Lowering of Interest is published Date: 1692 ## The fact In 1691–92 Some Considerations of the Consequences of the Lowering of Interest, and Raising the Value of Money appeared as a public tract against a bill to cap interest. It is a dated interest-law argument, not the 1695 Further Considerations on raising the denomination of coin. [John Locke](/people/john-locke)’s documented role is: He published a 1691/92 tract against a legal maximum-interest bill. Parliament debated; he wrote the public argument. Do not twin this with the 1695 Further Considerations coinage pamphlet. Interest law is not silver denomination. Later editors, printers, and excavators remain named where they appear. John Locke's documented role is: He published a 1691/92 tract against a legal maximum-interest bill. Parliament debated; he wrote the public argument. ## Context A [House of Commons](/organizations/house-of-commons) proposal to lower legal interest already sat in the file. Locke argued that a cap would not cheapen money as intended. Later collected ‘Works’ are not 1692 type. This is not Wealth of Nations. Named others on the file: Parliamentary proposers of the cap, unnamed readers in the money interest, and later printers of collected works share the file. The public setting is the file around 1692-01-01. Unnamed clerks, soldiers, printers, or later editors may appear without becoming this instrument. Contribution type is direct. The instrument stays Some Considerations of the Consequences of the Lowering of Interest is published. The setting of Some Considerations of the Consequences of the Lowering of Interest is published is the public file around 1692-01-01. Shared offices, unnamed crews, printers, or later editors may appear without becoming this instrument. Contribution type is direct. Driver [fiscal-policy-sustainability](/drivers/fiscal-policy-sustainability) is attached because the significance names a mechanism from this act, not because a standing list needed coverage. Shared responsibility is part of Some Considerations of the Consequences of the Lowering of Interest is published. Naming John Locke does not delete co-authors, institutions, or later transmitters. The lag from 1692-01-01 to any measured indicator is not treated as zero. Alternative explanations — weather, other armies, later statutes, or independent cultural change — remain live where the sources do not close them. ## Evidence and sources Gutenberg’s money-tract English and SEP independently distinguish the 1692 interest Considerations from later coinage pieces. Official: Some Considerations of the Consequences of the Lowering of Interest — public English (https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/7371; Project Gutenberg). Independent: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy — Locke, political philosophy and money (https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/locke/; Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy). The two URLs are different pages. Where the carrier is a later edition or a received narrative, that limit is stated rather than upgraded to an autograph. Official carrier: Some Considerations of the Consequences of the Lowering of Interest — public English (https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/7371; Project Gutenberg). Independent carrier: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy — Locke, political philosophy and money (https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/locke/; Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy). Official or archival record: Some Considerations of the Consequences of the Lowering of Interest — public English (https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/7371; Project Gutenberg). ## Significance Improving fiscal-sustainability path: a public argument against a statutory interest cap. Direct on the tract. Welfare reading improving. The attached mechanism is A dated print argument against a statutory interest cap put a public political-economy text into the 1690s money file. Lag to any modern indicator is not treated as zero. This path is attached because the mechanism is named from this act, not because a driver list needed coverage. The welfare reading on this path is improving. ## What is established and what is not Established: a 1691/92 Considerations tract. Not established: that the bill’s failure is uniquely his, or a unique credit series. Established: a sourced public record of Some Considerations of the Consequences of the Lowering of Interest is published under 1692-01-01. Established: a sourced public record of Some Considerations of the Consequences of the Lowering of Interest is published under 1692-01-01. Later competitions, monuments, translations, UNESCO listings, museums, and adaptations are not converted into extra lifetime acts. If a number is not in the two records named above, it is not supplied here. Confidence is stated on the impact path, not hidden in adjectives. Do not twin this with the 1695 Further Considerations coinage pamphlet. Interest law is not silver denomination. Mixed effects of Some Considerations of the Consequences of the Lowering of Interest is published are separate paths. The contribution type is direct. The attached driver is fiscal-policy-sustainability. The welfare reading used in this dossier is improving. That reading is an impact-path choice, not a property stored on the Fact itself. ## People - John Locke: https://factrail.ai/people/john-locke ## Drivers - Fiscal-Policy Sustainability: https://factrail.ai/drivers/fiscal-policy-sustainability ## Sources - https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/7371 - https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/locke/ ## Methodology https://factrail.ai/methodology Canonical: https://factrail.ai/facts/jlk-some-considerations-1692