# More serves as undersheriff of London from 1510 as a dated civic legal office

Date: 1510

## The fact

In 1510 More became one of London’s undersheriffs, a civic legal office he held into the 1510s. It is not the 1529 chancellorship as a second copy.

It is one event.

## Context

History of Parliament Online and Britannica independently date the 1510 undershrievalty.

[Thomas More](/people/thomas-more)’s documented role is bounded by other offices and collaborators named in the sources below. Sharing a field with them is not a reason to drop a documented act, and it is not a reason to assign later consequences done in the name after death.

Conventional years are 1478–1535. Surviving public files are later parliamentary biographies, TNA calendars, HRP Tower pages, the Yale More tradition, and encyclopedias. More did not typeset those later pages. 1935 canonisation is posthumous and is not a Fact.

Named person as heading of the dated public instrument. Later editors, museums, printers, or offices share publication. Complex where later carriers are the surviving public file.

## Evidence and sources

History of Parliament Online and Britannica independently describe the 1510 London undersheriff post.

Official or archival record: History of Parliament — MORE, Thomas I (1477/78–1535) (https://www.historyofparliamentonline.org/node/51193/; History of Parliament Trust).

## Significance

High confidence on the office.

## What is established and what is not

Established: More was undersheriff of London from 1510. Not established: a unique later fair-trial series from that court.

What would change the picture: a contradictory original with a different date or name, or a measured series that can be argued, with lag and alternatives, as a consequence of this instrument rather than of later institutions.

The date is the date of this instrument, not a licence to back-date every later harm or benefit.

Established here: a sourced, dated public instrument with a named contribution by Thomas More.

They are not a public rating.

Thomas More did not file a later UNESCO form, a later Loeb colophon, or a later museum label as a personal act. A portrait or conventional bust is not this mechanism. Allegation, reconstruction, and established occurrence stay distinct. A City court is not Tower Hill. Keep 1535 as the killing. Keep the carrier date of later English distinct from the received historical year stored in the date field. Do not read a later English edition as a recovered autograph of Thomas More.

## People

- Thomas More: https://factrail.ai/people/thomas-more

## Drivers

- Judicial independence erosion (court capture): https://factrail.ai/drivers/justice-judicial-independence-erosion

## Sources

- https://www.britannica.com/biography/Thomas-More-English-humanist-and-statesman
- https://www.historyofparliamentonline.org/node/51193/

## Methodology

https://factrail.ai/methodology

Canonical: https://factrail.ai/facts/tm-under-sheriff