# The Supreme Court stays the Clean Power Plan Date: 2016 ## The fact On 9 February 2016 the Supreme Court issued a 5–4 stay of the Clean Power Plan pending judicial review, the first time the Court had stayed an EPA rule before a circuit decision on the merits. The 2015 rule remains the parent. ## Context CPP 3 August 2015 sat as parent. Neighbouring Paris 2016 still completed as a depositary act. He did not sit as the Court. States and industry petitioners won the stay. CPP 3 August 2015 is the parent rule. Paris 3 September 2016 is a neighbour depositary act that still completed. A United States president proposes, signs, vetoes, and directs the executive. Congress enacts statutes. The Federal Reserve, states, courts, and later presidents share later series. Office-holding is not authorship of every later outcome. Allegation is not a completed judgment. Legislative achievements require shared congressional attribution. He does not set the federal funds rate, write a state Medicaid waiver by himself, or convert a 2009 oath into a unique 2016 uninsured coefficient. A signature is not unique authorship of a House and Senate text. A troop order is not authorship of every later round. He is not president as of 27 August 2026. [Donald Trump](/people/mig-donald-trump) is president from 20 January 2025. [Joe Biden](/people/env-person-joe-biden) was president 2021–2025. ## Evidence and sources Supreme Court of the United States carries the official instrument or communique. Reuters records the same dated act independently. ## Significance The path is decarbonization policy: a completed apex stay of the parent EPA rule. ## What is established and what is not Established: 9 February 2016 Supreme Court stay, independently reported. Not established: that the Paris Agreement uniquely fell that day — it did not — or a unique later coal-plant coefficient from the stay hour. What would change the picture: a contradictory original with a different date or name, a later repeal, a court that vacated the instrument, or a measured series that can be argued, with lag and alternatives, as a consequence of this instrument rather than of later institutions. The date is the date of this instrument, not a licence to back-date every later harm or benefit. He had issued the parent rule through EPA. Petitioner states litigated.. A later repeal, court stay, or successor order would be a different Fact with a different date. Co-authors and later implementers named in Context remain on the file. The Supreme Court stays the Clean Power Plan on 2016-02-09 is not a licence to treat every later Supreme Court of the United States communique as this same act. This dossier refuses to average The Supreme Court stays the Clean Power Plan into a personality. The contribution described on this Person row is limited to The Court stayed. He had issued the parent rule through EPA. Petitioner states litigated. That limit is the alternative to treating office-holding as authorship of every later series. ## People - Barack Obama: https://factrail.ai/people/barack-obama ## Drivers - Decarbonization and climate-mitigation policy: https://factrail.ai/drivers/env-decarbonization-policy - Carbon-Pricing Coverage: https://factrail.ai/drivers/carbon-pricing-coverage ## Sources - https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-court-carbon-idUSKCN0VI24L - https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/020916zr3_hf5m.pdf ## Methodology https://factrail.ai/methodology Canonical: https://factrail.ai/facts/us-obama-cpp-stay-2016