The finance ministry describes registration, annual accountability and active-transparency obligations under Law 7363. In indicator-value terms, a higher transparency/accountability rating is beneficial, encoded strengthening / +1; the note does not assume implementation is neutral or non-selective. Strength basis: Registration and active-transparency duties can improve accountability if proportionate and consistently enforced. Strength 0.41 is a qualitative pathway class from the pack, not an empirical coefficient; it creates no historical indicator observations.
Peña Colorado continuity: raises welfare, impact strength 41%, 0 linked facts on the timeline.CPIA transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector rating (1=low to 6=high)
It belongs to Human Rights, Freedoms, and Equality Before the Law, the part of the welfare catalog concerned with institutional protection from abuse, legal equality, political freedom, and access to remedy. The exact stored unit is Score [SCORE], the geographic presentation is global, the data publisher is World Ba…
How to read it
Readings above the normal line are better than normal; readings below it are worse.
Indicator & its drivers over time
About this indicator
It belongs to Human Rights, Freedoms, and Equality Before the Law, the part of the welfare catalog concerned with institutional protection from abuse, legal equality, political freedom, and access to remedy. The exact stored unit is Score [SCORE], the geographic presentation is global, the data publisher is World Bank, and the immutable numerical identity is WDI IQ.CPA.TRAN.XQ#identity. Candidate 78 is broader or differently denominated than “CPIA transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector rating (1=low to 6=high)” in Score [SCORE]. Factrail stores this narrower source-defined measure, preserves the input wording in reconciliation, and makes no claim that the values measure the broader phrase. For catalog item 78, the provider definition is: The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public... That definition controls the denominator, population, reporting instrument, and statistical meaning. This Indicator records an observed outcome; it does not assert why that outcome changed. Welfare assessment for item 78 uses higherisbetter. Higher observations are treated as better welfare relative to the dated comparative reference. The direction applies to the stored official measure after the disclosed transformation, if any, rather than being inferred from an emotionally positive or negative title. No mathematical transformation is applied before persistence. Keeping title, series identity, unit, scope, transformation, and interpretation together prevents the record from mixing incompatible measurement concepts. The numerical observations for catalog item 78 were retrieved from World Development Indicators (WDI) through https://data360api.worldbank.org/data360/data?DATABASEID=WBWDI&INDICATOR=WBWDIIQCPATRAN_XQ&timePeriodFrom=2018&timePeriodTo=2025 (opens in a new tab). The provider landing page is https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/IQ.CPA.TRAN.XQ (opens in a new tab). The research package records the access date, exact dataset and series identifiers, dimension key country=all, unit, provider metadata, transformation, and yearly aggregation label. The bounded Source and Evidence records can therefore reproduce which numbers were used without treating a generic homepage as row-level proof. Measurement provenance for item 78 follows this provider method: The World Bank world aggregate is retained when it exists for a year; otherwise Factrail records a disclosed unweighted mean of reporting economies for the same exact indicator code. The aggregation label on every point distinguishes those two cases. 2018 combines 73 reporting economies; 2019 combines 75 reporting economies; 2020 combines 73 reporting economies; 2021 combines 72 reporting economies; 2022 combines 74 reporting economies; 2023 combines 74 reporting economies; 2024 combines 77 reporting economies; 2025 combines 78 reporting economies. The output keeps full numerical precision through NormalLine, deviation, and interpretation calculations. Display clients may round for readability, but the persisted value is not squeezed into a zero-to-one score and is not rounded before calculation. The item 78 NormalLine starts on 2018-01-01 at 3.5 Score [SCORE]. 75th percentile of provider-published reporting-economy observations in the selected series and dimensions. The calculation keeps the source unit, dimensions, and transformation fixed and is a comparative reference rather than an invented statutory target. For zeroisnorm, the value is exactly zero and is never relaxed because non-zero observations are common. For every item 78 point, normallinevalue copies that dated line and deviationfromnormal is stored in raw-unit terms as observation minus NormalLine. Arithmetic sign and welfare sign are separate. A positive raw deviation is adverse for lowerisbetter, favourable for higherisbetter, and adverse above zero for zeroisnorm. The custom governance score retains its provider scale and uses the public methodology explanation rather than title sentiment. The complete retained sequence is 2018: 2.842466 Score [SCORE]; 2019: 2.846667 Score [SCORE]; 2020: 2.856164 Score [SCORE]; 2021: 2.868056 Score [SCORE]; 2022: 2.851351 Score [SCORE]; 2023: 2.817568 Score [SCORE]; 2024: 2.779221 Score [SCORE]; 2025: 2.75 Score [SCORE]. The first observation is 2.842466 Score [SCORE] in 2018 and the latest is 2.75 Score [SCORE] in 2025. The absolute change is -0.092466 Score [SCORE], equivalent to -3.2530204407% of the absolute starting level. The minimum observed value is 2.75 Score [SCORE], and the maximum is 2.868056 Score [SCORE]. For catalog item 78, the latest observation differs from the NormalLine by -0.75 Score [SCORE] and is classified as negative under higherisbetter. That classification is a deterministic comparison, not a causal explanation or editorial verdict. A movement may reflect real change, altered reporting coverage, revised estimates, a changed survey frame, or several of those at once. There are 8 retained item 78 observations in the selected 2018-2025 research window. The retained observations satisfy the minimum temporal rule without interpolation, extrapolation, or forward filling. Missing years are absent observations, not zeroes. The sequence is intentionally irregular when the official source is irregular, because a smooth-looking line created by invented values would be methodologically false. The displayed global item 78 sequence has one consistent numerical identity: WDI IQ.CPA.TRAN.XQ#identity. No second source series is spliced into a gap, no latest value is copied into a missing year, and no country-only observation is relabelled as a World value. If the source later adds or revises an observation, the update must arrive as a new reviewed research package with its own checksum and audit record. A defensible graph edge requires an existing Driver, direction, strength, lag, confidence, and Source/Evidence that supports the mechanism. The outcome series alone cannot establish that causal chain. For item 78, importance weight 0.8500000000000001 is generated by indicator-importance-rubric-v1. Its five committed components are directness 0.85, population reach 0.85, persistence 0.9, effect on human capabilities 0.85, and overlap control 0.85. The formula weights them 0.35, 0.25, 0.20, 0.15, and 0.05, then rounds to the nearest 0.05. The value is deterministic and reproducible; it is not an intuitive score assigned while drafting prose. Candidate 78 is broader or differently denominated than “CPIA transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector rating (1=low to 6=high)” in Score [SCORE]. Factrail stores this narrower source-defined measure, preserves the input wording in reconciliation, and makes no claim that the values measure the broader phrase. The correction preserves all 120 catalog candidates as auditable inputs while refusing to fabricate a literal series that the selected official systems do not publish coherently. The resulting canonical Indicator may be narrower, differently denominated, or differently scoped than the preliminary phrase, and that difference is part of the record rather than hidden in a footnote. The 2018-2025 sequence for item 78 is too short for strong causal or structural claims. Cross-economy comparability can be affected by institutional definitions, survey coverage, modelled estimates, missing observations, classification practices, revisions, and unequal statistical capacity. A global aggregate or unweighted reporting-economy mean can also conceal distributional extremes and should not be used as an individual-level estimate. The item 78 NormalLine is a transparent comparative reference, not a claim that every jurisdiction has the same legal target or feasible frontier. The source may revise both historical points and metadata. Any later refresh must preserve the earlier Source, Evidence, checksum, and audit trail; it must not mutate the meaning of an already reviewed series identity.
Causal network
This indicator’s slice of Factrail’s verified causal web — the people, facts, drivers and welfare indicators it connects to. Select any node to trace a path.
By the Factrail desk · Method: how we source and score · Last reviewed