Skip to content
Mental Health and Subjective Well-Being

People reporting chronic depression

It belongs to Mental Health and Subjective Well-Being, the part of the welfare catalog concerned with reported experience, social connection, safety, time use, and the psychological quality of life. The exact stored unit is percent of people aged 15 and older, the geographic presentation is global, the data publishe…

current value7.2percent of people aged 15 and older
Worse than normalImproving(−0.07)
GlobalAbove normal = worseimportance: 0.80unit: percent of people aged 15 and older1 active driverUpdated Dec 2019

How to read it

Readings above the normal line are worse than normal, so they plot downward here; readings below it are better.

Indicator & its drivers over time

About this indicator

It belongs to Mental Health and Subjective Well-Being, the part of the welfare catalog concerned with reported experience, social connection, safety, time use, and the psychological quality of life. The exact stored unit is percent of people aged 15 and older, the geographic presentation is global, the data publisher is Eurostat, and the immutable numerical identity is EUROSTAT hlthehiscd1e The preliminary catalog candidate 32 is reconciled to the exact official series “People reporting chronic depression” in percent of people aged 15 and older. This is a deliberate canonical correction: the database title names what the values actually measure, while the input wording remains in the reconciliation and audit trail. No hidden proxy label, fallback series, or silently substituted denominator remains. For catalog item 32, the provider definition is: Persons reporting a chronic disease, by disease, sex, age and educational attainment level. Factrail retains only observations matching age=TOTAL|freq=A|hlthpb=DPRCHR|isced11=TOTAL|sex=T|unit=PC. The exact Eurostat dimension codes and any disclosed arithmetic combination remain part of the immutable series identity. That definition controls the denominator, population, reporting instrument, and statistical meaning. This Indicator records an observed outcome; it does not assert why that outcome changed. Welfare assessment for item 32 uses lowerisbetter. Lower observations are treated as better welfare relative to the dated comparative reference. The direction applies to the stored official measure after the disclosed transformation, if any, rather than being inferred from an emotionally positive or negative title. No mathematical transformation is applied before persistence. Keeping title, series identity, unit, scope, transformation, and interpretation together prevents the record from mixing incompatible measurement concepts. The numerical observations for catalog item 32 were retrieved from Persons reporting a chronic disease, by disease, sex, age and educational attainment level through https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/api/dissemination/statistics/1.0/data/hlthehiscd1e?lang=en&sinceTimePeriod=2014&untilTimePeriod=2019&freq=A&unit=PC&age=TOTAL&sex=T&isced11=TOTAL&hlthpb=DPRCHR (opens in a new tab). The provider landing page is https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/hlthehiscd1e/default/table?lang=en (opens in a new tab). The research package records the access date, exact dataset and series identifiers, dimension key age=TOTAL|freq=A|hlthpb=DPRCHR|isced11=TOTAL|sex=T|unit=PC, unit, provider metadata, transformation, and yearly aggregation label. The bounded Source and Evidence records can therefore reproduce which numbers were used without treating a generic homepage as row-level proof. Measurement provenance for item 32 follows this provider method: Eurostat supplies harmonised country observations under one explicit dimension tuple. Factrail records a disclosed unweighted annual mean of reporting economies, and any sum or ratio uses only components from that same dataset, year, country, and unit. 2014 combines 31 reporting economies; 2019 combines 31 reporting economies. The output keeps full numerical precision through NormalLine, deviation, and interpretation calculations. Display clients may round for readability, but the persisted value is not squeezed into a zero-to-one score and is not rounded before calculation. The item 32 NormalLine starts on 2014-01-01 at 4.475 percent of people aged 15 and older. 25th percentile of provider-published reporting-economy observations in the selected series and dimensions. The calculation keeps the source unit, dimensions, and transformation fixed and is a comparative reference rather than an invented statutory target. For zeroisnorm, the value is exactly zero and is never relaxed because non-zero observations are common. For every item 32 point, normallinevalue copies that dated line and deviationfromnormal is stored in raw-unit terms as observation minus NormalLine. Arithmetic sign and welfare sign are separate. A positive raw deviation is adverse for lowerisbetter, favourable for higherisbetter, and adverse above zero for zeroisnorm. The custom governance score retains its provider scale and uses the public methodology explanation rather than title sentiment. The complete retained sequence is 2014: 7.2258064516 percent of people aged 15 and older; 2019: 7.1548387097 percent of people aged 15 and older. The first observation is 7.2258064516 percent of people aged 15 and older in 2014 and the latest is 7.1548387097 percent of people aged 15 and older in 2019. The absolute change is -0.0709677419 percent of people aged 15 and older, equivalent to -0.982142856654% of the absolute starting level. The minimum observed value is 7.1548387097 percent of people aged 15 and older, and the maximum is 7.2258064516 percent of people aged 15 and older. For catalog item 32, the latest observation differs from the NormalLine by 2.6798387097 percent of people aged 15 and older and is classified as negative under lowerisbetter. That classification is a deterministic comparison, not a causal explanation or editorial verdict. A movement may reflect real change, altered reporting coverage, revised estimates, a changed survey frame, or several of those at once. There are 2 retained item 32 observations in the selected 2018-2025 research window. Eurostat's harmonised European Health Interview Survey publishes chronic-depression prevalence by survey wave rather than annually. The two comparable waves are 2014 and 2019; no synthetic 2020-2025 value is created because the next harmonised wave is not published. Missing years are absent observations, not zeroes. The sequence is intentionally irregular when the official source is irregular, because a smooth-looking line created by invented values would be methodologically false. The displayed global item 32 sequence has one consistent numerical identity: EUROSTAT hlthehiscd1e No second source series is spliced into a gap, no latest value is copied into a missing year, and no country-only observation is relabelled as a World value. If the source later adds or revises an observation, the update must arrive as a new reviewed research package with its own checksum and audit record. A defensible graph edge requires an existing Driver, direction, strength, lag, confidence, and Source/Evidence that supports the mechanism. The outcome series alone cannot establish that causal chain. For item 32, importance weight 0.8 is generated by indicator-importance-rubric-v1. Its five committed components are directness 0.75, population reach 0.85, persistence 0.8, effect on human capabilities 0.75, and overlap control 0.75. The formula weights them 0.35, 0.25, 0.20, 0.15, and 0.05, then rounds to the nearest 0.05. The value is deterministic and reproducible; it is not an intuitive score assigned while drafting prose. The 2014-2019 sequence for item 32 is too short for strong causal or structural claims. Cross-economy comparability can be affected by institutional definitions, survey coverage, modelled estimates, missing observations, classification practices, revisions, and unequal statistical capacity. A global aggregate or unweighted reporting-economy mean can also conceal distributional extremes and should not be used as an individual-level estimate. The item 32 NormalLine is a transparent comparative reference, not a claim that every jurisdiction has the same legal target or feasible frontier. The source may revise both historical points and metadata. Any later refresh must preserve the earlier Source, Evidence, checksum, and audit trail; it must not mutate the meaning of an already reviewed series identity.

Causal network

This indicator’s slice of Factrail’s verified causal web — the people, facts, drivers and welfare indicators it connects to. Select any node to trace a path.

By the Factrail desk · Method: how we source and score · Last reviewed