Leila Ali Elmi
Leila Ali Elmi (born 1988) is a Swedish politician of the Green Party (Miljöpartiet) and a member of the Riksdag for Gothenburg Municipality.
- Facts0
- Drivers0
- Indicators0
Leila Ali Elmi (born 1988) is a Swedish politician of the Green Party (Miljöpartiet) and a member of the Riksdag for Gothenburg Municipality.
Leila Ali Elmi (born 1988) is a Swedish politician of the Green Party (Miljöpartiet) and a member of the Riksdag for Gothenburg Municipality. She has sat as an ordinary member since 24 September 2018, with a leave of absence from 11 November to 14 December 2022, and the mandate recorded by the Riksdag runs to 23 September 2030. Since 6 October 2026 she has been vice chair of the Committee on Cultural Affairs. The same day the Green Party's parliamentary group named her its spokesperson for culture policy and for integration.
Expressen reported that she came from Ethiopia to Gothenburg at the age of two and grew up in Hjällbo, in the district of Angered, as the fourth of eight children. The Guardian reported that she arrived in Sweden aged two after her family fled the civil war in Somalia, and that she had lived for 28 years in Angered, which the paper described as a suburb shaped by unemployment, overcrowding and segregation. Before entering parliament she worked as an interpreter, helping newly arrived immigrants and refugees with administrative processes.
She joined the Green Party during the 2014 election campaign and for the next four years held part-time local posts, with schools among her main issues, including as a substitute on the Angered district board. In the 2018 Riksdag election she stood 21st on the party's Gothenburg list and received 1,467 personal votes, passing the rule that a candidate needs at least 5 percent of the party's votes in the constituency, and took one of the party's two seats from Gothenburg. The campaign was conducted in Swedish and in Somali. The Guardian described her as Sweden's first member of parliament to wear a hijab. Al Jazeera likewise called her the first Swedish MP to wear a hijab and the first of Somali descent, and SVT quoted her own message calling herself the first female MP of Somali origin from the suburbs.
The size of the personal vote prompted argument in Swedish media, including claims of clan or ethnic voting. In an Expressen interview she called the reaction a drive against her and said the votes came from work and from voters' trust in her. In the Riksdag she was a member of the Committee on the Labour Market from October 2018 until September 2026. The Green Party congress of 16 October 2021 elected her to the national executive for 2021–2023. In September 2022 SVT, citing a review by Aftonbladet, reported that she had had 17 payment orders at the Swedish Enforcement Authority during the parliamentary term; she wrote that she understood the damage to trust, that she had no debts left, and that she would pay on time.
Leila Ali Elmi was born on 16 January 1988. The Riksdag register records the birth year 1988 and does not give a day or a place. She is of Somali background. Published accounts of the family's move do not use the same geography. In an Expressen interview she said she came from Ethiopia to Gothenburg at the age of two. The Guardian wrote that she arrived in Sweden aged two after her family fled the civil war in Somalia. Al Jazeera presented her earliest memories as those of a two-year-old who fled that war, and a photo caption on the same article called her a refugee from Somalia. SVT Nyheter Väst, in September 2018, described her as from Somalia and raised in Hjällbo.
She is the fourth of eight children. She told Expressen that she grew up with her mother, with whom contact was "helt okej" ("okay"), and that she had no contact with her father. She described the relationship with her siblings as "ganska bra" ("fairly good") and said they were not on bad terms; she saw them from time to time.
She grew up in Hjällbo, in the borough of Angered in northeastern Gothenburg Municipality. In September 2018 she wrote that she had lived in Angered for 28 years and had watched exclusion and segregation produce an unequal city. By December that year she was living in Hammarkullen, another part of the same borough. The Guardian called Angered the disadvantaged immigrant suburb whose conditions—unemployment, overcrowding, exclusion and segregation—were the setting she later spoke from. Al Jazeera described the district as having a large migrant population, high unemployment, weak schools, housing shortages and wide segregation, and noted in March 2019 that it had been her home for 29 years. In October 2017, reporting the police's latest assessment, SVT listed Hjällbo together with neighbouring Hammarkullen, Gårdsten and Lövgärdet among Sweden's särskilt utsatta områden, areas classed as especially vulnerable.
Her earliest memories of Sweden, she told Al Jazeera, included a favourite pair of yellow trousers and time in the school playground. She said she then had a "fairy-tale mentality" and did not see colour or class. Expressen reported her account of school as a place of serious fights every day—"that was how you got to know each other"—and of a habit, which she called a survival mechanism, of attacking before being attacked, because in that setting the strongest person got by. She said staff had decided to single her out as "the classic problem child", so that if something happened it was always her fault, and that the treatment had scarred her. She described feeling alone as a person even though she had many friends, and said she related to Harry Potter because of that loneliness and a difficult upbringing, not because she had lost her parents.
As a teenager, she told Al Jazeera, a teacher told two Somali classmates—one who wanted to be a scientist and one who wanted to be a professional footballer—that they would never amount to that. She said the remark was the point at which her belief that any dream was possible collapsed. She told Expressen that, as a Black woman raised in a Swedish suburb, she felt represented neither in music and film nor in public authorities, and that following the civil rights movement in the United States was what started her interest in politics. Comparing the suburb of her childhood with later years, she said it had been segregated then as well, but not in the same way: crime and segregation had increased, and resources had diminished.
Her paid work before full-time politics was a sequence of ordinary jobs. In a February 2020 profile she said that at 15 she delivered newspapers in the mornings before school, that she afterwards worked briefly as a mother-tongue teacher, and that she had worked as an interpreter for ten years. Arbetet, in November 2018, listed her occupation as interpreter and earlier work as a newspaper distributor, cleaner, care assistant and case officer at a matching firm for newly arrived immigrants. She told the paper she had spent one summer as a cleaner just after upper secondary school. The interview, she said, had been difficult: she was asked about the difference between kinds of mops, did not know the terms, and later used the episode to illustrate what the same questions would be like for someone who did not command Swedish. A May 2022 profile instead described interpreting as a twelve-year occupation. The Guardian wrote that the work was help for newly arrived immigrants and refugees in getting through administrative processes.
For several years she also belonged to a network that brought Somali musicians to Gothenburg and to Copenhagen and Oslo. She later called that organizing her route into politics. People who had grown up in the diaspora, she said, had not had the same access to Somali musical heritage as their parents, and the events were also meant to give young people in the suburbs a setting other than those in which some were being drawn toward the Islamic State or other extreme milieux. She has said she was unemployed at times but never qualified for unemployment benefit. She was still working as an interpreter when she took her seat in parliament in 2018.
Leila Ali Elmi has said that, about five years before the 2018 election, she decided to join a political party in order to address poor schools and overcrowded housing she had experienced growing up in Angered, a borough in northeastern Gothenburg. She joined the Green Party (Miljöpartiet) during the 2014 election campaign, telling Göteborgs-Posten that it was the party whose positions best matched her own, and spent the next four years as a leisure politician alongside work as an interpreter.
In September 2018 she was 30. She told Expressen's Gothenburg edition that she had been born in Ethiopia and had lived in Angered for 28 years; SVT reported that she grew up in Hjällbo and was then living in Hammarkullen, in the same borough. She described herself in the campaign as an activist and a feminist, said she supported the Green programme, and said the effort was about an equal city, an equal school and an equal Gothenburg, with schools her main interest. In an interview with the news agency TT, carried by Göteborgs-Posten, she said schools in socioeconomically disadvantaged areas were what she would press if she reached the Riksdag.
On 11 December 2014, Gothenburg's municipal council appointed members and substitutes to the city's boards for 2015–2018, on a proposal from the nominating committee. For the Angered district board (Angereds stadsdelsnämnd), that proposal named Hillevi Werring (MP) as an ordinary member and Leila Ali Elmi (MP) as substitute number 5, the party's only substitute on the board. Substitutes were appointed for 2015–2018 in the order listed, and an absent ordinary member was to be replaced first by a substitute from the same party.
She still held that substitute role at the 2018 count. SVT described the move from the Angered board to one of the party's two Gothenburg seats in parliament, and said she was little known even inside the party; Göteborgs-Posten reported that parts of the local Green organisation had not met her.
Gothenburg Municipality is its own Riksdag constituency. In the 2018 election the Green Party received 24,286 votes there, 6.95 percent of valid votes, 8,582 fewer than in 2014, when it had taken 9.83 percent, and it was again allotted two seats. Turnout was 84.28 percent, and the count of members covered all 351 voting districts.
The Green Riksdag ballot in the constituency was locked. The party had registered its candidates, so a personal vote could be cast only by marking one name already printed on the ballot, not by writing in another. Under Chapter 14, Section 9 of the Elections Act (vallagen 2005:837), candidates are ordered first by the size of their personal vote totals, but such a total is established only for a candidate who receives special personal votes equal to at least 5 percent of the party's votes in the constituency. Seats that cannot be filled on that basis are filled from the order of names on the ballots, using comparison numbers under Section 10. The Election Authority describes the same rule: for the Riksdag the threshold is 5 percent of the party's votes in the constituency, with no extra minimum number of votes of the kind required in regional and municipal elections.
Ali Elmi stood 21st on the Green list for Gothenburg. In the Election Authority's final personal-vote table she received 1,467 votes, 6.04 percent of the party's 24,286, and was the only Green candidate in the constituency at or above 5 percent. Personal votes for Green candidates totalled 5,486, 22.59 percent of the party's ballots. A partial count, with 321 of 351 districts in, had put her at 1,351.
Emma Nohrén received 1,182 personal votes (4.87 percent) and Anna Sibinska 512 (2.11 percent), both short of the threshold. Göteborgs-Posten, also citing the Election Authority, named the two Greens elected from the constituency as Ali Elmi and Sibinska, and stated that candidates below 5 percent were elected through their place on the ballot rather than through personal votes. Her term as a member of the Riksdag began on 24 September 2018.
The campaign was conducted in Swedish and Somali. She told Expressen that she had used both languages because she worked as an interpreter, that doing so was within the rules, and that she had addressed all Gothenburgers who shared her views and the party's, not specifically people with roots in Somalia or its neighbours. Dagens Nyheter reported that door-knocking by the football club Bergsjöns SK in Gothenburg's outer districts was part of the effort that produced the personal votes. Where those votes were cast, and the Somali-language material in the campaign, became the subject of a separate dispute about clan and ethnic voting.
Leila Ali Elmi took her seat in the Riksdag on 24 September 2018 as an ordinary member for the Green Party (Miljöpartiet) from the Gothenburg Municipality constituency, Göteborgs kommun. The parliament’s open data give her chamber seat for that term as number 334 and record the assignment as running until the next Riksdag met on 26 September 2022. SVT reported that she received 1,467 preference votes and was elected from place 21 on the Gothenburg list, taking one of the party’s two seats in the constituency. In the Election Authority’s final count the Greens received 24,286 votes there, 6.95 percent, and the personal-vote table lists 1,467 votes — 6.04 percent of the party’s constituency total — as the highest Green preference result. A Riksdag candidate is elected on preference votes, ahead of the list order, with at least 5 percent of the party’s votes in the constituency.
From 2 October 2018 she was an ordinary member of the Committee on the Labour Market (arbetsmarknadsutskottet) and a substitute on the Committee on Education (utbildningsutskottet), both through 26 September 2022. She was also a substitute on the Committee on Civil Affairs from 9 October 2018 to 6 February 2019 and again from 7 February 2019 to 30 September 2020. From 13 October 2021 she held a further set of substitute seats, recorded through 26 September 2022, on the committees for civil affairs, finance, justice, cultural affairs, environment and agriculture, industry and trade, social insurance, taxation, health and welfare, and transport and communications, plus the Committee on EU Affairs until 4 October 2022.
The Green Party congress of 16 October 2021 elected her, then 33 and listed as a new member from Gothenburg, to the party board (partistyrelse) for 2021–2023. Board members are chosen for two years at a time. On 13 December 2021 a Gothenburg members’ meeting placed her first on the party’s Riksdag ballot for the constituency, with Emma Nohrén second.
The Election Authority’s decision on the 11 September 2022 election records 1,616 preference votes for her in Gothenburg Municipality, 5.88 percent of the Greens’ votes there, and names her as the party’s first elected member, with Nohrén second. The final constituency count gave the party 27,485 votes, 7.92 percent, and two seats. The new term in the chamber began on 26 September 2022, with seat number 129.
On 15 November 2022 the chamber was told that Nicklas Attefjord would serve as her substitute during leave from 11 November to 14 December. The register marks her absent from 14:30 on 11 November through 14 December and serving again from 15 December 2022, still in seat 129, until 28 September 2026. Altinget reported on 22 November that she was on sick leave and that Attefjord replaced her, as the party’s labour-market spokesperson, on the Labour Market Committee.
For the rest of that term she was an ordinary member of the Labour Market Committee from 4 October 2022 to 28 September 2026 and a substitute on the Committee on Cultural Affairs (kulturutskottet) over the same dates. She was a substitute on the Education Committee and the Committee on Health and Welfare from 12 October 2022 to 28 September 2026. The nomination committee’s proposal for the board to be elected at the congress of 15–17 November 2023 did not include her among the members put forward for the following two-year term.
She was returned again for Gothenburg Municipality in the election of 13 September 2026 and took her seat on 28 September 2026. Open data give the 2026–2030 chamber assignment seat number 264, the place shown on her Riksdag member page, and set the end of the mandate at 23 September 2030. On the main Gothenburg Green list, number 0055-08367, she stood first and received 1,761 preference votes, with a further 12 on another party list. The constituency protocol’s summary records 1,773 preference votes, 5.15 percent of the party’s votes there. The Greens won 34,440 votes in the constituency, 9.05 percent, and two seats, and the results file marks her as personally elected.
On 6 October 2026 the register lists her as an ordinary member of the Committee on Cultural Affairs and, the same day, as its vice chair (vice ordförande) through 23 September 2030. From 13 October 2026 she is a substitute on the Labour Market and Education committees for the rest of the term. The Green parliamentary group that day named her the party’s culture-policy spokesperson and its spokesperson on integration. The party’s release said that in the preceding term she had been a member of the Labour Market Committee and the integration-policy spokesperson, and that she had earlier been a Culture Committee substitute.
Leila Ali Elmi was an ordinary member of the Riksdag's Committee on the Labour Market (Arbetsmarknadsutskottet) from 2 October 2018 until 28 September 2026, and a deputy member from 13 October 2026. The Green Party has described her as its integration-policy spokesperson during the 2022–2026 term, a role it said she kept after the 2026 election; reporting in 2022 and 2025 also called her the party's labour-market spokesperson.
In committee motion 2020/21:2701, Ali Elmi and other Green members wrote that learning Swedish was the key to integration in Sweden, and asked that asylum seekers be offered Swedish and civic orientation from the day they applied, with language teaching an obligatory part of reception. It also sought an establishment programme that could run for longer or shorter than two years, validation of foreign qualifications, subsidised jobs in welfare shortage occupations, and stronger measures for foreign-born women. Her 2026 labour-market budget motion (2025/26:3525) proposed short vocational courses combined with language study, especially for women and shortage occupations, a variable-length establishment programme, and a rebuilt local presence for the Swedish Public Employment Service, whose staffed offices the motion said had fallen from about 170 municipalities in early 2019 to 81 in 2024.
Ali Elmi signed the Green follow-up motion 2025/26:357, submitted by Camilla Hansén and others, to government bill 2025/26:10 on Swedish for immigrants (sfi). It opposed limiting the right to sfi to three years, shorter than the inquiry's four-year proposal, and asked for a four-year right with extension for special reasons and for continued scope to combine sfi with vocational training, citing the effect on people with little schooling, women on parental leave, and people studying while working. The education committee and the chamber rejected both points.
On 15 April 2026 Ali Elmi led motion 2025/26:4086 answering government bill 2025/26:215, a new settlement act to replace the 2016 act. The committee's summary of the bill kept a municipal duty to receive people after assignment, added the housing market, areas of extensive social exclusion and, in some cases, a municipality's wishes to the allocation rules, and limited housing after assignment to 36 months, without security of tenure (besittningsskydd). The right could end earlier if the person was not assigned to a labour-market programme without acceptable reasons, or had that assignment withdrawn for circumstances within their control. The government gave as reasons greater municipal influence, more uniform reception, and clearer demands that the individual contribute to integration.
Its five points asked for flexible housing, rejection of the early-termination rules, security of tenure, a child perspective, and any consequential amendments. Report 2025/26:AU14, decided on 4 June 2026, proposed adopting the bill and rejecting all five points; the chamber did so, with Ali Elmi reserving.
In the same report the Social Democrats, through Ardalan Shekarabi and others, would have removed the clause on municipalities' wishes and asked that housing shortage not let municipalities with strong labour markets avoid reception. The Left Party called 36 months too short, wanted the early-termination section rejected in full, and asked for sanctions on municipalities that refuse assignments. Sweden Democrat members entered no reservation; a special statement said they had negotiated the bill, called it a major advance on the 2016 act, and would later seek voluntary reception limited to what each municipality judged it could take. Members of the Moderate Party, the Christian Democrats, the Liberals and the Centre Party voted with the Sweden Democrats for the bill.
On 19 January 2025 Expressen reported an interview that Mats Persson of the Liberals, then minister for employment and integration, had given to Göteborgs-Posten. He said Somalis who had come to Sweden had been met with benefits instead of demands — asked which benefit they could apply for rather than how they would support themselves — and called that very destructive. He linked a Stiftelsen Järvaveckan survey, reported as finding that half of Swedish Somalis lacked a job, to what he called a caretaking mentality in integration policy, and described it as a mistake Sweden had made, including while liberals held the integration portfolio in earlier non-socialist governments.
On 25 January, Omni reported Ali Elmi's reply to the same paper. She called the statement "incredibly irresponsible", saying it created stigmatisation and division and damaged trust in society, and that the government should discuss solutions to high unemployment rather than fixate on ethnicity and look for scapegoats. Omni also reported her comment that Roma and Somalis were the two groups most reviled in society.
In motion 2023/24:2895, on the goal in the 2024 spring amending budget, she asked the Riksdag to reject the proposed integration-policy goal and keep the existing one, quoted as equal rights, obligations and opportunities for all regardless of ethnic and cultural background. It said the new wording demanded more social, cultural, economic and linguistic integration and more individual effort and, read with the Tidö Agreement, would keep newcomers out of welfare until they had "qualified", which the signatories called an extension of Sweden Democrat policy; they preferred stronger popular education, sfi and labour-market measures. The finance committee and the chamber rejected both points.
Schooling in northern Gothenburg, including Angered, was among the issues Leila Ali Elmi raised in her 2018 campaign for the Riksdag. SVT Nyheter Väst reported that schools had been one of her main questions as a part-time Green Party politician since 2014, and that she campaigned in Swedish and Somali. After the election she wrote that 28 years in Angered had shown her how exclusion and segregation made the city unequal, and that she wanted a school which built every child's self-confidence. She has been a substitute on the Education Committee in each term: 2 October 2018–26 September 2022, 12 October 2022–28 September 2026, and from 13 October 2026.
On 5 October 2021 she and Annika Hirvonen filed the private motion "Motverka skolsegregationen". It said segregation between schools had risen sharply since the early 1990s, mostly through housing but also because choice and independent schools sorted pupils by socio-economic background. Framed as Green priorities, it asked for an end to profit-making school companies, common admissions, state responsibility for equitable funding, wider access to leisure-time centres, and more children in preschool. The Education Committee recommended rejection, and the chamber rejected all five points.
On 14 April 2026 Ali Elmi spoke for the Greens on report 2025/26:AU11, on gender equality and measures against discrimination. The Riksdag rejected the motions the next day. She did not take up economic equality between women and men. She said Sweden's seven grounds of discrimination gave protection, but not against discrimination of minorities for their language in contact with authorities, at school and in daily life. She opposed the Tidö parties' view that the law was enough, and a Sweden Democrat proposal to replace the seven grounds with a general idea of improper differential treatment, which she said would make it easier to dismiss the experiences of minorities, LGBTQI people and people with disabilities. She moved reservation 12, for an inquiry into language as a ground in the Discrimination Act.
The call for statistics on ethnicity, religion and related grounds, known as jämlikhetsdata, was hers rather than Green Party policy. On 15 March 2019 Expressen reported it under the headline "MP-ledamoten: Kartlägg människor efter deras ras". She had told Dagens ETC, "Jag är positiv till att införa jämlikhetsdata där man registrerar människor efter deras ras", citing the United States, while saying the data could be misused and should be investigated rather than treating Sweden as colour-blind. She called structural racism a heart issue, pointed to sex-disaggregated statistics as the model from gender-equality policy, and told Expressen she was "väldigt positiv" to data on religion, ethnicity, disability and sexual orientation as well, so that people could register an ethnicity. A similar line had been adopted by the Left Party congress in February 2018, against that party's leadership. Her press secretary then told Expressen that the view was hers as an MP, not the Greens' official line. Annika Qarlsson, the Centre Party spokesperson on gender equality and women's entrepreneurship, said the risks were too great, citing historical abuses connected with registers, and asked what the next step would be and what benefit would outweigh the risk.
On 3 October 2019 she and Annika Hirvonen Falk still submitted private motion 2019/20:3318, "Sverige bör införa jämlikhetsdata", asking for a review of whether and how to introduce it and for an assignment to Statistics Sweden. The motion argued that sex-divided statistics had been decisive for gender-equality policy, but that official statistics still covered only sex and age among the discrimination grounds. It defined equality data as survey statistics based on voluntariness, anonymity, informed consent and self-identification—"inte på något sätt om någon form av registrering av en enskild och identifierbar person"—cited EU and UN criticism, including under the convention against racial discrimination, and said a 2012 inquiry by the Equality Ombudsman had found that the law allowed the practice and that it both could and should be introduced.
Report 2019/20:AU7, signed on 11 February 2020, took the motion with a similar Left Party proposal. The Labour Market Committee would not abandon Sweden's restrictive approach to statistics on national minorities and other minority groups, despite criticism from the Council of Europe. It wrote that Afro-Swedes and Sweden Finns supported such collection while Jews and Roma had stated opposition, citing the Ombudsman's material, and that it had some sympathy for the aim but was not prepared to act. Only the Left Party reserved. Ali Elmi, then an ordinary member of the committee, took part in the decision. The committee proposed rejection, and the chamber rejected both points.
On 16 January 2026, debating the UN committee against racial discrimination's review of Sweden, she said repeated reviews had found that Sweden knew too little about how racism and discrimination fell. Against the charge that equality data are a dangerous race register, she said what the UN recommends rests on self-identification and anonymity and is "raka motsatsen till ett tvångsregister, nämligen ett verktyg för skydd".
On 6 October 2026 the Green Party's new Riksdag group named Leila Ali Elmi spokesperson for culture policy and for integration, and the culture committee elected her vice chair the same morning. The Riksdag records that vice-chair term as starting on 6 October 2026. The committee prepares decisions on culture, cultural heritage, sport, public-service radio and television, folkbildning, youth policy, the gambling market and overarching questions of civil society. Mattias Karlsson Bergman of the Sweden Democrats, the longest-serving member present, was elected chair.
In the party's announcement Ali Elmi called culture "not a luxury for a few, but a democratic right," and said every child and young person should be able to meet culture, create, and feel that cultural life was for them as well. The release listed her priorities for the term as equal access, children's and young people's right to culture, a strong folkbildning and association life, and independence from political steering, with the stated aim of narrowing class differences and segregation.
On 23 October 2026 she told Altinget that a "cultural allemansrätt," making culture available to children and young people, was very important for the party. The party had published that pledge in February 2026 through co-spokesperson Amanda Lind: meetings with professional culture each term from compulsory school through upper secondary school, in place of what the party called an unequal project-grant lottery, and a culture-school act to secure municipal culture-school places at reasonable fees. Asked about free admission to state museums, Ali Elmi said a return was unlikely because there was "not so much political life in that question right now."
Government bill 2025/26:287, Ny politisk inriktning för ett starkare filmland, was signed on 18 June 2026 by Deputy Prime Minister Ebba Busch and Culture Minister Parisa Liljestrand and entered in the Riksdag on 22 June. It proposes three goals: a broad, high-quality offering created and shown across the country; Swedish film with a large audience at home and abroad; and preservation and use of the film heritage. The assessments favour a stronger audience focus, less detailed political control, and more private as well as public finance. The Swedish Film Institute would remain a foundation, with clearer grant rules and support directed to content in Swedish and the national minority languages; from 1 January 2027 it would run the production incentive on a predictable allocation, and some of its decisions would become appealable.
The government describes consultation opinion on a film fund as generally positive, but says organisation and the distribution of power still need study, and it opened inquiry dir. 2026:54, led by Mattias Thalén, on a financing structure. It does not adopt the film inquiry's streaming fee of 1.5 percent of relevant Swedish turnover, citing among other objections the Budget Act's bar on earmarked taxes and uncertainty about who would pay. A cut in cinema VAT linked to a negotiated levy on ticket revenue is also postponed, because the levy would require an agreement between the institute and cinema owners, and further measures against illegal IP-TV are left for more analysis.
On 13 October 2026 Ali Elmi and six other Green members filed follow-up motion 2026/27:35, which does not ask the Riksdag to reject the bill. It seeks five announcements to the government: a stepwise plan for a film fund, so preparatory separation of the institute's funds can start before every financing source exists; a streaming co-financing fee along the lines of the inquiry; a full examination, including tax questions the new inquiry is barred from studying, of lowering cinema VAT from 25 to 6 percent together with a voluntary 10 percent fee on gross ticket revenue, with regard for smaller and non-profit cinemas; proposals to limit illegal IP-TV; and enough room in a new grant ordinance for the institute to adapt support, including regional and municipal work, while keeping an arm's-length distance in choosing which films receive cinema support. It accepts transparent grant rules but argues that public financing of Swedish film and television production is the lowest in the Nordic countries and Europe. The Left Party's motion 2026/27:25, filed the same day, instead asks the chamber to reject the bill for offering few new proposals and no financing model. Both went to the culture committee for report 2026/27:KrU3, with adjustment timetabled for 17 November 2026, debate on 24 November and a decision on 25 November; no committee proposal or chamber vote had been published.
After the 2018 election, reporting focused on how Ali Elmi, an interpreter and a substitute on the district board in Angered, northeastern Gothenburg, had built a preference-vote campaign in the suburbs for the Green Party. Dagens Nyheter reported that the football club Bergsjöns SK ran a door-knocking drive that helped take her into the Riksdag from a low place on the list. Svenska Dagbladet noted that the club had until recently been called Somalia SK and had many Somali-Swedish members.
Expressen's Gothenburg edition, GT, reviewed her Facebook videos and described the effort as directed at Somalis. At an Angered gathering for Somalia's national day on 1 July 2018 she said, in GT's translation, that she hoped "we Somalis support one another and vote for those of us who are standing"; other clips showed her in Biskopsgården, Frölunda and Bergsjön explaining how to mark her name. In some Angered districts she took more than 80 percent of the Greens' preference votes, though she said she had addressed all Gothenburgers who shared her values and the party's. Helena Munther, the Greens' political secretary in Gothenburg, told GT she had never met her. Voters interviewed by Dagens Nyheter called her a youthful Somali-Swedish representative of the suburb, distant from clan rule and Islamism, and objected to being cast as passive "clan voters."
The votes prompted charges of an ethnic bloc. The commentator Rebecca Weidmo Uvell called Ali Elmi a "Somali clan candidate" and an advocate of Somali nationalism, citing a photograph with Somalia's president; GT reported the charge. On 16 September 2018 Ivar Arpi asked in Svenska Dagbladet how independent she could be "from the group that carried her forward," and whether she would pursue questions that mainly benefited "the Somali, or Muslim, group" — the pattern, he wrote, where the clan or the ethnic group, rather than the individual, is the political subject. Her Facebook campaign, he wrote, was mostly in Somali — association meetings, Somali television, appeals to "the Somali people" — and urged preference votes for the Somali Greens Yusuf Tohow and Abdullahi Mahamed without stating their policies. Such voting was not undemocratic in itself, he argued, but if only some groups preference-voted that way, small organised groups could gain disproportionate influence. On 2 October he said no evidence supported a clan-vote claim, which he called a hasty inference from her being Somali and from clan structures in Somalia. An ethnically profiled campaign could be documented, and raising turnout in segregated areas was not itself undemocratic; the risk, he wrote, was politics sorted by who a candidate was rather than what she proposed.
Ali Elmi told Aftonbladet the criticism was "distasteful and tiresome." "I myself do not belong to any clan society and clearly distance myself from it," she said: women there lack the rights men have, so "as a woman it would be impossible to run a campaign based on clan." Campaigning in Swedish and Somali made politics accessible and fitted the electoral system, she said, and she did not feel bound to any group. In December she called the reaction a "drev," a pile-on, and said Somali-language campaigning reached voters who did not follow political Swedish. On Vasagatan in Stockholm a man told her that "people like you ought not to belong to Sweden's Riksdag"; she walked away.
The political scientist Jenny Madestam told GT the result was a "kick in the rear" for candidates who had mobilised less well: uneven weight was part of preference voting's turn toward social representation, and addressing immigrant groups was democratic, though a campaign the Swedish-speaking public could not follow was harder to scrutinise. Per Brinkemo told Aftonbladet that "clan voting" was being used too loosely. Canvassing was lawful, he said, but someone elected for who she was rather than a shared interest could face pressure to deliver to that group — a greater risk, he thought, in municipal politics than in the Riksdag — and he was not closely familiar with this case. Jonas Hinnfors, professor of political science at the University of Gothenburg, told The Guardian it was too early to say precisely who had voted for her, and that her appeal had been schools, segregation and jobs, not "we Muslims must stick together."
Swedish and foreign coverage also treated the headscarf as news. The Guardian's profile of 17 December 2018 was headlined "Sweden's first MP in a hijab" and said readers would that week see a member of parliament speak in one.
She told the paper her election had "caused a lot of reactions from the racists. They weren't really ready for it, but here I am." To Expressen she said she believed she was the first at that level in Europe to wear a hijab, and that in 2018 it "ought not to be a thing." In March 2019 she told The National she had begun wearing one about two years earlier because it was "helpful to have a connection to divinity," joking that she had chosen to talk to God rather than a therapist. Al Jazeera English, which likewise described her as Sweden's first hijab-wearing MP, quoted her saying she had "become a symbol of hate for extremists and racists" who saw her as "a threat to what Swedish society should be," and also "a symbol of hope" for others.
On 1 September 2022, ten days before the 2022 Swedish general election, Aftonbladet reported that Leila Ali Elmi, a Green Party member of the Riksdag from Gothenburg, had had 17 payment orders (betalningsförelägganden) at the Swedish Enforcement Authority (Kronofogden) since 2019, during her time as a member. The same day, Sveriges Television reported the review and wrote that the authority had decided both on enforced collection (indrivning) and on attachment (utmätning).
Aftonbladet described a payment order as a creditor’s claim that money was owed; the authority has not then decided whether the claim is justified, and the case is written off if the parties settle. One of the 17 cases reached a collection decision, but the debt was paid before further steps. A separate attachment, in April 2020, concerned 3,279 kronor owed to the Swedish Board of Student Finance (CSN). When the articles appeared she had no debt registered with Kronofogden. Aftonbladet stated that her basic parliamentary salary was 71,500 kronor a month, and noted her place on the labour-market committee, as a substitute on the tax committee, and as number seven on the Green Party’s Riksdag list.
Through her press secretary she told Aftonbladet that bills should be paid on time, that she was not proud of the record, that she had no debts and the orders had been dealt with, and that she would pay more promptly. In a written comment to SVT she said she understood that it was bad and could affect trust, that she had no debts left, and that she hoped people could still have confidence in her parliamentary work; she declined further interviews.
Aftonbladet also reported an open order for 1,480 kronor that Gothenburg Municipality had asked her to pay, while Kronofogden had requested more information from the city. The press secretary said that sum had been paid; the municipality said the matter was four unpaid invoices of 250 kronor each. SVT named press secretary Caroline Wiklund as disputing that a 1,480-krona claim from the city remained. Bengt Johansson, a media researcher at the University of Gothenburg, told Aftonbladet that such a record was “no merit”, and that Sweden has a low tolerance for economic scandals, weak control of personal finances, or self-enrichment, with scandals turning on taxpayers’ money.
In a profile published on 13 March 2019, Al Jazeera quoted Ali Elmi as saying she had become “a symbol of hate for extremists and racists” who saw her as a threat to what Swedish society should be, and also “a symbol of hope” for people she described as underrepresented.
On 10 October 2024, Minnesota state representative Samakab Hussein hosted Ali Elmi and Green Party colleague Janine Alm Ericson at the State Capitol for a roundtable on immigration policy. A Minnesota House release said they discussed services for new Americans, the situation of immigrants and refugees in Sweden, and barriers of language, culture and income, and quoted the two members calling the visit enriching and the state’s approach to diversity a model others could learn from.
On 25 January 2025 Omni reported her criticism of Mats Persson of the Liberals, identified there as integration minister, after he said that Somalis who came to Sweden had been met with benefits rather than clear requirements. Omni described Ali Elmi, the party’s labour-market spokesperson and herself Swedish-Somali, as calling that “otroligt ansvarslöst” (“incredibly irresponsible”). She told Göteborgs-Posten, as relayed by Omni, that the remark created stigmatization and division and damaged trust in society, and that the government should discuss unemployment rather than be “fixated” on ethnicity and look for scapegoats.
The programme of the Berlin Economic Forum, held in Potsdam from 3 to 6 March 2025, listed her on 3 March at 15:45 for a talk titled “Equality, Peace, and Prosperity: The True Foundations of a Just Green Transition.”
On 26 September 2026 Dagens Nyheter reported that an image of five Riksdag members of Somali background, including Ali Elmi, had spread internationally over the previous week, cast either as a symbol of hope and representation or as material in a racist narrative. DN stated that the picture was not genuine and had been made with artificial intelligence. Ali Elmi told the paper she did not know some of the people shown and had not been photographed with any of them.
How the record is sourced and how the score is derived.
The score is formula-derived (Factrail formula v1, version 1.0.0), not an editorial verdict. Read the methodology.
By the Factrail desk · Method: how we source and score · Last reviewed
Dispute a fact on this pageNamed here, or represent someone who is? Request a right of reply.
People and organizations as listed in the Related section of this page; facts, drivers and the pages that name it as listed in the blocks here. Counts, not a rating.