Skip to content
statementVerified

Monarchia argues imperial supremacy against papal plenitude; the book is a polarising political treatise, later condemned

Monarchia argues imperial supremacy against papal plenitude. The instrument is that polarising political treatise. In the causal graph this event strengthens Political Polarization, a driver that weakens Having a say in government — a worsening welfare path.

Read the full account

Monarchia argues imperial supremacy against papal plenitude. The instrument is that polarising political treatise. Later condemnation is reception, not his 1313 act. Dante Alighieri's documented role is: He wrote Monarchia. Later church condemnation is reception. Year-level around Henry VII's weather is conventional. Medium confidence on exact year.

Context

Henry VII is the named imperial hope. Sharing that emperor-weather is required. The setting of Monarchia argues imperial supremacy against papal plenitude; the book is a polarising political treatise, later condemned is the public file around 1313-01-01. Driver political-polarization is attached because the significance names a mechanism from this act, not because a standing list needed coverage.

Confidence is stated on the impact path, not hidden in adjectives. Later Index listings are not 1313. Mixed effects of Monarchia argues imperial supremacy against papal plenitude; the book is a polarising political treatise, later condemned are separate paths.

Why it matters

Worsening path from Monarchia argues imperial supremacy against papal plenitude; the book is a polarising political treatise, later condemned on 1313-01-01. A public anti-papal-plenitude treatise is a polarisation path. The welfare reading on this path is worsening.

That reading is an impact-path choice, not a property stored on the Fact itself.

Who was responsible

Contribution type and responsibility level for each recorded actor — not sole-author shorthand.

  • Direct responsibility

    responsibility level 0.36 · verified

    He wrote Monarchia. Later church condemnation is reception. Year-level around Henry VII's weather is conventional. Medium confidence on exact year.

What changed

Fact → Driver → Indicator. Relationship strength orders the paths; it is not the observed indicator movement.

    1. FactMonarchia argues imperial supremacy against papal plenitude; the book is a polarising political treatise, later condemned
    2. strengthensDriverPolitical Polarization
    3. weakensIndicators (2)Having a say in government
    Worsening path

    impact weight 0.35 · Effect from 1 January 1313 · verified

    A public anti-papal-plenitude treatise is a polarisation path.

    • Weakens · Relationship strength 0.16 (weight 0.35 × strength 0.45)

      Observed

      29.8% of population aged 16-65 years · 8.13 below the normal line (2023)

      Worse than normal

      Two readings: 30.2% of population aged 16-65 years (2021) and 29.8% of population aged 16-65 years (2023).

      20212023

      Above normal = better

    • Strengthens · Relationship strength 0.16 (weight 0.35 × strength 0.45)

      Observed

      43.9 Score · 43.9 above the normal line (2024)

      Worse than normal

      26 readings, 1996–2024: rose from 43 Score to 43.9 Score.

      Normal is zero · any amount = worse

Evidence

The sources behind this fact and its verification state.

Verified2 sources on file
  1. 1.Online Library of Liberty — De Monarchia as later English carrierOnline Library of Liberty · High credibility · verified
  2. 2.Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy — Dante, life and politics neighbourhoodStanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy · High credibility · verified
What the sources establish

Official locator: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy — Dante, Monarchia at https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/dante/ (opens in a new tab) (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy). Independent locator: Online Library of Liberty — De Monarchia as later English carrier at https://oll.libertyfund.org/titles/alighieri-de-monarchia (opens in a new tab) (Online Library of Liberty). Official carrier: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy — Dante, Monarchia (https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/dante/ (opens in a new tab); Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy). Independent carrier: Online Library of Liberty — De Monarchia as later English carrier (https://oll.libertyfund.org/titles/alighieri-de-monarchia (opens in a new tab); Online Library of Liberty).

Established: a sourced public record of Monarchia argues imperial supremacy against papal plenitude; the book is a polarising political treatise, later condemned under 1313-01-01 for Dante Alighieri. Established: a sourced public record of Monarchia argues imperial supremacy against papal plenitude; the book is a polarising political treatise, later condemned under 1313-01-01.

Shared responsibility is part of Monarchia argues imperial supremacy against papal plenitude; the book is a polarising political treatise, later condemned. Naming Dante Alighieri does not delete co-authors, institutions, or later transmitters. The lag from 1313-01-01 to any measured indicator is not treated as zero. Alternative explanations — weather, other armies, later statutes, or independent cultural change — remain live where the sources do not close them.

If a number is not in the two records named above, it is not supplied here.

Later competitions, monuments, translations, UNESCO listings, museums, and adaptations are not converted into extra lifetime acts.

Causal path

How this event connects to drivers and indicators in the graph.

  1. ActorDante Alighieri
  2. contributed toFactMonarchia argues imperial supremacy against papal plenitude; the book is a polarising political treatise, later condemned
  3. strengthensDriverPolitical Polarization
  4. weakensIndicatorHaving a say in government

Cite this page

Factrail. (2026). Monarchia argues imperial supremacy against papal plenitude; the book is a polarising political treatise, later condemned. Factrail. https://factrail.ai/facts/dan-monarchia-conflict

https://factrail.ai/facts/dan-monarchia-conflict

Accessed 16 October 2026.

By the · Method: how we source and score · Last reviewed

Dispute this factNamed here, or represent someone who is? Request a right of reply.