Skip to content
eventVerified

Dante stands with the White Guelphs against Black Guelphs and papal-French pressure, a factional alignment not a later party

Dante stood with the White Guelphs against Black Guelphs and papal-French pressure. The instrument is that factional alignment, not a later party brand. In the causal graph this event strengthens Political Polarization, a driver that weakens Having a say in government — a worsening welfare path.

Read the full account

Dante stood with the White Guelphs against Black Guelphs and papal-French pressure. The instrument is that factional alignment, not a later party brand. Dante Alighieri's documented role is: He is identified with the Whites. Corso Donati and Boniface VIII are counterparts. He did not command a modern party.

Context

Corso Donati is a named Black counterpart. Sharing that factional city is required. The setting of Dante stands with the White Guelphs against Black Guelphs and papal-French pressure, a factional alignment not a later party is the public file around 1301-01-01. Driver political-polarization is attached because the significance names a mechanism from this act, not because a standing list needed coverage.

Why it matters

Worsening path from Dante stands with the White Guelphs against Black Guelphs and papal-French pressure, a factional alignment not a later party on 1301-01-01. A named faction alignment that ends in exile is a polarisation path. The welfare reading on this path is worsening.

If a number is not in the two records named above, it is not supplied here.

Who was responsible

Contribution type and responsibility level for each recorded actor — not sole-author shorthand.

  • Direct responsibility

    responsibility level 0.44 · verified

    He is identified with the Whites. Corso Donati and Boniface VIII are counterparts. He did not command a modern party.

What changed

Fact → Driver → Indicator. Relationship strength orders the paths; it is not the observed indicator movement.

    1. FactDante stands with the White Guelphs against Black Guelphs and papal-French pressure, a factional alignment not a later party
    2. strengthensDriverPolitical Polarization
    3. weakensIndicators (2)Having a say in government
    Worsening path

    impact weight 0.4 · Effect from 1 January 1301 · verified

    A named faction alignment that ends in exile is a polarisation path.

    • Weakens · Relationship strength 0.18 (weight 0.4 × strength 0.45)

      Observed

      29.8% of population aged 16-65 years · 8.13 below the normal line (2023)

      Worse than normal

      Two readings: 30.2% of population aged 16-65 years (2021) and 29.8% of population aged 16-65 years (2023).

      20212023

      Above normal = better

    • Strengthens · Relationship strength 0.18 (weight 0.4 × strength 0.45)

      Observed

      43.9 Score · 43.9 above the normal line (2024)

      Worse than normal

      26 readings, 1996–2024: rose from 43 Score to 43.9 Score.

      Normal is zero · any amount = worse

Evidence

The sources behind this fact and its verification state.

Verified2 sources on file
  1. 1.Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy — Dante, life and politics neighbourhoodStanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy · High credibility · verified
  2. 2.Britannica — Dante Alighieri, Florentine political careerEncyclopaedia Britannica · High credibility · verified
What the sources establish

Official locator: Britannica — Dante, White Guelph neighbourhood at https://www.britannica.com/biography/Dante-Alighieri (opens in a new tab) (Encyclopaedia Britannica). Independent locator: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy — Dante, Florentine factions at https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/dante/ (opens in a new tab) (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy). Official carrier: Britannica — Dante, White Guelph neighbourhood (https://www.britannica.com/biography/Dante-Alighieri (opens in a new tab); Encyclopaedia Britannica). Independent carrier: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy — Dante, Florentine factions (https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/dante/ (opens in a new tab); Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy).

Established: a sourced public record of Dante stands with the White Guelphs against Black Guelphs and papal-French pressure, a factional alignment not a later party under 1301-01-01 for Dante Alighieri. Established: a sourced public record of Dante stands with the White Guelphs against Black Guelphs and papal-French pressure, a factional alignment not a later party under 1301-01-01.

Confidence is stated on the impact path, not hidden in adjectives. Mixed effects of Dante stands with the White Guelphs against Black Guelphs and papal-French pressure, a factional alignment not a later party are separate paths.

Later competitions, monuments, translations, UNESCO listings, museums, and adaptations are not converted into extra lifetime acts.

That reading is an impact-path choice, not a property stored on the Fact itself.

Shared responsibility is part of Dante stands with the White Guelphs against Black Guelphs and papal-French pressure, a factional alignment not a later party. Naming Dante Alighieri does not delete co-authors, institutions, or later transmitters. The lag from 1301-01-01 to any measured indicator is not treated as zero. Alternative explanations — weather, other armies, later statutes, or independent cultural change — remain live where the sources do not close them.

Causal path

How this event connects to drivers and indicators in the graph.

  1. ActorDante Alighieri
  2. contributed toFactDante stands with the White Guelphs against Black Guelphs and papal-French pressure, a factional alignment not a later party
  3. strengthensDriverPolitical Polarization
  4. weakensIndicatorHaving a say in government

Cite this page

Factrail. (2026). Dante stands with the White Guelphs against Black Guelphs and papal-French pressure, a factional alignment not a later party. Factrail. https://factrail.ai/facts/dan-white-guelph

https://factrail.ai/facts/dan-white-guelph

Accessed 16 October 2026.

By the · Method: how we source and score · Last reviewed

Dispute this factNamed here, or represent someone who is? Request a right of reply.