Passions of the Soul (1649) is a public treatise written with Princess Elisabeth's correspondence in view, one book not a unique pineal number
In 1649 Descartes published Passions of the Soul, a public treatise written with Princess Elisabeth's correspondence in view. It is one book, not a unique pineal number. In the causal graph this event strengthens Social Cohesion, a driver that strengthens Having a say in government — an improving welfare path.
Read the full account
In 1649 Descartes published Passions of the Soul, a public treatise written with Princess Elisabeth's correspondence in view. It is one book, not a unique pineal number. René Descartes's documented role is: He published Les Passions de l'âme. Elisabeth is the named counterpart of the preceding letters. The pineal seat is not upgraded to a coefficient.
Context
Elisabeth is the named correspondent. Sharing that letter-file is required. Christina's court is the later 1649 move. The setting of Passions of the Soul (1649) is a public treatise written with Princess Elisabeth's correspondence in view, one book not a unique pineal number is the public file around 1649-01-15. Driver social-cohesion is attached because the significance names a mechanism from this act, not because a standing list needed coverage.
Shared responsibility is part of Passions of the Soul (1649) is a public treatise written with Princess Elisabeth's correspondence in view, one book not a unique pineal number. Naming René Descartes does not delete co-authors, institutions, or later transmitters. The lag from 1649-01-15 to any measured indicator is not treated as zero. Alternative explanations — weather, other armies, later statutes, or independent cultural change — remain live where the sources do not close them.
Why it matters
Improving path from Passions of the Soul (1649) is a public treatise written with Princess Elisabeth's correspondence in view, one book not a unique pineal number on 1649-01-15. A public treatise of the passions is a cohesion path. The welfare reading on this path is improving.
Who was responsible
Contribution type and responsibility level for each recorded actor — not sole-author shorthand.
René Descartes
PersonDirect responsibility
responsibility level 0.44 · verified
He published Les Passions de l'âme. Elisabeth is the named counterpart of the preceding letters. The pineal seat is not upgraded to a coefficient.
What changed
Fact → Driver → Indicator. Relationship strength orders the paths; it is not the observed indicator movement.
- FactPassions of the Soul (1649) is a public treatise written with Princess Elisabeth's correspondence in view, one book not a unique pineal number
- strengthensDriverSocial Cohesion
- strengthensIndicators (2)Having a say in government
impact weight 0.4 · Effect from 15 January 1649 · verified
A public treatise of the passions is a cohesion path.
Strengthens · Relationship strength 0.18 (weight 0.4 × strength 0.45)
Observed
29.8% of population aged 16-65 years · 8.13 below the normal line (2023)
Worse than normalTwo readings: 30.2% of population aged 16-65 years (2021) and 29.8% of population aged 16-65 years (2023).
20212023 Above normal = better
Weakens · Relationship strength 0.18 (weight 0.4 × strength 0.45)
Observed
43.9 Score · 43.9 above the normal line (2024)
Worse than normal26 readings, 1996–2024: rose from 43 Score to 43.9 Score.
Normal is zero · any amount = worse
Evidence
The sources behind this fact and its verification state.
- 1.Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy — Elisabeth of Bohemia as correspondent neighbourhoodStanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy · High credibility · verified
- 2.Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy — Descartes, Dutch yearsStanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy · High credibility · verified
What the sources establish
Official locator: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy — Descartes, Passions of the Soul at https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/descartes/ (opens in a new tab) (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy). Independent locator: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy — Elisabeth of Bohemia as correspondent neighbourhood at https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/elisabeth-bohemia/ (opens in a new tab) (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy). Official carrier: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy — Descartes, Passions of the Soul (https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/descartes/ (opens in a new tab); Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy). Independent carrier: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy — Elisabeth of Bohemia as correspondent neighbourhood (https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/elisabeth-bohemia/ (opens in a new tab); Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy).
Established: a sourced public record of Passions of the Soul (1649) is a public treatise written with Princess Elisabeth's correspondence in view, one book not a unique pineal number under 1649-01-15 for René Descartes. Established: a sourced public record of Passions of the Soul (1649) is a public treatise written with Princess Elisabeth's correspondence in view, one book not a unique pineal number under 1649-01-15.
Later competitions, monuments, translations, UNESCO listings, museums, and adaptations are not converted into extra lifetime acts.
If a number is not in the two records named above, it is not supplied here.
Confidence is stated on the impact path, not hidden in adjectives. The pineal-limit row is the refusal twin. Mixed effects of Passions of the Soul (1649) is a public treatise written with Princess Elisabeth's correspondence in view, one book not a unique pineal number are separate paths.
That reading is an impact-path choice, not a property stored on the Fact itself.
Causal path
How this event connects to drivers and indicators in the graph.
- ActorRené Descartes
- contributed toFactPassions of the Soul (1649) is a public treatise written with Princess Elisabeth's correspondence in view, one book not a unique pineal number
- strengthensDriverSocial Cohesion
- strengthensIndicatorHaving a say in government
Cite this page
Factrail. (2026). Passions of the Soul (1649) is a public treatise written with Princess Elisabeth's correspondence in view, one book not a unique pineal number. Factrail. https://factrail.ai/facts/des-passions-1649
https://factrail.ai/facts/des-passions-1649
Accessed 15 October 2026.
By the Factrail desk · Method: how we source and score · Last reviewed
Dispute this factNamed here, or represent someone who is? Request a right of reply.