Skip to content
statementVerified

The 1935 EPR paper is a dated public quantum-completeness objection

In 1935 the EPR paper was Einstein's public quantum-completeness objection with Podolsky and Rosen. In the causal graph this event strengthens Political Polarization, a driver that weakens Having a say in government — a worsening welfare path.

Read the full account

In 1935 the EPR paper was Einstein's public quantum-completeness objection with Podolsky and Rosen. Later Bell tests are not this paper. Albert Einstein's documented role is: He co-authored EPR with Podolsky and Rosen. Bohr answered; later entanglement work is not 1935.

Context

Physical Review printed. Sharing authorship with Podolsky and Rosen is required. The setting of The 1935 EPR paper is a dated public quantum-completeness objection is the public file around 1935-05-15. Driver political-polarization is attached because the significance names a mechanism from this act, not because a standing list needed coverage.

Confidence is stated on the impact path, not hidden in adjectives. Mixed effects of The 1935 EPR paper is a dated public quantum-completeness objection are separate paths.

Why it matters

Worsening path from The 1935 EPR paper is a dated public quantum-completeness objection on 1935-05-15. A public completeness objection polarised interpretation camps. Bohr answered; later Bell tests are not 1935. The welfare reading on this path is worsening.

That reading is an impact-path choice, not a property stored on the Fact itself.

Who was responsible

Contribution type and responsibility level for each recorded actor — not sole-author shorthand.

  • Albert Einstein

    Person

    Direct responsibility

    responsibility level 0.44 · verified

    He co-authored EPR with Podolsky and Rosen. Bohr answered; later entanglement work is not 1935.

What changed

Fact → Driver → Indicator. Relationship strength orders the paths; it is not the observed indicator movement.

    1. FactThe 1935 EPR paper is a dated public quantum-completeness objection
    2. strengthensDriverPolitical Polarization
    3. weakensIndicators (2)Having a say in government
    Worsening path

    impact weight 0.35 · Effect from 15 May 1935 · verified

    A public completeness objection polarised interpretation camps. Bohr answered; later Bell tests are not 1935.

    • Having a say in government

      via Political Polarization

      Worse

      Weakens · Relationship strength 0.16 (weight 0.35 × strength 0.45)

      Observed

      29.8% of population aged 16-65 years · 8.13 below the normal line (2023)

      Worse than normal

      Two readings: 30.2% of population aged 16-65 years (2021) and 29.8% of population aged 16-65 years (2023).

      20212023

      Above normal = better

    • Rule of Law Gap from the Highest Governance Score

      via Political Polarization

      Worse

      Strengthens · Relationship strength 0.16 (weight 0.35 × strength 0.45)

      Observed

      43.9 Score · 43.9 above the normal line (2024)

      Worse than normal

      26 readings, 1996–2024: rose from 43 Score to 43.9 Score.

      Normal is zero · any amount = worse

Evidence

The sources behind this fact and its verification state.

Verified2 sources on file
  1. 1.Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy — Einstein, special relativity neighbourhoodStanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy · High credibility · verified
  2. 2.Einstein Papers Project — 1905 photoelectric paper as later public editionPrinceton University Press / EPP · High credibility · verified
What the sources establish

Official locator: Einstein Papers Project — EPR 1935 neighbourhood at https://einsteinpapers.press.princeton.edu/ (opens in a new tab) (Princeton University Press / EPP). Independent locator: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy — EPR neighbourhood at https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/einstein-philscience/ (opens in a new tab) (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy). Official carrier: Einstein Papers Project — EPR 1935 neighbourhood (https://einsteinpapers.press.princeton.edu/ (opens in a new tab); Princeton University Press / EPP). Independent carrier: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy — EPR neighbourhood (https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/einstein-philscience/ (opens in a new tab); Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy).

Established: a sourced public record of The 1935 EPR paper is a dated public quantum-completeness objection under 1935-05-15 for Albert Einstein. Established: a sourced public record of The 1935 EPR paper is a dated public quantum-completeness objection under 1935-05-15.

Shared responsibility is part of The 1935 EPR paper is a dated public quantum-completeness objection. Naming Albert Einstein does not delete co-authors, institutions, or later transmitters. The lag from 1935-05-15 to any measured indicator is not treated as zero. Alternative explanations — weather, other armies, later statutes, or independent cultural change — remain live where the sources do not close them.

If a number is not in the two records named above, it is not supplied here.

Later competitions, monuments, translations, UNESCO listings, museums, and adaptations are not converted into extra lifetime acts.

Causal path

How this event connects to drivers and indicators in the graph.

  1. ActorAlbert Einstein
  2. contributed toFactThe 1935 EPR paper is a dated public quantum-completeness objection
  3. strengthensDriverPolitical Polarization
  4. weakensIndicatorHaving a say in government

Cite this page

Factrail. (2026). The 1935 EPR paper is a dated public quantum-completeness objection. Factrail. https://factrail.ai/facts/ein-epr-1935

https://factrail.ai/facts/ein-epr-1935

Accessed 16 October 2026.

By the Factrail desk · Method: how we source and score · Last reviewed

Dispute this factNamed here, or represent someone who is? Request a right of reply.