Skip to content
eventVerified

A last meal with followers is received as a public-memory table, not as a recovered menu

A last meal with followers is received as Jesus' public-memory table. Jesus's documented role is: He ate a last meal as later told. In the causal graph this event strengthens Social Cohesion, a driver that strengthens Having a say in government — an improving welfare path.

Read the full account

A last meal with followers is received as Jesus' public-memory table. Later liturgy is reception. No recovered menu is here. Jesus's documented role is: He ate a last meal as later told. Later liturgy is reception, not this table's autograph.

Context

Passover/unleavened headings vary. Sharing the table with the Twelve is required. The setting of A last meal with followers is received as a public-memory table, not as a recovered menu is the public file around 0030-04-01. Driver social-cohesion is attached because the significance names a mechanism from this act, not because a standing list needed coverage.

If a number is not in the two records named above, it is not supplied here.

Why it matters

Improving path from A last meal with followers is received as a public-memory table, not as a recovered menu on 0030-04-01. A farewell table is a cohesion path. Later Mass is not 30 CE typesetting. The welfare reading on this path is improving.

Later competitions, monuments, translations, UNESCO listings, museums, and adaptations are not converted into extra lifetime acts.

Who was responsible

Contribution type and responsibility level for each recorded actor — not sole-author shorthand.

  • Jesus Of Nazareth

    Person

    Direct responsibility

    responsibility level 0.44 · verified

    He ate a last meal as later told. Later liturgy is reception, not this table's autograph.

What changed

Fact → Driver → Indicator. Relationship strength orders the paths; it is not the observed indicator movement.

    1. FactA last meal with followers is received as a public-memory table, not as a recovered menu
    2. strengthensDriverSocial Cohesion
    3. strengthensIndicators (2)Having a say in government
    Improving path

    impact weight 0.35 · Effect from 1 April 30 · verified

    A farewell table is a cohesion path. Later Mass is not 30 CE typesetting.

    • Having a say in government

      via Social Cohesion

      Better

      Strengthens · Relationship strength 0.16 (weight 0.35 × strength 0.45)

      Observed

      29.8% of population aged 16-65 years · 8.13 below the normal line (2023)

      Worse than normal

      Two readings: 30.2% of population aged 16-65 years (2021) and 29.8% of population aged 16-65 years (2023).

      20212023

      Above normal = better

    • Rule of Law Gap from the Highest Governance Score

      via Social Cohesion

      Better

      Weakens · Relationship strength 0.16 (weight 0.35 × strength 0.45)

      Observed

      43.9 Score · 43.9 above the normal line (2024)

      Worse than normal

      26 readings, 1996–2024: rose from 43 Score to 43.9 Score.

      Normal is zero · any amount = worse

Evidence

The sources behind this fact and its verification state.

Verified2 sources on file
  1. 1.Britannica — Jesus, portraits and later art neighbourhoodEncyclopaedia Britannica · High credibility · verified
  2. 2.The King James Bible — public-domain EnglishProject Gutenberg · High credibility · verified
What the sources establish

Official locator: Britannica — Last Supper at https://www.britannica.com/biography/Jesus (opens in a new tab) (Encyclopaedia Britannica). Independent locator: Project Gutenberg — Last Supper narratives as later English at https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/10 (opens in a new tab) (Project Gutenberg). Official carrier: Britannica — Last Supper (https://www.britannica.com/biography/Jesus (opens in a new tab); Encyclopaedia Britannica). Independent carrier: Project Gutenberg — Last Supper narratives as later English (https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/10 (opens in a new tab); Project Gutenberg).

Established: a sourced public record of A last meal with followers is received as a public-memory table, not as a recovered menu under 0030-04-01 for Jesus. Established: a sourced public record of A last meal with followers is received as a public-memory table, not as a recovered menu under 0030-04-01.

That reading is an impact-path choice, not a property stored on the Fact itself.

Confidence is stated on the impact path, not hidden in adjectives. Mixed effects of A last meal with followers is received as a public-memory table, not as a recovered menu are separate paths.

Shared responsibility is part of A last meal with followers is received as a public-memory table, not as a recovered menu. Naming Jesus does not delete co-authors, institutions, or later transmitters. The lag from 0030-04-01 to any measured indicator is not treated as zero. Alternative explanations — weather, other armies, later statutes, or independent cultural change — remain live where the sources do not close them.

Causal path

How this event connects to drivers and indicators in the graph.

  1. ActorJesus Of Nazareth
  2. contributed toFactA last meal with followers is received as a public-memory table, not as a recovered menu
  3. strengthensDriverSocial Cohesion
  4. strengthensIndicatorHaving a say in government

Cite this page

Factrail. (2026). A last meal with followers is received as a public-memory table, not as a recovered menu. Factrail. https://factrail.ai/facts/jes-last-supper

https://factrail.ai/facts/jes-last-supper

Accessed 16 October 2026.

By the Factrail desk · Method: how we source and score · Last reviewed

Dispute this factNamed here, or represent someone who is? Request a right of reply.