Skip to content
statementVerified

Shaftesbury service in the exclusion-era faction is a completed polarising office

Dated 1 January 1679: Shaftesbury service in the exclusion-era faction is a completed polarising office. In the causal graph this event strengthens Political Polarization, a driver that weakens Having a say in government — a worsening welfare path.

Sources: [1][2]

Read the full account

A secretary in a succession fight. Shared patron. John Locke did not operate this later page as a civil-registry autograph.

Context

Shared institutions, unnamed crews, and later editors remain in the record and do not erase a documented heading.

John Locke Shared work with other named actors remains in the record.

John Locke’s documented role is bounded by other offices and collaborators named in the sources below.

Conventional 1632–1704.

Why it matters

A secretary in a succession fight. Shared patron.

Who was responsible

Contribution type and responsibility level for each recorded actor — not sole-author shorthand.

  • John Locke

    Person

    Direct responsibility

    responsibility level 0.32 · verified

What changed

Fact → Driver → Indicator. Relationship strength orders the paths; it is not the observed indicator movement.

    1. FactShaftesbury service in the exclusion-era faction is a completed polarising office
    2. strengthensDriverPolitical Polarization
    3. weakensIndicators (2)Having a say in government
    Worsening path

    impact weight 0.4 · Effect from 1 January 1679 · verified

    A secretary in a succession fight. Shared patron.

    • Having a say in government

      via Political Polarization

      Worse

      Weakens · Relationship strength 0.18 (weight 0.4 × strength 0.45)

      Observed

      29.8% of population aged 16-65 years · 8.13 below the normal line (2023)

      Worse than normal

      Two readings: 30.2% of population aged 16-65 years (2021) and 29.8% of population aged 16-65 years (2023).

      20212023

      Above normal = better

    • Rule of Law Gap from the Highest Governance Score

      via Political Polarization

      Worse

      Strengthens · Relationship strength 0.18 (weight 0.4 × strength 0.45)

      Observed

      43.9 Score · 43.9 above the normal line (2024)

      Worse than normal

      26 readings, 1996–2024: rose from 43 Score to 43.9 Score.

      Normal is zero · any amount = worse

Evidence

The sources behind this fact and its verification state.

Verified2 sources on file
  1. 1.Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy — John LockeStanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy · High credibility · verified
  2. 2.Britannica — John LockeEncyclopaedia Britannica · High credibility · verified
What the sources establish

John Locke did not file a later UNESCO form, a later Loeb colophon, or a later museum label as a personal act.

Causal path

How this event connects to drivers and indicators in the graph.

  1. ActorJohn Locke
  2. contributed toFactShaftesbury service in the exclusion-era faction is a completed polarising office
  3. strengthensDriverPolitical Polarization
  4. weakensIndicatorHaving a say in government

Cite this page

Factrail. (2026). Shaftesbury service in the exclusion-era faction is a completed polarising office. Factrail. https://factrail.ai/facts/jlk-shaftesbury-exclusion

https://factrail.ai/facts/jlk-shaftesbury-exclusion

Accessed 16 October 2026.

By the Factrail desk · Method: how we source and score · Last reviewed

Dispute this factNamed here, or represent someone who is? Request a right of reply.