
On 15 November 2023, the UK Supreme Court unanimously ruled that the government's plan to remove asylum seekers to Rwanda for processing was unlawful. The court found substantial grounds to believe that people sent to Rwanda would face a real risk of refoulement, being returned to countries where they could face ill-treatment, citing UNHCR evidence of systemic defects in Rwanda's asylum system. The judgment did not stop the government, then led by Prime Minister Rishi Sunak, from signing a treaty with Rwanda and pursuing the Safety of Rwanda Act.
On 15 November 2023, the UK Supreme Court unanimously ruled that the government's plan to remove asylum seekers to Rwanda for processing was unlawful. The court found substantial grounds to believe that people sent to Rwanda would face a real risk of refoulement, being returned to countries where they could face ill-treatment, citing UNHCR evidence of systemic defects in Rwanda's asylum system. The judgment did not stop the government, then led by Prime Minister Rishi Sunak, from signing a treaty with Rwanda and pursuing the Safety of Rwanda Act.
This fact’s slice of Factrail’s verified causal web — the people, facts, drivers and welfare indicators it connects to. Select any node to trace a path.
Loading network…
By striking down the offshore-removal scheme, the ruling reduced the reach of a restrictive deportation policy.