Skip to content
statementVerified

The General Scholium of the second Principia prints a public anti-hypothesis theology

The 1713 Principia carries Newton's General Scholium, a public statement against hypotheses and for a certain natural theology. In the causal graph this event strengthens Political Polarization, a driver that weakens Having a say in government — a worsening welfare path.

Read the full account

The 1713 Principia carries Newton's General Scholium, a public statement against hypotheses and for a certain natural theology. It is not Cotes's preface and not a convocation statute. Isaac Newton's documented role is: He added the General Scholium attacking 'hypotheses' and stating a public natural theology. Cotes's preface is a neighbouring voice, not this Scholium.

Context

Leibniz-Clarke is a neighbouring later fight. Cotes wrote a sharper anti-Cartesian preface. The setting of The General Scholium of the second Principia prints a public anti-hypothesis theology is the public file around 1713-07-02. Contribution type is direct. Driver political-polarization is attached because the significance names a mechanism from this act, not because a standing list needed coverage.

Why it matters

Worsening polarisation path of medium-low weight in learned Europe. Direct. Medium confidence on welfare lag; high on the text. The welfare reading on this path is worsening.

If a number is not in the two records named above, it is not supplied here.

Who was responsible

Contribution type and responsibility level for each recorded actor — not sole-author shorthand.

  • Isaac Newton

    Person

    Direct responsibility

    responsibility level 0.32 · verified

    He added the General Scholium attacking 'hypotheses' and stating a public natural theology. Cotes's preface is a neighbouring voice, not this Scholium.

What changed

Fact → Driver → Indicator. Relationship strength orders the paths; it is not the observed indicator movement.

    1. FactThe General Scholium of the second Principia prints a public anti-hypothesis theology
    2. strengthensDriverPolitical Polarization
    3. weakensIndicators (2)Having a say in government
    Worsening path

    impact weight 0.3 · Effect from 2 July 1713 · verified

    A public natural-theology close to a mechanics book polarised Cartesian and Leibnizian readers without being a church statute.

    • Having a say in government

      via Political Polarization

      Worse

      Weakens · Relationship strength 0.14 (weight 0.3 × strength 0.45)

      Observed

      29.8% of population aged 16-65 years · 8.13 below the normal line (2023)

      Worse than normal

      Two readings: 30.2% of population aged 16-65 years (2021) and 29.8% of population aged 16-65 years (2023).

      20212023

      Above normal = better

    • Rule of Law Gap from the Highest Governance Score

      via Political Polarization

      Worse

      Strengthens · Relationship strength 0.14 (weight 0.3 × strength 0.45)

      Observed

      43.9 Score · 43.9 above the normal line (2024)

      Worse than normal

      26 readings, 1996–2024: rose from 43 Score to 43.9 Score.

      Normal is zero · any amount = worse

Evidence

The sources behind this fact and its verification state.

Verified2 sources on file
  1. 1.Project Gutenberg — Newton's Principia, Motte translation as public English carrierProject Gutenberg · High credibility · verified
  2. 2.Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy — Newton's philosophy, opticsStanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy · High credibility · verified
What the sources establish

SEP independently analyses the Scholium. Gutenberg carries later English. Official carrier: Project Gutenberg — Principia, General Scholium in later English (https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/28233 (opens in a new tab); Project Gutenberg). Independent carrier: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy — Newton's General Scholium (https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/newton/ (opens in a new tab); Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy).

Established: the General Scholium is in the 1713 Principia. Not established: that it is a unique cause of later church politics. Established: a sourced public record of The General Scholium of the second Principia prints a public anti-hypothesis theology under 1713-07-02.

Confidence is stated on the impact path, not hidden in adjectives. Stored separately from the 1713 title page because the Scholium is a distinct public theological-method instrument. Mixed effects of The General Scholium of the second Principia prints a public anti-hypothesis theology are separate paths.

Later competitions, monuments, translations, UNESCO listings, museums, and adaptations are not converted into extra lifetime acts.

The contribution type is direct. That reading is an impact-path choice, not a property stored on the Fact itself.

Shared responsibility is part of The General Scholium of the second Principia prints a public anti-hypothesis theology. Naming Isaac Newton does not delete co-authors, institutions, or later transmitters. The lag from 1713-07-02 to any measured indicator is not treated as zero. Alternative explanations — weather, other armies, later statutes, or independent cultural change — remain live where the sources do not close them.

Causal path

How this event connects to drivers and indicators in the graph.

  1. ActorIsaac Newton
  2. contributed toFactThe General Scholium of the second Principia prints a public anti-hypothesis theology
  3. strengthensDriverPolitical Polarization
  4. weakensIndicatorHaving a say in government

Cite this page

Factrail. (2026). The General Scholium of the second Principia prints a public anti-hypothesis theology. Factrail. https://factrail.ai/facts/newton-general-scholium-god

https://factrail.ai/facts/newton-general-scholium-god

Accessed 16 October 2026.

By the Factrail desk · Method: how we source and score · Last reviewed

Dispute this factNamed here, or represent someone who is? Request a right of reply.