Skip to content
actionVerified

Philippines suspends Dengvaxia dengue-vaccination program after Sanofi safety warning (2017)

After the Philippine Department of Health introduced Dengvaxia in a school-based programme, Sanofi advised in November 2017 that vaccination could increase the risk of severe dengue in people without prior infection. In the causal graph this event strengthens Vaccine hesitancy and erosion of public trust in immunization, a driver that weakens First-dose measles vaccination coverage (global, MCV1) — a worsening welfare path.

Read the full account

After the Philippine Department of Health introduced Dengvaxia in a school-based programme, Sanofi advised in November 2017 that vaccination could increase the risk of severe dengue in people without prior infection. The department suspended the programme.

Who was responsible

Contribution type and responsibility level for each recorded actor — not sole-author shorthand.

No public contributors are listed for this fact.

What changed

Fact → Driver → Indicator. Relationship strength orders the paths; it is not the observed indicator movement.

Evidence

The sources behind this fact and its verification state.

Verified
What the sources establish

This record covers the documented programme and safety response without assigning individual legal culpability.

Causal path

How this event connects to drivers and indicators in the graph.

  1. FactPhilippines suspends Dengvaxia dengue-vaccination program after Sanofi safety warning (2017)
  2. strengthensDriverVaccine hesitancy and erosion of public trust in immunization
  3. weakensIndicatorFirst-dose measles vaccination coverage (global, MCV1)

Cite this page

Factrail. (2026). Philippines suspends Dengvaxia dengue-vaccination program after Sanofi safety warning (2017). Factrail. https://factrail.ai/facts/ph-fact-dengvaxia-suspension-2017

https://factrail.ai/facts/ph-fact-dengvaxia-suspension-2017

Accessed 15 October 2026.

By the Factrail desk · Method: how we source and score · Last reviewed

Dispute this factNamed here, or represent someone who is? Request a right of reply.