The Almagest star catalogue is a public file later audited as possible Hipparchan reuse, not a proven theft
Late-20th-century papers indexed on NASA ADS, following Grasshoff and earlier Delambre/Tycho arguments, print a public debate that Ptolemy’s star catalogue may be a reduced Hipparchan file rather than a fully independent Alexandrian observation set. It is an allegation-and-audit cluster, not a proven theft conviction. In the causal graph this event strengthens Institutional Corruption, a driver that strengthens Political corruption index — a worsening welfare path.
Read the full account
Late-20th-century papers indexed on NASA ADS, following Grasshoff and earlier Delambre/Tycho arguments, print a public debate that Ptolemy’s star catalogue may be a reduced Hipparchan file rather than a fully independent Alexandrian observation set. It is an allegation-and-audit cluster, not a proven theft conviction.
Context
Do store the published audit as an opacity path of medium confidence. Hipparchus has his own identity.
Ptolemy’s documented role is bounded by other offices and collaborators named in the sources below.
Conventional floruit is the mid-2nd century CE in Roman Alexandria.
Who was responsible
Contribution type and responsibility level for each recorded actor — not sole-author shorthand.
Ptolemy
PersonDirect responsibility
responsibility level 0.32 · verified
What changed
Fact → Driver → Indicator. Relationship strength orders the paths; it is not the observed indicator movement.
- FactThe Almagest star catalogue is a public file later audited as possible Hipparchan reuse, not a proven theft
- strengthensDriverInstitutional Corruption
- strengthensIndicators (3)Political corruption index
impact weight 0.4 · Effect from 1 March 150 · verified
Strengthens · Relationship strength 0.3 (weight 0.4 × strength 0.76)
Observed
0.48 score from 0 to 1 · 0.29 above the normal line (2024)
Worse than normal125 readings, 1900–2024: rose from 0.4 score from 0 to 1 to 0.48 score from 0 to 1.
Above normal = worse
Weakens · Relationship strength 0.25 (weight 0.4 × strength 0.62)
Observed
56.1 Score · 13.7 below the normal line (2024)
Worse than normal26 readings, 1996–2024: fell from 57 Score to 56.1 Score.
Above normal = better
Weakens · Relationship strength 0.2 (weight 0.4 × strength 0.5)
Observed
42.5 index score (0-100) · 7.53 below the normal line (2025)
Worse than normalAbove normal = better
Evidence
The sources behind this fact and its verification state.
- 1.MacTutor — Hipparchus, the predecessor named in Almagest debatesUniversity of St Andrews · High credibility · verified
- 2.NASA ADS — modern papers on the Almagest and star catalogueNASA Astrophysics Data System · High credibility · verified
What the sources establish
Driver institutional-corruption is attached because the Significance sentence names a mechanism from The Almagest star catalogue is a public file later audited as possible Hipparchan reuse, not a proven theft at 0150-03-01, not because a standing driver list needed coverage. Official page: https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/ (opens in a new tab). Independent page: https://mathshistory.st-andrews.ac.uk/Biographies/Hipparchus/ (opens in a new tab).
Causal path
How this event connects to drivers and indicators in the graph.
- ActorPtolemy
- contributed toFactThe Almagest star catalogue is a public file later audited as possible Hipparchan reuse, not a proven theft
- strengthensDriverInstitutional Corruption
- strengthensIndicatorPolitical corruption index
Cite this page
Factrail. (2026). The Almagest star catalogue is a public file later audited as possible Hipparchan reuse, not a proven theft. Factrail. https://factrail.ai/facts/pto-star-catalogue-hipparchus-debate
https://factrail.ai/facts/pto-star-catalogue-hipparchus-debate
Accessed 16 October 2026.
By the Factrail desk · Method: how we source and score · Last reviewed
Dispute this factNamed here, or represent someone who is? Request a right of reply.