Skip to content
Trajan

Trajan

0

Near balanceFormula-derived score

Roman emperor whose Dacian wars, Column, alimenta tables, and Pliny rescripts reach the public through Dio, Loeb, inscriptions, and the Markets museum. Documented harms: conquest, Christian obstinacy penalty, war-finance. He did not typeset 1920.

Optimus Princeps administration as later written rescriptsDacian conquest as a conserved war-spiralalimenta as estate-loan child support not a welfare state

Impact

Not rated yet: the verified records linked to this person, without a numeric impact.

Editorial assessment (context, not the score)

The page is not a marble Optimus and not a unique author of 117 CE. The heaviest documented costs in public English are Dacian conquest, the Column as war-art, and Pliny’s obstinacy penalty. The offsets are alimenta tables, aqueduct and road publication, Portus, and museum access. He did not file 1920. Editors and conservators did that work. Confidence is high on those pages, medium on unique war-finance. Later museum pages remain the dated record.

Indicators affected

Indicators this person’s verified facts reach. No score contribution is assigned; the observed state is the indicator’s own reading.

Accountability & contradictions

Claims against the record, the type of responsibility, and what is disputed.

Causal path

Person → Fact → Driver → Indicator. Select a path to inspect its factors; the full network opens on demand.

Timeline

The most relevant dated facts, newest first.

Evidence & methodology

How the record is sourced and how the score is derived.

30 of 30 linked facts verified, drawing on 11 distinct sources (0097–0116).

Sources include University of Chicago / LacusCurtius, Encyclopaedia Britannica, Ostia Antica project, Roma Capitale, Sovrintendenza Capitolina ai Beni Culturali, Perseus Digital Library / Tufts, Universität Heidelberg, UNESCO World Heritage Centre.

Sources (showing 8 of 11)

  1. 1.Britannica — TrajanEncyclopaedia Britannica
  2. 2.LacusCurtius — Cassius DioUniversity of Chicago / LacusCurtius
  3. 3.Sovrintendenza Capitolina — Column of Marcus AureliusSovrintendenza Capitolina ai Beni Culturali
  4. 4.Epigraphic Database Heidelberg — alimenta and Trajanic inscriptionsUniversität Heidelberg
  5. 5.Perseus — Pliny the Younger, LettersPerseus Digital Library / Tufts
  6. 6.Britannica — Arch of Trajan, BeneventoEncyclopaedia Britannica
  7. 7.Ostia Antica — harbour city research pagesOstia Antica project
  8. 8.Mercati di Traiano — Museo dei Fori ImperialiRoma Capitale

The score is formula-derived (Factrail formula v1, version 1.0.0), not an editorial verdict. Read the methodology.

By the Factrail desk · Method: how we source and score · Last reviewed · Sources: 11

Expert analysis

An excerpt; the full analysis opens on request.

The first fact about Trajan in a public catalog is a war-spiral and a rescript that keeps a death penalty for religious obstinacy, not a marble Optimus. Loeb Pliny at https://www.hup.harvard.edu/books/9780674990661 (opens in a new tab) and Perseus https://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus:text:1999.02.0139 (opens in a new tab) print Letters 10.96–97: hunt no one, ignore anonymous lists, punish those who persist. Britannica at https://www.britannica.com/biography/Trajan (opens in a new tab) does not make him a recusant’s friend. LacusCurtius Dio at https://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Cassius_Dio/home.html (opens in a new tab) prints Dacia and the eastern gamble. Sovrintendenza pages at https://www.sovraintendenzaroma.it/ (opens in a new tab) and UNESCO Rome at https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/91/ (opens in a new tab) present a spiral of conquest. Orastie fortresses at https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/598/ (opens in a new tab) are a Dacian landscape after defeat. EDH at https://edh.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/ (opens in a new tab) publishes alimenta tables that sit on estates. Mercati di Traiano at https://www.mercatiditraiano.it/en (opens in a new tab) is both a labour monument and a museum. The offsets are also URLs. The same Pliny book is written administration. Ostia pages at https://www.ostia-antica.org/ (opens in a new tab) print the hexagonal basin. Glyptothek presentation at https://www.antike-am-koenigsplatz.mwn.de/en/glyptothek-munich.html (opens in a new tab) is a public face-type. Cambridge companions supply independent limits. What the score must not say: that he abolished slavery; that 10.97 is a toleration edict; that 106 is a GPS body count; that a 2007 museum is 112 CE. Complex contribution is the honest type. Confidence is high on Pliny, the Column, and published stones, medium on unique fiscal coefficients, low on games epidemiology. Related people are Hadrian, Pliny, Apollodorus, Decebalus, Nerva, Plotina. 1920 Loeb is not 112. 1980 is UNESCO. 2007 is a museum. The useful question is which later public pages still move conquest, minority penalty, and child-support tables under his name. Keep Column Pliny alimenta and Portus on separate dates. Later Loeb, UNESCO, and encyclopedia pages are evidence, not additional acts. Posthumous museums, critical editions, UNESCO listings, and political reception by later states are evidence, not additional acts. Related 2024–2025 news about COP, NATO, or a German chancellorship is not a relation.

Dispute a fact on this pageNamed here, or represent someone who is? Request a right of reply.