Loeb Libation Bearers prints a revenge-instruction that a blood debt must be paid in blood
Smyth’s Loeb Choephoroi gives English readers Orestes’ matricide as commanded revenge, the middle play before the court. In the causal graph this event weakens Judicial independence erosion (court capture), a driver that strengthens Rule of Law Gap from the Highest Governance Score — an improving welfare path.
Read the full account
Smyth’s Loeb Choephoroi gives English readers Orestes’ matricide as commanded revenge, the middle play before the court.
Context
A trilogy can move from feud to court. Storing only the court would sanitize.
Aeschylus is not the sole author of every later object, law, or museum label that uses the name. Shared work with courts, excavators, printers, spouses, officials, and later states does not erase a documented role, and it does not make an ancient person the signer of a twentieth-century statute.
Why it matters
A printed matricide is not a holding of the Areopagus.
Who was responsible
Contribution type and responsibility level for each recorded actor — not sole-author shorthand.
Aeschylus
PersonDirect responsibility
responsibility level 0.28 · verified
Transmitted plays under his name plus later editors, actors, or states. Complex, not an autograph of 458.
What changed
Fact → Driver → Indicator. Relationship strength orders the paths; it is not the observed indicator movement.
- FactLoeb Libation Bearers prints a revenge-instruction that a blood debt must be paid in blood
- weakensDriverJudicial independence erosion (court capture)
- strengthensIndicators (4)Rule of Law Gap from the Highest Governance Score
impact weight 0.35 · Effect from 1 April 1922 · verified
A printed matricide is not a holding of the Areopagus.
- Better
Strengthens · Relationship strength 0.25 (weight 0.35 × strength 0.72)
Observed
43.9 Score · 43.9 above the normal line (2024)
Worse than normal26 readings, 1996–2024: rose from 43 Score to 43.9 Score.
Normal is zero · any amount = worse
Weakens · Relationship strength 0.24 (weight 0.35 × strength 0.7)
Observed
0.55 index score (0-1) · 0.26 below the normal line (2024)
Worse than normalAbove normal = better
Weakens · Relationship strength 0.24 (weight 0.35 × strength 0.69)
Observed
0.62 score from 0 to 1 · 0.25 below the normal line (2024)
Worse than normal125 readings, 1900–2024: rose from 0.37 score from 0 to 1 to 0.62 score from 0 to 1.
Above normal = better
All indicators on this path (4)
- Better
Weakens · Relationship strength 0.1 (weight 0.35 × strength 0.3)
Observed
42.5 index score (0-100) · 7.53 below the normal line (2025)
Worse than normalAbove normal = better
Evidence
The sources behind this fact and its verification state.
- 1.Britannica — OresteiaEncyclopaedia Britannica · High credibility · verified
- 2.Perseus — Aeschylus, Agamemnon (Smyth)Perseus Digital Library / Tufts · High credibility · verified
What the sources establish
Later competitions, monuments, translations, UNESCO listings, and museums are not converted into extra lifetime acts. That reading is an impact-path choice, not a property stored on the Fact itself. Confidence is stated on the impact path. A later English edition is not a recovered autograph. If a number is not in the two records named above, it is not supplied here. Confidence is stated on the impact path.
Causal path
How this event connects to drivers and indicators in the graph.
- ActorAeschylus
- contributed toFactLoeb Libation Bearers prints a revenge-instruction that a blood debt must be paid in blood
- weakensDriverJudicial independence erosion (court capture)
- strengthensIndicatorRule of Law Gap from the Highest Governance Score
Cite this page
Factrail. (2026). Loeb Libation Bearers prints a revenge-instruction that a blood debt must be paid in blood. Factrail. https://factrail.ai/facts/ae-justice-blood-price-as-printed
https://factrail.ai/facts/ae-justice-blood-price-as-printed
Accessed 15 October 2026.
By the Factrail desk · Method: how we source and score · Last reviewed
Dispute this factNamed here, or represent someone who is? Request a right of reply.