The Malleus Maleficarum prints scholastic demonology that cites Thomist headings
In 1486–87 the Malleus Maleficarum was printed, a completed inquisitorial handbook that leans on scholastic angelology and the Summa’s demonology cluster. In the causal graph this event strengthens Judicial independence erosion (court capture), a driver that strengthens Rule of Law Gap from the Highest Governance Score — a worsening welfare path.
Read the full account
In 1486–87 the Malleus Maleficarum was printed, a completed inquisitorial handbook that leans on scholastic angelology and the Summa’s demonology cluster. Aquinas did not write the Malleus. Reception is the path.
Context
Witch manuals are not the Summa. They are a later judicial use of scholastic permission to take spiritual harm as a crime. Confidence medium on unique causal share, high that the handbook names scholastic authority.
Thomas Aquinas is not the sole author of every later object, law, or museum label that uses the name. Shared work with courts, excavators, printers, spouses, officials, and later states does not erase a documented role, and it does not make an ancient person the signer of a twentieth-century statute.
Why it matters
A printed witch-handbook using Thomist headings is a judicial-harm reception, not an autograph.
Who was responsible
Contribution type and responsibility level for each recorded actor — not sole-author shorthand.
Thomas Aquinas
PersonDirect responsibility
responsibility level 0.2 · verified
Named Dominican master as heading of later editions and papal acts. Printers, popes, and editors publish the instrument.
What changed
Fact → Driver → Indicator. Relationship strength orders the paths; it is not the observed indicator movement.
- FactThe Malleus Maleficarum prints scholastic demonology that cites Thomist headings
- strengthensDriverJudicial independence erosion (court capture)
- strengthensIndicators (4)Rule of Law Gap from the Highest Governance Score
impact weight 0.4 · Effect from 1 January 1487 · verified
A printed witch-handbook using Thomist headings is a judicial-harm reception, not an autograph.
- Worse
Strengthens · Relationship strength 0.29 (weight 0.4 × strength 0.72)
Observed
43.9 Score · 43.9 above the normal line (2024)
Worse than normal26 readings, 1996–2024: rose from 43 Score to 43.9 Score.
Normal is zero · any amount = worse
Weakens · Relationship strength 0.28 (weight 0.4 × strength 0.7)
Observed
0.55 index score (0-1) · 0.26 below the normal line (2024)
Worse than normalAbove normal = better
Weakens · Relationship strength 0.28 (weight 0.4 × strength 0.69)
Observed
0.62 score from 0 to 1 · 0.25 below the normal line (2024)
Worse than normal125 readings, 1900–2024: rose from 0.37 score from 0 to 1 to 0.62 score from 0 to 1.
Above normal = better
All indicators on this path (4)
Weakens · Relationship strength 0.12 (weight 0.4 × strength 0.3)
Observed
42.5 index score (0-100) · 7.53 below the normal line (2025)
Worse than normalAbove normal = better
Evidence
The sources behind this fact and its verification state.
- 1.Malleus Maleficarum (public-domain English)Project Gutenberg · High credibility · verified
- 2.Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy — AquinasStanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy · High credibility · verified
What the sources establish
Later competitions, monuments, translations, UNESCO listings, and museums are not converted into extra lifetime acts. That reading is an impact-path choice, not a property stored on the Fact itself. Confidence is stated on the impact path. A later English edition is not a recovered autograph. If a number is not in the two records named above, it is not supplied here.
Causal path
How this event connects to drivers and indicators in the graph.
- ActorThomas Aquinas
- contributed toFactThe Malleus Maleficarum prints scholastic demonology that cites Thomist headings
- strengthensDriverJudicial independence erosion (court capture)
- strengthensIndicatorRule of Law Gap from the Highest Governance Score
Cite this page
Factrail. (2026). The Malleus Maleficarum prints scholastic demonology that cites Thomist headings. Factrail. https://factrail.ai/facts/aq-malleus-1487-reception
https://factrail.ai/facts/aq-malleus-1487-reception
Accessed 16 October 2026.
By the Factrail desk · Method: how we source and score · Last reviewed
Dispute this factNamed here, or represent someone who is? Request a right of reply.