Pius X’s Pascendi uses scholastic-Thomist orthodoxy against modernist historical method
On 8 September 1907 Pascendi dominici gregis condemned ‘modernism’, requiring oaths and scholastic method. In the causal graph this event strengthens Political Polarization, a driver that weakens Having a say in government — a worsening welfare path.
Read the full account
On 8 September 1907 Pascendi dominici gregis condemned ‘modernism’, requiring oaths and scholastic method. Aquinas is the heading of the required method, not the signer.
Context
Anti-modernist oaths polarised clergy and scholars. Thomism as a police method is a reception harm distinct from thirteenth-century disputed questions.
Thomas Aquinas is not the sole author of every later object, law, or museum label that uses the name. Shared work with courts, excavators, printers, spouses, officials, and later states does not erase a documented role, and it does not make an ancient person the signer of a twentieth-century statute.
Who was responsible
Contribution type and responsibility level for each recorded actor — not sole-author shorthand.
Thomas Aquinas
PersonDirect responsibility
responsibility level 0.2 · verified
Named Dominican master as heading of later editions and papal acts. Printers, popes, and editors publish the instrument.
What changed
Fact → Driver → Indicator. Relationship strength orders the paths; it is not the observed indicator movement.
- FactPius X’s Pascendi uses scholastic-Thomist orthodoxy against modernist historical method
- strengthensDriverPolitical Polarization
- weakensIndicators (2)Having a say in government
impact weight 0.4 · Effect from 8 September 1907 · verified
Weakens · Relationship strength 0.18 (weight 0.4 × strength 0.45)
Observed
29.8% of population aged 16-65 years · 8.13 below the normal line (2023)
Worse than normalTwo readings: 30.2% of population aged 16-65 years (2021) and 29.8% of population aged 16-65 years (2023).
20212023 Above normal = better
Strengthens · Relationship strength 0.18 (weight 0.4 × strength 0.45)
Observed
43.9 Score · 43.9 above the normal line (2024)
Worse than normal26 readings, 1996–2024: rose from 43 Score to 43.9 Score.
Normal is zero · any amount = worse
Evidence
The sources behind this fact and its verification state.
- 1.Catholic Encyclopedia — St. Thomas AquinasNew Advent · High credibility · verified
- 2.Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy — AquinasStanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy · High credibility · verified
What the sources establish
Later competitions, monuments, translations, UNESCO listings, and museums are not converted into extra lifetime acts. That reading is an impact-path choice, not a property stored on the Fact itself. Confidence is stated on the impact path. A later English edition is not a recovered autograph. If a number is not in the two records named above, it is not supplied here. Confidence is stated on the impact path.
Causal path
How this event connects to drivers and indicators in the graph.
- ActorThomas Aquinas
- contributed toFactPius X’s Pascendi uses scholastic-Thomist orthodoxy against modernist historical method
- strengthensDriverPolitical Polarization
- weakensIndicatorHaving a say in government
Cite this page
Factrail. (2026). Pius X’s Pascendi uses scholastic-Thomist orthodoxy against modernist historical method. Factrail. https://factrail.ai/facts/aq-pascendi-1907-lock
https://factrail.ai/facts/aq-pascendi-1907-lock
Accessed 16 October 2026.
By the Factrail desk · Method: how we source and score · Last reviewed
Dispute this factNamed here, or represent someone who is? Request a right of reply.