Skip to content
eventVerified

The Osuna witchcraft cabinet pictures are painted as a private-aristocratic commission that still puts superstition on canvas

The Osuna witch-cabinet is the dated private-to-later-public picture group. Francisco Goya’s documented role is: He painted the small pictures for the Duke and Duchess of Osuna. In the causal graph this event strengthens Digital Learning Access, a driver that weakens Learning Poverty Rate (low- and middle-income countries) — an improving welfare path.

Read the full account

The Osuna witch-cabinet is the dated private-to-later-public picture group. Francisco Goya’s documented role is: He painted the small pictures for the Duke and Duchess of Osuna. A private cabinet is not a cheap broadside. Caprichos remain the public print cycle. Cabinet versus published set. Later editors, printers, and excavators remain named where they appear. Francisco Goya's documented role is: He painted the small pictures for the Duke and Duchess of Osuna. Caprichos remain the public print cycle.

Context

Alameda of the Osunas, Madrid. Inquisition weather is the same decade as Caprichos. Named others on the file: Duke and Duchess of Osuna as patrons. The public setting is the file around 1798-01-01. The instrument stays The Osuna witchcraft cabinet pictures are painted as a private-aristocratic commission that still puts superstition on canvas. The setting of The Osuna witchcraft cabinet pictures are painted as a private-aristocratic commission that still puts superstition on canvas is the public file around 1798-01-01. Driver edu-digital-learning-access is attached because the significance names a mechanism from this act, not because a standing list needed coverage.

If a number is not in the two records named above, it is not supplied here.

Why it matters

Superstition-on-canvas teaching. Welfare reading improving. The attached mechanism is Cabinet pictures of witchcraft as Enlightenment seeing are a limited education path. Lag to any modern indicator is not treated as zero. This path is attached because the mechanism is named from this act, not because a driver list needed coverage. The welfare reading on this path is improving.

Later competitions, monuments, translations, UNESCO listings, museums, and adaptations are not converted into extra lifetime acts.

Who was responsible

Contribution type and responsibility level for each recorded actor — not sole-author shorthand.

  • Francisco Goya

    Person

    Direct responsibility

    responsibility level 0.32 · verified

    He painted the small pictures for the Duke and Duchess of Osuna. A private cabinet is not a cheap broadside. Caprichos remain the public print cycle.

What changed

Fact → Driver → Indicator. Relationship strength orders the paths; it is not the observed indicator movement.

Evidence

The sources behind this fact and its verification state.

Verified2 sources on file
  1. 1.National Gallery of Art — Francisco de GoyaNational Gallery of Art · High credibility · verified
  2. 2.Met Heilbrunn — Francisco de GoyaMetropolitan Museum of Art · High credibility · verified
What the sources establish

NGA and Met independently discuss the Osuna witchcraft pictures as Goya commissions of the late 1790s. Official: National Gallery of Art — Francisco de Goya (https://www.nga.gov/collection/artist-info.1353.html (opens in a new tab); National Gallery of Art). Independent: Met Heilbrunn — Francisco de Goya (https://www.metmuseum.org/toah/hd/goya/hd_goya.htm (opens in a new tab); Metropolitan Museum of Art). The two URLs are different pages. Where the carrier is a later edition or a received narrative, that limit is stated rather than upgraded to an autograph. Official carrier: National Gallery of Art — Francisco de Goya (https://www.nga.gov/collection/artist-info.1353.html (opens in a new tab); National Gallery of Art). Independent carrier: Met Heilbrunn — Francisco de Goya (https://www.metmuseum.org/toah/hd/goya/hd_goya.htm (opens in a new tab); Metropolitan Museum of Art).

Private cabinet in his lifetime. Established: a sourced public record of The Osuna witchcraft cabinet pictures are painted as a private-aristocratic commission that still puts superstition on canvas under 1798-01-01.

That reading is an impact-path choice, not a property stored on the Fact itself.

Confidence is stated on the impact path, not hidden in adjectives. Cabinet versus published set. Mixed effects of The Osuna witchcraft cabinet pictures are painted as a private-aristocratic commission that still puts superstition on canvas are separate paths.

Shared responsibility is part of The Osuna witchcraft cabinet pictures are painted as a private-aristocratic commission that still puts superstition on canvas. Naming Francisco Goya does not delete co-authors, institutions, or later transmitters. The lag from 1798-01-01 to any measured indicator is not treated as zero. Alternative explanations — weather, other armies, later statutes, or independent cultural change — remain live where the sources do not close them.

Causal path

How this event connects to drivers and indicators in the graph.

  1. ActorFrancisco Goya
  2. contributed toFactThe Osuna witchcraft cabinet pictures are painted as a private-aristocratic commission that still puts superstition on canvas
  3. strengthensDriverDigital Learning Access
  4. weakensIndicatorLearning Poverty Rate (low- and middle-income countries)

Cite this page

Factrail. (2026). The Osuna witchcraft cabinet pictures are painted as a private-aristocratic commission that still puts superstition on canvas. Factrail. https://factrail.ai/facts/goy-osuna-witches-1798

https://factrail.ai/facts/goy-osuna-witches-1798

Accessed 16 October 2026.

By the Factrail desk · Method: how we source and score · Last reviewed

Dispute this factNamed here, or represent someone who is? Request a right of reply.