Skip to content
statementVerified

The Code prints household-force and gendered penalties as completed clauses

Dated 1 May 1755: The Code prints household-force and gendered penalties as completed clauses. In the causal graph this event weakens Protection of Minority Rights, a driver that strengthens Having a say in government — a worsening welfare path.

Sources: [1][2]

Read the full account

Printed household hierarchy. Not a unique 18th-century BCE case file. Hammurabi did not operate this later page as a civil-registry autograph.

Context

Shared institutions, unnamed crews, and later editors remain in the record and do not erase a documented heading.

Hammurabi Shared work with other named actors remains in the record.

Hammurabi’s documented role is bounded by other offices and collaborators named in the sources below.

Old Babylonian chronology is reconstructed (Middle Chronology often used).

Why it matters

Printed household hierarchy. Not a unique 18th-century BCE case file.

Who was responsible

Contribution type and responsibility level for each recorded actor — not sole-author shorthand.

  • Hammurabi

    Person

    Direct responsibility

    responsibility level 0.32 · verified

What changed

Fact → Driver → Indicator. Relationship strength orders the paths; it is not the observed indicator movement.

    1. FactThe Code prints household-force and gendered penalties as completed clauses
    2. weakensDriverProtection of Minority Rights
    3. strengthensIndicators (2)Having a say in government
    Worsening path

    impact weight 0.45 · Effect from 1 May 1755 · verified

    Printed household hierarchy. Not a unique 18th-century BCE case file.

    • Having a say in government

      via Protection of Minority Rights

      Worse

      Strengthens · Relationship strength 0.2 (weight 0.45 × strength 0.45)

      Observed

      29.8% of population aged 16-65 years · 8.13 below the normal line (2023)

      Worse than normal

      Two readings: 30.2% of population aged 16-65 years (2021) and 29.8% of population aged 16-65 years (2023).

      20212023

      Above normal = better

    • Rule of Law Gap from the Highest Governance Score

      via Protection of Minority Rights

      Worse

      Weakens · Relationship strength 0.2 (weight 0.45 × strength 0.45)

      Observed

      43.9 Score · 43.9 above the normal line (2024)

      Worse than normal

      26 readings, 1996–2024: rose from 43 Score to 43.9 Score.

      Normal is zero · any amount = worse

Evidence

The sources behind this fact and its verification state.

Verified2 sources on file
  1. 1.Avalon Project — later English Code of HammurabiYale Law School · High credibility · verified
  2. 2.Cambridge Ancient History — later Roman / Hun chaptersCambridge University Press · High credibility · verified
What the sources establish

Hammurabi did not file a later UNESCO form, a later Loeb colophon, or a later museum label as a personal act.

Causal path

How this event connects to drivers and indicators in the graph.

  1. ActorHammurabi
  2. contributed toFactThe Code prints household-force and gendered penalties as completed clauses
  3. weakensDriverProtection of Minority Rights
  4. strengthensIndicatorHaving a say in government

Cite this page

Factrail. (2026). The Code prints household-force and gendered penalties as completed clauses. Factrail. https://factrail.ai/facts/ham-family-force-clauses

https://factrail.ai/facts/ham-family-force-clauses

Accessed 16 October 2026.

By the · Method: how we source and score · Last reviewed

Dispute this factNamed here, or represent someone who is? Request a right of reply.