Joan abjures under the Rouen process, then is held in a relapse trap
Dated 24 May 1431: Joan abjures under the Rouen process, then is held in a relapse trap. In the causal graph this event weakens Judicial independence erosion (court capture), a driver that strengthens Rule of Law Gap from the Highest Governance Score — an improving welfare path.
Read the full account
On 24 May 1431 Joan abjured at Rouen. Within days the court treated her as relapsed, a finding that opened the way to the 30 May burning. This Fact stores the abjuration-and-trap sequence, not the fire itself.
Context
Abjuration under a pyre threat is not a free theological seminar.
Joan of Arc is not the sole author of every later object, law, or museum label that uses the name. Shared work with courts, excavators, printers, spouses, officials, and later states does not erase a documented role, and it does not make an ancient person the signer of a twentieth-century statute.
Why it matters
Procedural-injustice path. High confidence on the abjuration date.
A signature under threat is not a conversion.
Who was responsible
Contribution type and responsibility level for each recorded actor — not sole-author shorthand.
Joan of Arc
PersonDirect responsibility
responsibility level 0.3 · verified
Complex: she signed or made an abjuration under threat. The court designed the cemetery theatre and the relapse path.
What changed
Fact → Driver → Indicator. Relationship strength orders the paths; it is not the observed indicator movement.
- FactJoan abjures under the Rouen process, then is held in a relapse trap
- weakensDriverJudicial independence erosion (court capture)
- strengthensIndicators (4)Rule of Law Gap from the Highest Governance Score
impact weight 0.55 · Effect from 24 May 1431 · verified
A coerced public abjuration followed by a stacked relapse is a documented destruction of independent judgment in a capital court.
- Better
Strengthens · Relationship strength 0.4 (weight 0.55 × strength 0.72)
Observed
43.9 Score · 43.9 above the normal line (2024)
Worse than normal26 readings, 1996–2024: rose from 43 Score to 43.9 Score.
Normal is zero · any amount = worse
Weakens · Relationship strength 0.39 (weight 0.55 × strength 0.7)
Observed
0.55 index score (0-1) · 0.26 below the normal line (2024)
Worse than normalAbove normal = better
Weakens · Relationship strength 0.38 (weight 0.55 × strength 0.69)
Observed
0.62 score from 0 to 1 · 0.25 below the normal line (2024)
Worse than normal125 readings, 1900–2024: rose from 0.37 score from 0 to 1 to 0.62 score from 0 to 1.
Above normal = better
All indicators on this path (4)
- Better
Weakens · Relationship strength 0.17 (weight 0.55 × strength 0.3)
Observed
42.5 index score (0-100) · 7.53 below the normal line (2025)
Worse than normalAbove normal = better
Evidence
The sources behind this fact and its verification state.
- 1.Historial Jeanne d’Arc — RouenHistorial Jeanne d’Arc / Rouen · High credibility · verified
- 2.Britannica — Saint Joan of ArcEncyclopaedia Britannica · High credibility · verified
What the sources establish
Historial officiality narrative and Britannica independently date 24 May 1431.
Established: 24 May 1431 abjuration and subsequent relapse finding. Not established: a modern psychiatric file, or that she authored the cemetery script.
Causal path
How this event connects to drivers and indicators in the graph.
- ActorJoan of Arc
- contributed toFactJoan abjures under the Rouen process, then is held in a relapse trap
- weakensDriverJudicial independence erosion (court capture)
- strengthensIndicatorRule of Law Gap from the Highest Governance Score
Cite this page
Factrail. (2026). Joan abjures under the Rouen process, then is held in a relapse trap. Factrail. https://factrail.ai/facts/joa-abjuration-1431
https://factrail.ai/facts/joa-abjuration-1431
Accessed 16 October 2026.
By the Factrail desk · Method: how we source and score · Last reviewed
Dispute this factNamed here, or represent someone who is? Request a right of reply.