Jules Quicherat’s edition of the condemnation and rehabilitation trials enters public scholarship
From 1841 Jules Quicherat’s Procès de condamnation et de réhabilitation de Jeanne d’Arc put the trial texts into a standard printed scholarly series. This catalog uses that later public carrier because a 1431 file cabinet is not the object here. In the causal graph this event strengthens Digital Learning Access, a driver that weakens Learning Poverty Rate (low- and middle-income countries) — an improving welfare path.
Read the full account
From 1841 Jules Quicherat’s Procès de condamnation et de réhabilitation de Jeanne d’Arc put the trial texts into a standard printed scholarly series. This catalog uses that later public carrier because a 1431 file cabinet is not the object here.
Context
National historiography wanted a usable Maid. An edition can serve nationalism and can still be a knowledge instrument. The nationalist statue is a different worsening row.
Joan of Arc is not the sole author of every later object, law, or museum label that uses the name. Shared work with courts, excavators, printers, spouses, officials, and later states does not erase a documented role, and it does not make an ancient person the signer of a twentieth-century statute.
Why it matters
Knowledge-access path. High confidence on the edition’s existence.
An edition is not a burning. Keep 1431 on its own path.
Who was responsible
Contribution type and responsibility level for each recorded actor — not sole-author shorthand.
Joan of Arc
PersonDirect responsibility
responsibility level 0.15 · verified
The trial identity is hers. The 1841–49 printed edition is Quicherat’s and the historical society’s.
What changed
Fact → Driver → Indicator. Relationship strength orders the paths; it is not the observed indicator movement.
- FactJules Quicherat’s edition of the condemnation and rehabilitation trials enters public scholarship
- strengthensDriverDigital Learning Access
- weakensIndicators (3)Learning Poverty Rate (low- and middle-income countries)
impact weight 0.55 · Effect from 1 January 1841 · verified
A public scholarly edition made the Rouen and rehabilitation minutes copyable without a unique manuscript privilege.
Weakens · Relationship strength 0.22 (weight 0.55 × strength 0.4)
Observed
70% of 10-year-olds · 70 above the normal line (2022)
Worse than normalTwo readings: 57% of 10-year-olds (2019) and 70% of 10-year-olds (2022).
20192022 Above normal = worse
Strengthens · Relationship strength 0.19 (weight 0.55 × strength 0.35)
Observed
472 PISA score points · 28 below the normal line (2022)
Worse than normal7 readings, 2003–2022: fell from 499 PISA score points to 472 PISA score points.
Above normal = better
Weakens · Relationship strength 0.17 (weight 0.55 × strength 0.3)
Observed
11% of primary-school-age children · 11 above the normal line (2023)
Worse than normalAbove normal = worse
Evidence
The sources behind this fact and its verification state.
- 1.Internet Archive — historical editions of the Joan of Arc trialsInternet Archive · High credibility · verified
- 2.Gallica — Bibliothèque nationale de FranceBibliothèque nationale de France · High credibility · verified
What the sources establish
Gallica and Internet Archive independently hold the nineteenth-century trial editions.
Established: Quicherat’s trial edition from 1841. Not established: that print instantly created a literacy series, or that the edition is a 1431 autograph.
Causal path
How this event connects to drivers and indicators in the graph.
- ActorJoan of Arc
- contributed toFactJules Quicherat’s edition of the condemnation and rehabilitation trials enters public scholarship
- strengthensDriverDigital Learning Access
- weakensIndicatorLearning Poverty Rate (low- and middle-income countries)
Cite this page
Factrail. (2026). Jules Quicherat’s edition of the condemnation and rehabilitation trials enters public scholarship. Factrail. https://factrail.ai/facts/joa-quicherat-1841
https://factrail.ai/facts/joa-quicherat-1841
Accessed 16 October 2026.
By the Factrail desk · Method: how we source and score · Last reviewed
Dispute this factNamed here, or represent someone who is? Request a right of reply.