
On 7 May 2021 the European Court of Human Rights, in Xero Flor w Polsce sp. z o.o. v. Poland (application no. 4907/18), held that the participation of an unlawfully elected 'judge-doubler' in the Polish Constitutional Tribunal meant the body was not a 'tribunal established by law', violating Article 6(1) of the European Convention on Human Rights. It was the first international court ruling that the Tribunal's composition was unlawful.
On 7 May 2021 the European Court of Human Rights, in Xero Flor w Polsce sp. z o.o. v. Poland (application no. 4907/18), held that the participation of an unlawfully elected 'judge-doubler' in the Polish Constitutional Tribunal meant the body was not a 'tribunal established by law', violating Article 6(1) of the European Convention on Human Rights. It was the first international court ruling that the Tribunal's composition was unlawful.
This fact’s slice of Factrail’s verified causal web — the people, facts, drivers and welfare indicators it connects to. Select any node to trace a path.
Loading network…
The ECtHR judgment added Council-of-Europe legal accountability to EU pressure, reinforcing the driver.
Authoritatively documenting the captured Constitutional Tribunal undercut the legitimacy of the erosion process.