Observations on the Feeling of the Beautiful and Sublime (1764) prints national and gendered character rankings as a public text
In 1764 Kant published Observations on the Feeling of the Beautiful and Sublime, printing national and gendered character rankings. Immanuel Kant's documented role is: He published national-character and gender rankings in a popular aesthetics book. In the causal graph this event strengthens Political Polarization, a driver that weakens Having a say in government — a worsening welfare path.
Read the full account
In 1764 Kant published Observations on the Feeling of the Beautiful and Sublime, printing national and gendered character rankings. The instrument is that book. Immanuel Kant's documented role is: He published national-character and gender rankings in a popular aesthetics book. Later reprints carry them.
Context
The 1790 third Critique is a different aesthetic treatise. Sharing unnamed Königsberg readers is required. The setting of Observations on the Feeling of the Beautiful and Sublime (1764) prints national and gendered character rankings as a public text is the public file around 1764-01-01. Driver political-polarization is attached because the significance names a mechanism from this act, not because a standing list needed coverage.
Why it matters
Worsening path from Observations on the Feeling of the Beautiful and Sublime (1764) prints national and gendered character rankings as a public text on 1764-01-01. Printed character-rankings are a polarisation path of high confidence on the text. The welfare reading on this path is worsening.
If a number is not in the two records named above, it is not supplied here.
Who was responsible
Contribution type and responsibility level for each recorded actor — not sole-author shorthand.
Immanuel Kant
PersonDirect responsibility
responsibility level 0.36 · verified
He published national-character and gender rankings in a popular aesthetics book. Later reprints carry them.
What changed
Fact → Driver → Indicator. Relationship strength orders the paths; it is not the observed indicator movement.
- FactObservations on the Feeling of the Beautiful and Sublime (1764) prints national and gendered character rankings as a public text
- strengthensDriverPolitical Polarization
- weakensIndicators (2)Having a say in government
impact weight 0.35 · Effect from 1 January 1764 · verified
Printed character-rankings are a polarisation path of high confidence on the text.
Weakens · Relationship strength 0.16 (weight 0.35 × strength 0.45)
Observed
29.8% of population aged 16-65 years · 8.13 below the normal line (2023)
Worse than normalTwo readings: 30.2% of population aged 16-65 years (2021) and 29.8% of population aged 16-65 years (2023).
20212023 Above normal = better
Strengthens · Relationship strength 0.16 (weight 0.35 × strength 0.45)
Observed
43.9 Score · 43.9 above the normal line (2024)
Worse than normal26 readings, 1996–2024: rose from 43 Score to 43.9 Score.
Normal is zero · any amount = worse
Evidence
The sources behind this fact and its verification state.
- 1.Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy — Kant's aesthetics neighbourhoodStanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy · High credibility · verified
- 2.Britannica — Immanuel Kant, writings neighbourhoodEncyclopaedia Britannica · High credibility · verified
What the sources establish
Official locator: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy — Kant's aesthetics neighbourhood at https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/kant-aesthetics/ (opens in a new tab) (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy). Independent locator: Britannica — Immanuel Kant, pre-critical writings neighbourhood at https://www.britannica.com/biography/Immanuel-Kant (opens in a new tab) (Encyclopaedia Britannica). Official carrier: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy — Kant's aesthetics neighbourhood (https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/kant-aesthetics/ (opens in a new tab); Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy). Independent carrier: Britannica — Immanuel Kant, pre-critical writings neighbourhood (https://www.britannica.com/biography/Immanuel-Kant (opens in a new tab); Encyclopaedia Britannica).
Established: a sourced public record of Observations on the Feeling of the Beautiful and Sublime (1764) prints national and gendered character rankings as a public text under 1764-01-01 for Immanuel Kant. Established: a sourced public record of Observations on the Feeling of the Beautiful and Sublime (1764) prints national and gendered character rankings as a public text under 1764-01-01.
Confidence is stated on the impact path, not hidden in adjectives. Two aesthetic instruments, twenty-six years apart. Mixed effects of Observations on the Feeling of the Beautiful and Sublime (1764) prints national and gendered character rankings as a public text are separate paths.
Later competitions, monuments, translations, UNESCO listings, museums, and adaptations are not converted into extra lifetime acts.
That reading is an impact-path choice, not a property stored on the Fact itself.
Shared responsibility is part of Observations on the Feeling of the Beautiful and Sublime (1764) prints national and gendered character rankings as a public text. Naming Immanuel Kant does not delete co-authors, institutions, or later transmitters. The lag from 1764-01-01 to any measured indicator is not treated as zero. Alternative explanations — weather, other armies, later statutes, or independent cultural change — remain live where the sources do not close them.
Causal path
How this event connects to drivers and indicators in the graph.
- ActorImmanuel Kant
- contributed toFactObservations on the Feeling of the Beautiful and Sublime (1764) prints national and gendered character rankings as a public text
- strengthensDriverPolitical Polarization
- weakensIndicatorHaving a say in government
Cite this page
Factrail. (2026). Observations on the Feeling of the Beautiful and Sublime (1764) prints national and gendered character rankings as a public text. Factrail. https://factrail.ai/facts/kan-observations-1764
https://factrail.ai/facts/kan-observations-1764
Accessed 16 October 2026.
By the Factrail desk · Method: how we source and score · Last reviewed
Dispute this factNamed here, or represent someone who is? Request a right of reply.