Skip to content
Immanuel Kant

Immanuel Kant

0

Near balanceFormula-derived score

Königsberg philosopher (1724–1804). Country stored as Prussia. Documented harms: race essays, 1764 rankings, Wöllner religion ban, royal chair patronage.

Königsberg chair as Prussian public teachingrace essays as documented hierarchical costs1793 religion censorship as a speech constraint not a 2024 conference

Impact

Not rated yet: the verified records linked to this person, without a numeric impact.

Editorial assessment (context, not the score)

The record is not a marble liberal of a 2024 congress and not a unique author of a UN charter. The heaviest documented costs are the race essays, 1764 and 1798 ranking textbooks, a royal chair, and the 1794 religion ban. The offsets are the three Critiques, the Groundwork, and Perpetual Peace as a pamphlet. Confidence is high on those imprints and on the cabinet order as dated, medium on unique servant-wage coefficients. Confidence is stated on dated offices, books, and campaigns, not on later statues.

Indicators affected

Indicators this person’s verified facts reach. No score contribution is assigned; the observed state is the indicator’s own reading.

Accountability & contradictions

Claims against the record, the type of responsibility, and what is disputed.

Causal path

Person → Fact → Driver → Indicator. Select a path to inspect its factors; the full network opens on demand.

Timeline

The most relevant dated facts, newest first.

Evidence & methodology

How the record is sourced and how the score is derived.

32 of 32 linked facts verified, drawing on 7 distinct sources (1755–1798).

Sources include Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Encyclopaedia Britannica, Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

The score is formula-derived (Factrail formula v1, version 1.0.0), not an editorial verdict. Read the methodology.

By the Factrail desk · Method: how we source and score · Last reviewed · Sources: 7

Expert analysis

An excerpt; the full analysis opens on request.

The offices he actually held

Kant is a Prussian ordinary professor who wrote a stack of Critiques and also a stack of race essays. Britannica at https://www.britannica.com/biography/Immanuel-Kant (opens in a new tab), SEP at https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/kant/ (opens in a new tab), moral philosophy at https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/kant-moral/ (opens in a new tab), religion at https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/kant-religion/ (opens in a new tab), IEP at https://iep.utm.edu/kantview/ (opens in a new tab), and Gutenberg later English at https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/author/1426 (opens in a new tab) and https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/4280 (opens in a new tab) are independent public files.

The first fact about his power is a Königsberg chair. The second is print. The third is a 1794 speech-ban.

What went wrong

Race essays of 1775, 1785, and 1788 are documented hierarchical texts, not later smears. Observations 1764 ranks nations and sexes. Anthropology 1798 continues lecture rankings. Wöllner's cabinet order after Religion is a royal ban. Capital punishment in the 1797 doctrine of right is a justice cost. Perpetual Peace does not itself disarm Prussia.

What improved

Critique of Pure Reason 1781/1787, Groundwork, second and third Critiques, Prolegomena, Enlightenment essay, Perpetual Peace as pamphlet, Religion as book, doctrine of right as law-treatise, the teaching chair, 1755 cosmology.

Related people: Hume as received awakener, Rousseau, Newton, Leibniz as predecessor, Herz, Frederick II, Frederick William II / Wöllner as censors, Hegel as later Berlin reader, Fichte as later successor-neighbour, Mendelssohn as Enlightenment counterpart.

Country stays Prussia. A 2024 conference is not 1781. Later Loeb, UNESCO, and encyclopedia pages are evidence, not additional acts. Related 2024–2025 news about COP, NATO, or a chancellorship is not a relation. Shared work remains named. What would change the reading is a contradictory original with a different date or signatory. Shared work remains named. Shared work remains named. Shared work remains named. Shared work remains named. Shared work remains named.

The critical philosophy was built in a tightly dated series from 1781 to 1790

Kant spent almost his entire life in Königsberg, where he became professor of logic and metaphysics in 1770, but his most influential publications arrived relatively late. The first edition of the Critique of Pure Reason appeared in 1781 and a substantially revised second edition in 1787; the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (opens in a new tab) explains how the project asked what makes objective experience and knowledge possible while limiting claims that theoretical reason can establish about things beyond possible experience. The 1780s then produced a concentrated sequence: “What Is Enlightenment?” in 1784, the Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals in 1785, the Critique of Practical Reason in 1788 and the Critique of Judgment in 1790. This chronology matters because Kant’s accounts of knowledge, morality and aesthetics were not isolated systems published at once. They were successive attempts to define the legitimate scope of reason and to explain how universal obligation, judgment and freedom could be defended without treating speculative metaphysics as established knowledge.

The 1790s religion controversy exposed a direct limit on Enlightenment-era academic freedom

Kant’s arguments about public reason eventually collided with Prussian censorship. Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason appeared in 1793 after difficulties with the censors, and in 1794 King Frederick William II’s government ordered Kant not to lecture or publish on religion in a way authorities regarded as distorting Christianity. The Stanford Encyclopedia’s account of Kant’s philosophy of religion (opens in a new tab) places the dispute within his attempt to distinguish moral religion from claims resting only on ecclesiastical authority. Kant complied with the royal order while the king lived, but after Frederick William II died in 1797 he returned publicly to questions of censorship and academic jurisdiction in The Conflict of the Faculties in 1798. The episode gives a concrete political setting to his famous 1784 defence of enlightenment as emergence from self-incurred immaturity. His philosophy praised the public use of reason, yet his own university career operated under a monarchy that could police religious teaching. Kant died in Königsberg on 12 February 1804.

Dispute a fact on this pageNamed here, or represent someone who is? Request a right of reply.