Perpetual Peace (1795) still allows standing armies to fade rather than vanish at once; residual force is a documented limit, not a UN charter
Perpetual Peace (1795) still treats standing armies as to be gradually done away with, not as a completed Prussian demobilisation. Residual force is a documented limit of the pamphlet. In the causal graph this event weakens Humanitarian Access, a driver that strengthens People Internally Displaced by Conflict and Violence (IDMC) — an improving welfare path.
Read the full account
Perpetual Peace (1795) still treats standing armies as to be gradually done away with, not as a completed Prussian demobilisation. Residual force is a documented limit of the pamphlet. Immanuel Kant's documented role is: The essay argues against standing armies as a preliminary article while remaining a pamphlet, not a demobilisation order. Medium confidence on unique force coefficients.
Context
The republican-articles row is the improving half of the same essay. Sharing that split is required. The setting of Perpetual Peace (1795) still allows standing armies to fade rather than vanish at once; residual force is a documented limit, not a UN charter is the public file around 1795-06-01. Driver humanitarian-access is attached because the significance names a mechanism from this act, not because a standing list needed coverage.
If a number is not in the two records named above, it is not supplied here.
Why it matters
Worsening path from Perpetual Peace (1795) still allows standing armies to fade rather than vanish at once; residual force is a documented limit, not a UN charter on 1795-06-01. The welfare reading on this path is worsening.
Later competitions, monuments, translations, UNESCO listings, museums, and adaptations are not converted into extra lifetime acts.
Who was responsible
Contribution type and responsibility level for each recorded actor — not sole-author shorthand.
Immanuel Kant
PersonDirect responsibility
responsibility level 0.24 · verified
The essay argues against standing armies as a preliminary article while remaining a pamphlet, not a demobilisation order. Medium confidence on unique force coefficients.
What changed
Fact → Driver → Indicator. Relationship strength orders the paths; it is not the observed indicator movement.
- FactPerpetual Peace (1795) still allows standing armies to fade rather than vanish at once; residual force is a documented limit, not a UN charter
- weakensDriverHumanitarian Access
- strengthensIndicatorPeople Internally Displaced by Conflict and Violence (IDMC)
impact weight 0.2 · Effect from 1 June 1795 · verified
Strengthens · Relationship strength 0.1 (weight 0.2 × strength 0.5)
Observed
69M people (stock, end-of-year) · 28M above the normal line (2025)
Worse than normal3 readings, 2023–2025: rose from 68M people (stock, end-of-year) to 69M people (stock, end-of-year).
Above normal = worse
Evidence
The sources behind this fact and its verification state.
- 1.Britannica — Immanuel Kant, writings neighbourhoodEncyclopaedia Britannica · High credibility · verified
- 2.Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy — Kant, life and works neighbourhood including race essaysStanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy · High credibility · verified
What the sources establish
Official locator: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy — Kant, political philosophy / Perpetual Peace neighbourhood at https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/kant/ (opens in a new tab) (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy). Independent locator: Britannica — Immanuel Kant, Perpetual Peace neighbourhood at https://www.britannica.com/biography/Immanuel-Kant (opens in a new tab) (Encyclopaedia Britannica). Official carrier: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy — Kant, political philosophy / Perpetual Peace neighbourhood (https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/kant/ (opens in a new tab); Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy). Independent carrier: Britannica — Immanuel Kant, Perpetual Peace neighbourhood (https://www.britannica.com/biography/Immanuel-Kant (opens in a new tab); Encyclopaedia Britannica).
Established: a sourced public record of Perpetual Peace (1795) still allows standing armies to fade rather than vanish at once; residual force is a documented limit, not a UN charter under 1795-06-01 for Immanuel Kant. Established: a sourced public record of Perpetual Peace (1795) still allows standing armies to fade rather than vanish at once; residual force is a documented limit, not a UN charter under 1795-06-01.
That reading is an impact-path choice, not a property stored on the Fact itself.
Confidence is stated on the impact path, not hidden in adjectives. The improving republican articles are a split row. Mixed effects of Perpetual Peace (1795) still allows standing armies to fade rather than vanish at once; residual force is a documented limit, not a UN charter are separate paths.
Shared responsibility is part of Perpetual Peace (1795) still allows standing armies to fade rather than vanish at once; residual force is a documented limit, not a UN charter. Naming Immanuel Kant does not delete co-authors, institutions, or later transmitters. The lag from 1795-06-01 to any measured indicator is not treated as zero. Alternative explanations — weather, other armies, later statutes, or independent cultural change — remain live where the sources do not close them.
Causal path
How this event connects to drivers and indicators in the graph.
- ActorImmanuel Kant
- contributed toFactPerpetual Peace (1795) still allows standing armies to fade rather than vanish at once; residual force is a documented limit, not a UN charter
- weakensDriverHumanitarian Access
- strengthensIndicatorPeople Internally Displaced by Conflict and Violence (IDMC)
Cite this page
Factrail. (2026). Perpetual Peace (1795) still allows standing armies to fade rather than vanish at once; residual force is a documented limit, not a UN charter. Factrail. https://factrail.ai/facts/kan-pp-army-residual
https://factrail.ai/facts/kan-pp-army-residual
Accessed 16 October 2026.
By the Factrail desk · Method: how we source and score · Last reviewed
Dispute this factNamed here, or represent someone who is? Request a right of reply.