Skip to content
statementVerified

Genera Plantarum and Critica Botanica issue Linnaeus’s naming rules and genera

In 1737 Carl Linnaeus issued Genera Plantarum and Critica Botanica, setting diagnoses of genera and rules for names that European botanists could share. Species Plantarum’s consistent binomials of 1753 are a later Fact. In the causal graph this event strengthens Social Cohesion, a driver that strengthens Having a say in government — an improving welfare path.

Read the full account

In 1737 Carl Linnaeus issued Genera Plantarum and Critica Botanica, setting diagnoses of genera and rules for names that European botanists could share. Species Plantarum’s consistent binomials of 1753 are a later Fact. The cohesion claim is a common language, not a claim that every local name died. John Ray’s earlier genera are not erased.

Context

Polynomials were getting longer as New World plants arrived. Linnaeus offered brevity and rules against commemorative chaos, while still commemorating patrons. Printers and Clifford’s purse shared the object. Sharing does not erase the author. Later ICN articles are other people’s statutes, not this 1737 pair.

Shared responsibility is part of Genera Plantarum and Critica Botanica issue Linnaeus’s naming rules and genera. Naming Carl Linnaeus does not delete co-authors, institutions, or later transmitters. The lag from 1737-01-01 to any measured indicator is not treated as zero. Alternative explanations — weather, other armies, later statutes, or independent cultural change — remain live where the sources do not close them.

Why it matters

Social-cohesion path among botanists. Modest-to-mid weight. High confidence on 1737 publication.

Who was responsible

Contribution type and responsibility level for each recorded actor — not sole-author shorthand.

  • Carl Linnaeus

    Person

    Direct responsibility

    responsibility level 0.36 · verified

    He wrote the naming rules and generic diagnoses. Dutch printers issued them beside Clifford work.

What changed

Fact → Driver → Indicator. Relationship strength orders the paths; it is not the observed indicator movement.

    1. FactGenera Plantarum and Critica Botanica issue Linnaeus’s naming rules and genera
    2. strengthensDriverSocial Cohesion
    3. strengthensIndicators (2)Having a say in government
    Improving path

    impact weight 0.4 · Effect from 1 January 1737 · verified

    Shared Latin naming rules let distant botanists talk about the same plants, a cohesion path, not a later legal code.

    • Having a say in government

      via Social Cohesion

      Better

      Strengthens · Relationship strength 0.18 (weight 0.4 × strength 0.45)

      Observed

      29.8% of population aged 16-65 years · 8.13 below the normal line (2023)

      Worse than normal

      Two readings: 30.2% of population aged 16-65 years (2021) and 29.8% of population aged 16-65 years (2023).

      20212023

      Above normal = better

    • Rule of Law Gap from the Highest Governance Score

      via Social Cohesion

      Better

      Weakens · Relationship strength 0.18 (weight 0.4 × strength 0.45)

      Observed

      43.9 Score · 43.9 above the normal line (2024)

      Worse than normal

      26 readings, 1996–2024: rose from 43 Score to 43.9 Score.

      Normal is zero · any amount = worse

Evidence

The sources behind this fact and its verification state.

Verified2 sources on file
  1. 1.Species Plantarum (1753) — Biodiversity Heritage LibraryBiodiversity Heritage Library · High credibility · verified
  2. 2.Britannica — Carolus LinnaeusEncyclopaedia Britannica · High credibility · verified
What the sources establish

Biodiversity Heritage Library’s Species Plantarum scan at https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/13829 (opens in a new tab) is the later public carrier of the naming project those 1737 books prepared. Britannica at https://www.britannica.com/biography/Carolus-Linnaeus (opens in a new tab) independently lists Genera Plantarum and Critica Botanica among the Dutch-year books. The URLs differ.

Established: Genera Plantarum and Critica Botanica appeared in 1737. Not established: that they are the legal starting point of later codes, which they are not. Contribution is recorded as He wrote the naming rules and generic diagnoses. Dutch printers issued them beside Clifford work. The impact note is Shared Latin naming rules let distant botanists talk about the same plants, a cohesion path, not a later legal code. The dated heading stays Genera Plantarum and Critica Botanica issue Linnaeus’s naming rules and genera on 1737-01-01, not a later statue, UNESCO listing, or school film. Later competitions, monuments, and adaptations are refused as extra lifetime acts of this person on this date.

Later competitions, monuments, translations, UNESCO listings, museums, and adaptations are not converted into extra lifetime acts.

If a number is not in the two records named above, it is not supplied here.

Confidence is stated on the impact path, not hidden in adjectives. 1737 rules are not the 1753 species list and not ICN. Mixed effects of Genera Plantarum and Critica Botanica issue Linnaeus’s naming rules and genera are separate paths.

The contribution type is direct. That reading is an impact-path choice, not a property stored on the Fact itself.

Causal path

How this event connects to drivers and indicators in the graph.

  1. ActorCarl Linnaeus
  2. contributed toFactGenera Plantarum and Critica Botanica issue Linnaeus’s naming rules and genera
  3. strengthensDriverSocial Cohesion
  4. strengthensIndicatorHaving a say in government

Cite this page

Factrail. (2026). Genera Plantarum and Critica Botanica issue Linnaeus’s naming rules and genera. Factrail. https://factrail.ai/facts/linnaeus-genera-1737

https://factrail.ai/facts/linnaeus-genera-1737

Accessed 16 October 2026.

By the Factrail desk · Method: how we source and score · Last reviewed

Dispute this factNamed here, or represent someone who is? Request a right of reply.