Skip to content
eventVerified

Printed Dio records the 175 CE revolt of Avidius Cassius and its suppression

Loeb/LacusCurtius Dio transmits Avidius Cassius’s usurpation in the East, conventionally 175 CE, and the aftermath in Marcus’s name. The dated carrier is the modern English Dio, not a 175-01-01 ISO file. In the causal graph this event strengthens Political Polarization, a driver that weakens Having a say in government — a worsening welfare path.

Sources: [1][2]

Read the full account

Loeb/LacusCurtius Dio transmits Avidius Cassius’s usurpation in the East, conventionally 175 CE, and the aftermath in Marcus’s name. The dated carrier is the modern English Dio, not a 175-01-01 ISO file.

Context

A civil-military split in a plague-and-war empire is a polarisation path. Later stories of Faustina’s role stay disputed and are not upgraded to autograph.

Marcus Aurelius is not the sole author of every later object, law, or museum label that uses the name. Shared work with courts, excavators, printers, spouses, officials, and later states does not erase a documented role, and it does not make an ancient person the signer of a twentieth-century statute.

Why it matters

A revolt in Dio is not a party system. It is still a succession shock.

A revolt in Dio is not a party system. It is still a succession shock.

Who was responsible

Contribution type and responsibility level for each recorded actor — not sole-author shorthand.

  • Direct responsibility

    responsibility level 0.32 · verified

    Dated act under Marcus as emperor or as later printed subject. Scribes, heirs, editors, and museums share labour.

What changed

Fact → Driver → Indicator. Relationship strength orders the paths; it is not the observed indicator movement.

    1. FactPrinted Dio records the 175 CE revolt of Avidius Cassius and its suppression
    2. strengthensDriverPolitical Polarization
    3. weakensIndicators (2)Having a say in government
    Worsening path

    impact weight 0.4 · Effect from 1 June 1927 · verified

    A revolt in Dio is not a party system. It is still a succession shock.

    • Weakens · Relationship strength 0.18 (weight 0.4 × strength 0.45)

      Observed

      29.8% of population aged 16-65 years · 8.13 below the normal line (2023)

      Worse than normal

      Two readings: 30.2% of population aged 16-65 years (2021) and 29.8% of population aged 16-65 years (2023).

      20212023

      Above normal = better

    • Strengthens · Relationship strength 0.18 (weight 0.4 × strength 0.45)

      Observed

      43.9 Score · 43.9 above the normal line (2024)

      Worse than normal

      26 readings, 1996–2024: rose from 43 Score to 43.9 Score.

      Normal is zero · any amount = worse

Evidence

The sources behind this fact and its verification state.

Verified2 sources on file
  1. 1.Cambridge Companion to Marcus AureliusCambridge University Press · High credibility · verified
  2. 2.LacusCurtius — Cassius DioUniversity of Chicago / LacusCurtius · High credibility · verified
What the sources establish

Later competitions, monuments, translations, UNESCO listings, and museums are not converted into extra lifetime acts. That reading is an impact-path choice, not a property stored on the Fact itself. Confidence is stated on the impact path. A later English edition is not a recovered autograph. If a number is not in the two records named above, it is not supplied here.

Causal path

How this event connects to drivers and indicators in the graph.

  1. ActorMarcus Aurelius
  2. contributed toFactPrinted Dio records the 175 CE revolt of Avidius Cassius and its suppression
  3. strengthensDriverPolitical Polarization
  4. weakensIndicatorHaving a say in government

Cite this page

Factrail. (2026). Printed Dio records the 175 CE revolt of Avidius Cassius and its suppression. Factrail. https://factrail.ai/facts/ma-avidius-cassius-dio

https://factrail.ai/facts/ma-avidius-cassius-dio

Accessed 16 October 2026.

By the Factrail desk · Method: how we source and score · Last reviewed

Dispute this factNamed here, or represent someone who is? Request a right of reply.