She is transferred to the Conciergerie on 1 August 1793 as a completed pre-trial detention
Conciergerie public pages and Britannica print 1 August 1793 as the transfer from the Temple to the Conciergerie. Later museum itineraries are carriers, not 1793. In the causal graph this event strengthens Judicial independence erosion (court capture), a driver that strengthens Rule of Law Gap from the Highest Governance Score — a worsening welfare path.
Read the full account
Conciergerie public pages and Britannica print 1 August 1793 as the transfer from the Temple to the Conciergerie. Later museum itineraries are carriers, not 1793.
Context
This is not the trial and not the execution. Officers of the Commune share custody.
Marie-Antoinette’s documented role is bounded by other offices and collaborators named in the sources below.
Lived 1755–1793; queen consort from 1774. Cake is a later slogan, not a sourced utterance. The Diamond Necklace is allegation and image. Fiscal crisis is not stored as her unique coefficient. Complex contribution is required.
Why it matters
A completed transfer into the tribunal’s prison is a justice path. It is not a tourist ticket.
Who was responsible
Contribution type and responsibility level for each recorded actor — not sole-author shorthand.
Marie-Antoinette
PersonDirect responsibility
responsibility level 0.4 · verified
What changed
Fact → Driver → Indicator. Relationship strength orders the paths; it is not the observed indicator movement.
- FactShe is transferred to the Conciergerie on 1 August 1793 as a completed pre-trial detention
- strengthensDriverJudicial independence erosion (court capture)
- strengthensIndicators (4)Rule of Law Gap from the Highest Governance Score
impact weight 0.5 · Effect from 1 August 1793 · verified
A completed transfer into the tribunal’s prison is a justice path. It is not a tourist ticket.
- Worse
Strengthens · Relationship strength 0.36 (weight 0.5 × strength 0.72)
Observed
43.9 Score · 43.9 above the normal line (2024)
Worse than normal26 readings, 1996–2024: rose from 43 Score to 43.9 Score.
Normal is zero · any amount = worse
Weakens · Relationship strength 0.35 (weight 0.5 × strength 0.7)
Observed
0.55 index score (0-1) · 0.26 below the normal line (2024)
Worse than normalAbove normal = better
Weakens · Relationship strength 0.34 (weight 0.5 × strength 0.69)
Observed
0.62 score from 0 to 1 · 0.25 below the normal line (2024)
Worse than normal125 readings, 1900–2024: rose from 0.37 score from 0 to 1 to 0.62 score from 0 to 1.
Above normal = better
All indicators on this path (4)
Weakens · Relationship strength 0.15 (weight 0.5 × strength 0.3)
Observed
42.5 index score (0-100) · 7.53 below the normal line (2025)
Worse than normalAbove normal = better
Evidence
The sources behind this fact and its verification state.
- 1.Centre des monuments nationaux — ConciergerieCentre des monuments nationaux · High credibility · verified
- 2.Britannica — Marie-AntoinetteEncyclopaedia Britannica · High credibility · verified
What the sources establish
CMN Conciergerie and Britannica independently describe the August 1793 transfer.
Established: 1 August 1793 Conciergerie detention. Not established: that later cell reconstructions are the autograph room in every board.
Marie-Antoinette did not file a later UNESCO form, a later Loeb colophon, or a later museum label as a personal act.
Causal path
How this event connects to drivers and indicators in the graph.
- ActorMarie-Antoinette
- contributed toFactShe is transferred to the Conciergerie on 1 August 1793 as a completed pre-trial detention
- strengthensDriverJudicial independence erosion (court capture)
- strengthensIndicatorRule of Law Gap from the Highest Governance Score
Cite this page
Factrail. (2026). She is transferred to the Conciergerie on 1 August 1793 as a completed pre-trial detention. Factrail. https://factrail.ai/facts/ma-conciergerie-1793
https://factrail.ai/facts/ma-conciergerie-1793
Accessed 16 October 2026.
By the Factrail desk · Method: how we source and score · Last reviewed
Dispute this factNamed here, or represent someone who is? Request a right of reply.