Skip to content
eventVerified

Louis-Charles is born on 27 March 1785 as a completed second-son dynastic event, later Louis XVII in the received file

Dauphin Louis-Joseph’s 1781 birth and 1789 death are neighbouring dynastic facts not split into extra rows here beyond this second son’s public heading. Lived 1755–1793; queen consort from 1774. In the causal graph this event strengthens Democratic Resilience, a driver that strengthens Having a say in government — an improving welfare path.

Sources: [1][2]

Read the full account

Context

Dauphin Louis-Joseph’s 1781 birth and 1789 death are neighbouring dynastic facts not split into extra rows here beyond this second son’s public heading.

Marie-Antoinette’s documented role is bounded by other offices and collaborators named in the sources below.

Lived 1755–1793; queen consort from 1774. Cake is a later slogan, not a sourced utterance. The Diamond Necklace is allegation and image. Fiscal crisis is not stored as her unique coefficient. Complex contribution is required.

Why it matters

A completed male-line birth in the public file is a succession path.

Who was responsible

Contribution type and responsibility level for each recorded actor — not sole-author shorthand.

What changed

Fact → Driver → Indicator. Relationship strength orders the paths; it is not the observed indicator movement.

    1. FactLouis-Charles is born on 27 March 1785 as a completed second-son dynastic event, later Louis XVII in the received file
    2. strengthensDriverDemocratic Resilience
    3. strengthensIndicators (3)Having a say in government
    Improving path

    impact weight 0.5 · Effect from 27 March 1785 · verified

    A completed male-line birth in the public file is a succession path.

    • Strengthens · Relationship strength 0.35 (weight 0.5 × strength 0.7)

      Observed

      29.8% of population aged 16-65 years · 8.13 below the normal line (2023)

      Worse than normal

      Two readings: 30.2% of population aged 16-65 years (2021) and 29.8% of population aged 16-65 years (2023).

      20212023

      Above normal = better

    • Strengthens · Relationship strength 0.23 (weight 0.5 × strength 0.45)

      Observed

      0.53 score from 0 to 1 · 0.34 below the normal line (2024)

      Worse than normal

      125 readings, 1900–2024: rose from 0.17 score from 0 to 1 to 0.53 score from 0 to 1.

      Above normal = better

    • Strengthens · Relationship strength 0.23 (weight 0.5 × strength 0.45)

      Observed

      0.55 index score (0-1) · 0.26 below the normal line (2024)

      Worse than normal

      Above normal = better

Evidence

The sources behind this fact and its verification state.

Verified2 sources on file
  1. 1.Britannica — Marie-AntoinetteEncyclopaedia Britannica · High credibility · verified
  2. 2.Château de Versailles — Marie-AntoinetteÉtablissement public du château, du musée et du domaine national de Versailles · High credibility · verified
What the sources establish

Britannica and Versailles print 27 March 1785 as the birth of Louis-Charles, later dauphin after his brother’s 1789 death.

Britannica and Versailles independently describe the 1785 birth.

Established: 27 March 1785 birth. Not established: every later Temple rumour as fact.

Marie-Antoinette did not file a later UNESCO form, a later Loeb colophon, or a later museum label as a personal act.

Causal path

How this event connects to drivers and indicators in the graph.

  1. ActorMarie-Antoinette
  2. contributed toFactLouis-Charles is born on 27 March 1785 as a completed second-son dynastic event, later Louis XVII in the received file
  3. strengthensDriverDemocratic Resilience
  4. strengthensIndicatorHaving a say in government

Cite this page

Factrail. (2026). Louis-Charles is born on 27 March 1785 as a completed second-son dynastic event, later Louis XVII in the received file. Factrail. https://factrail.ai/facts/ma-louis-charles-1785

https://factrail.ai/facts/ma-louis-charles-1785

Accessed 17 October 2026.

By the · Method: how we source and score · Last reviewed

Dispute this factNamed here, or represent someone who is? Request a right of reply.