The royal family is confined in the Temple from August 1792 as a completed detention
Separation of the son in 1793 is a later day. Lived 1755–1793; queen consort from 1774. In the causal graph this event strengthens Judicial independence erosion (court capture), a driver that strengthens Rule of Law Gap from the Highest Governance Score — a worsening welfare path.
Read the full account
Revolutionary officers share the custody. This is not yet the Conciergerie.
Context
A political detention without the later tribunal verdict is already a justice path. Separation of the son in 1793 is a later day.
Marie-Antoinette’s documented role is bounded by other offices and collaborators named in the sources below.
Lived 1755–1793; queen consort from 1774. Cake is a later slogan, not a sourced utterance. The Diamond Necklace is allegation and image. Fiscal crisis is not stored as her unique coefficient. Complex contribution is required.
Why it matters
A completed extra-ordinary detention of a deposed consort is a justice path. It is not a modern remand statistic.
Who was responsible
Contribution type and responsibility level for each recorded actor — not sole-author shorthand.
Marie-Antoinette
PersonDirect responsibility
responsibility level 0.4 · verified
What changed
Fact → Driver → Indicator. Relationship strength orders the paths; it is not the observed indicator movement.
- FactThe royal family is confined in the Temple from August 1792 as a completed detention
- strengthensDriverJudicial independence erosion (court capture)
- strengthensIndicators (4)Rule of Law Gap from the Highest Governance Score
impact weight 0.5 · Effect from 13 August 1792 · verified
A completed extra-ordinary detention of a deposed consort is a justice path. It is not a modern remand statistic.
- Worse
Strengthens · Relationship strength 0.36 (weight 0.5 × strength 0.72)
Observed
43.9 Score · 43.9 above the normal line (2024)
Worse than normal26 readings, 1996–2024: rose from 43 Score to 43.9 Score.
Normal is zero · any amount = worse
Weakens · Relationship strength 0.35 (weight 0.5 × strength 0.7)
Observed
0.55 index score (0-1) · 0.26 below the normal line (2024)
Worse than normalAbove normal = better
Weakens · Relationship strength 0.34 (weight 0.5 × strength 0.69)
Observed
0.62 score from 0 to 1 · 0.25 below the normal line (2024)
Worse than normal125 readings, 1900–2024: rose from 0.37 score from 0 to 1 to 0.62 score from 0 to 1.
Above normal = better
All indicators on this path (4)
Weakens · Relationship strength 0.15 (weight 0.5 × strength 0.3)
Observed
42.5 index score (0-100) · 7.53 below the normal line (2025)
Worse than normalAbove normal = better
Evidence
The sources behind this fact and its verification state.
- 1.Britannica — Marie-AntoinetteEncyclopaedia Britannica · High credibility · verified
- 2.Archives nationales (France)Archives nationales · High credibility · verified
What the sources establish
Britannica and later prison-and-city pages print mid-August 1792 as the transfer to the Temple.
Britannica and French archival catalogues independently describe Temple imprisonment.
Established: August 1792 Temple confinement as calendared. Not established: every later memoir as stenograph.
Marie-Antoinette did not file a later UNESCO form, a later Loeb colophon, or a later museum label as a personal act.
Causal path
How this event connects to drivers and indicators in the graph.
- ActorMarie-Antoinette
- contributed toFactThe royal family is confined in the Temple from August 1792 as a completed detention
- strengthensDriverJudicial independence erosion (court capture)
- strengthensIndicatorRule of Law Gap from the Highest Governance Score
Cite this page
Factrail. (2026). The royal family is confined in the Temple from August 1792 as a completed detention. Factrail. https://factrail.ai/facts/ma-temple-1792
https://factrail.ai/facts/ma-temple-1792
Accessed 15 October 2026.
By the Factrail desk · Method: how we source and score · Last reviewed
Dispute this factNamed here, or represent someone who is? Request a right of reply.