Printed Dio and standard accounts record the Parthian war of Verus under Marcus’s co-rule as loot and plague return
Dio-based standard accounts record Lucius Verus’s Parthian campaign, triumph, and the return that later writers link to plague, all under the joint principate. In the causal graph this event strengthens Institutional Corruption, a driver that strengthens Political corruption index — a worsening welfare path.
Read the full account
Dio-based standard accounts record Lucius Verus’s Parthian campaign, triumph, and the return that later writers link to plague, all under the joint principate. The dated carrier is the modern Dio. Marcus is co-emperor, not the sole field commander.
Context
Shared rule is why contribution is complex.
Marcus Aurelius is not the sole author of every later object, law, or museum label that uses the name. Shared work with courts, excavators, printers, spouses, officials, and later states does not erase a documented role, and it does not make an ancient person the signer of a twentieth-century statute.
Why it matters
A triumph is not a health policy.
A triumph is not a health policy.
Who was responsible
Contribution type and responsibility level for each recorded actor — not sole-author shorthand.
Marcus Aurelius
PersonDirect responsibility
responsibility level 0.28 · verified
Dated act under Marcus as emperor or as later printed subject. Scribes, heirs, editors, and museums share labour.
What changed
Fact → Driver → Indicator. Relationship strength orders the paths; it is not the observed indicator movement.
- FactPrinted Dio and standard accounts record the Parthian war of Verus under Marcus’s co-rule as loot and plague return
- strengthensDriverInstitutional Corruption
- strengthensIndicators (3)Political corruption index
impact weight 0.35 · Effect from 1 December 1927 · verified
A triumph is not a health policy.
Strengthens · Relationship strength 0.27 (weight 0.35 × strength 0.76)
Observed
0.48 score from 0 to 1 · 0.29 above the normal line (2024)
Worse than normal125 readings, 1900–2024: rose from 0.4 score from 0 to 1 to 0.48 score from 0 to 1.
Above normal = worse
Weakens · Relationship strength 0.22 (weight 0.35 × strength 0.62)
Observed
56.1 Score · 13.7 below the normal line (2024)
Worse than normal26 readings, 1996–2024: fell from 57 Score to 56.1 Score.
Above normal = better
Weakens · Relationship strength 0.17 (weight 0.35 × strength 0.5)
Observed
42.5 index score (0-100) · 7.53 below the normal line (2025)
Worse than normalAbove normal = better
Evidence
The sources behind this fact and its verification state.
- 1.Britannica — Marcus AureliusEncyclopaedia Britannica · High credibility · verified
- 2.LacusCurtius — Cassius DioUniversity of Chicago / LacusCurtius · High credibility · verified
What the sources establish
Later competitions, monuments, translations, UNESCO listings, and museums are not converted into extra lifetime acts. That reading is an impact-path choice, not a property stored on the Fact itself. Confidence is stated on the impact path. A later English edition is not a recovered autograph. If a number is not in the two records named above, it is not supplied here.
Causal path
How this event connects to drivers and indicators in the graph.
- ActorMarcus Aurelius
- contributed toFactPrinted Dio and standard accounts record the Parthian war of Verus under Marcus’s co-rule as loot and plague return
- strengthensDriverInstitutional Corruption
- strengthensIndicatorPolitical corruption index
Cite this page
Factrail. (2026). Printed Dio and standard accounts record the Parthian war of Verus under Marcus’s co-rule as loot and plague return. Factrail. https://factrail.ai/facts/ma-verus-parthian-loot
https://factrail.ai/facts/ma-verus-parthian-loot
Accessed 16 October 2026.
By the Factrail desk · Method: how we source and score · Last reviewed
Dispute this factNamed here, or represent someone who is? Request a right of reply.