Shakespeare agrees with William Replingham to protect his tithe income if Welcombe is enclosed
On 28 October 1614 Shakespeare reached an agreement with William Replingham, surviving as an incomplete copy (SBT ER27/3), that he would be compensated for loss to his tithes 'by reason of anie Inclosure or decaye of Tyllage' at Welcombe. In the causal graph this event weakens Food-Supply Resilience, a driver that weakens Poverty headcount ratio at $3.00 a day (2021 PPP) (% of population) — a worsening welfare path.
Read the full account
On 28 October 1614 Shakespeare reached an agreement with William Replingham, surviving as an incomplete copy (SBT ER27/3), that he would be compensated for loss to his tithes 'by reason of anie Inclosure or decaye of Tyllage' at Welcombe. This is a completed private contract in the face of an enclosure scheme the Stratford corporation opposed.
Context
Arthur Mainwaring and Replingham fronted a scheme later seen as serving William Combe. The corporation feared tithe loss if arable became sheep pasture. Shakespeare, himself a tithe-holder and four-yardland freeholder, insured his income. Thomas Greene's later notes show Shakespeare telling him the enclosers would not go beyond Gospel Bush.
Why it matters
This is the sharpest agrarian welfare document in the dossier. Food-supply resilience is weakened when tillage decays; Shakespeare's paper protects rent, not tillage.
Who was responsible
Contribution type and responsibility level for each recorded actor — not sole-author shorthand.
William Shakespeare
PersonDirect responsibility
responsibility level 0.7 · verified
He contracted to be compensated for tithe loss from enclosure rather than joining the borough's opposition.
What changed
Fact → Driver → Indicator. Relationship strength orders the paths; it is not the observed indicator movement.
- FactShakespeare agrees with William Replingham to protect his tithe income if Welcombe is enclosed
- weakensDriverFood-Supply Resilience
- weakensIndicators (2)Poverty headcount ratio at $3.00 a day (2021 PPP) (% of population)
impact weight 0.5 · Effect from 28 October 1614 · verified
Enclosure converting tillage to pasture threatened local grain supply; Shakespeare insured his tithe rent against that conversion.
Weakens · Relationship strength 0.32 (weight 0.5 × strength 0.64)
Observed
10.4% · 10.2 above the normal line (2024)
Worse than normal7 readings, 2018–2024: fell from 11.1% to 10.4%.
Above normal = worse
Weakens · Relationship strength 0.29 (weight 0.5 × strength 0.58)
Observed
27.9% · 19.9 above the normal line (2024)
Worse than normal7 readings, 2018–2024: rose from 21.5% to 27.9%.
Above normal = worse
- FactShakespeare agrees with William Replingham to protect his tithe income if Welcombe is enclosed
- strengthensDriverHousehold Purchasing Power
- weakensIndicators (2)Global Consumer Price Inflation (annual %)
impact weight 0.35 · Effect from 28 October 1614 · verified
Weakens · Relationship strength 0.14 (weight 0.35 × strength 0.4)
Observed
5.8 annual % change in CPI · 2.3 above the normal line (2024)
Better than normal5 readings, 2020–2024: rose from 3.3 annual % change in CPI to 5.8 annual % change in CPI.
Moving normal line
- Better
Weakens · Relationship strength 0.12 (weight 0.35 × strength 0.35)
Observed
10.4% · 10.2 above the normal line (2024)
Worse than normal7 readings, 2018–2024: fell from 11.1% to 10.4%.
Above normal = worse
Evidence
The sources behind this fact and its verification state.
- 1.Shakespeare Documented — 28 October 1614 Replingham/Shakespeare tithe-enclosure agreementFolger Shakespeare Library / Shakespeare Birthplace Trust · High credibility · verified
- 2.Shakespeare Birthplace Trust — William Shakespeare biographyShakespeare Birthplace Trust · High credibility · verified
What the sources establish
The agreement is edited on Shakespeare Documented with Bearman's commentary (doi 10.37078/519). It is an official local legal copy plus independent scholarly edition. It establishes Shakespeare's contractual posture. It does not establish that he dug the ditches. Wikipedia is not used as a causal source.
Established: 28 October 1614 compensation agreement. Not established: that enclosure was completed to the full feared extent in his lifetime; that he ordered violence against commoners. Confidence high on the contract.
The event remains dated 1614-10-28. Shakespeare's documented role is: He contracted to be compensated for tithe loss from enclosure rather than joining the borough's opposition. Enclosure converting tillage to pasture threatened local grain supply; Shakespeare insured his tithe rent against that conversion. Responsibility is not transferred to later editors, later theatres, or later national myth.
The event remains dated 1614-10-28.
The event remains dated 1614-10-28.
The event remains dated 1614-10-28.
The event remains dated 1614-10-28.
The event remains dated 1614-10-28.
Causal path
How this event connects to drivers and indicators in the graph.
- ActorWilliam Shakespeare
- contributed toFactShakespeare agrees with William Replingham to protect his tithe income if Welcombe is enclosed
- weakensDrivers (2)Food-Supply Resilience
- weakensIndicatorPoverty headcount ratio at $3.00 a day (2021 PPP) (% of population)
Cite this page
Factrail. (2026). Shakespeare agrees with William Replingham to protect his tithe income if Welcombe is enclosed. Factrail. https://factrail.ai/facts/shakespeare-replingham-agreement-1614
https://factrail.ai/facts/shakespeare-replingham-agreement-1614
Accessed 15 October 2026.
By the Factrail desk · Method: how we source and score · Last reviewed
Dispute this factNamed here, or represent someone who is? Request a right of reply.