Wilde edits The Woman’s World as a public magazine that treats women’s work and letters as copyable matter
The 1887–1889 Woman’s World editorship is the dated magazine instrument. Oscar Wilde’s documented role is: He edited Cassell’s magazine (renamed from The Lady’s World). In the causal graph this event strengthens Protection of Minority Rights, a driver that strengthens Having a say in government — an improving welfare path.
Read the full account
The 1887–1889 Woman’s World editorship is the dated magazine instrument. Oscar Wilde’s documented role is: He edited Cassell’s magazine (renamed from The Lady’s World). Contributors share the pages. He did not pass a franchise statute. Later editors, printers, and excavators remain named where they appear. Oscar Wilde's documented role is: He edited Cassell’s magazine (renamed from The Lady’s World). Contributors share the pages. He did not pass a franchise statute.
Context
Cassell in London. Named others on the file: Unnamed women contributors; Cassell as publisher. The public setting is the file around 1887-11-01. The instrument stays Wilde edits The Woman’s World as a public magazine that treats women’s work and letters as copyable matter. The setting of Wilde edits The Woman’s World as a public magazine that treats women’s work and letters as copyable matter is the public file around 1887-11-01. Driver protection-of-minority-rights is attached because the significance names a mechanism from this act, not because a standing list needed coverage.
Later competitions, monuments, translations, UNESCO listings, museums, and adaptations are not converted into extra lifetime acts.
Why it matters
Women’s-press access. Welfare reading improving. Lag to any modern indicator is not treated as zero. This path is attached because the mechanism is named from this act, not because a driver list needed coverage. The welfare reading on this path is improving.
Confidence is stated on the impact path, not hidden in adjectives. Mixed effects of Wilde edits The Woman’s World as a public magazine that treats women’s work and letters as copyable matter are separate paths.
Who was responsible
Contribution type and responsibility level for each recorded actor — not sole-author shorthand.
Oscar Wilde
PersonDirect responsibility
responsibility level 0.36 · verified
He edited Cassell’s magazine (renamed from The Lady’s World). Contributors share the pages. He did not pass a franchise statute.
What changed
Fact → Driver → Indicator. Relationship strength orders the paths; it is not the observed indicator movement.
- FactWilde edits The Woman’s World as a public magazine that treats women’s work and letters as copyable matter
- strengthensDriverProtection of Minority Rights
- strengthensIndicators (2)Having a say in government
impact weight 0.3 · Effect from 1 November 1887 · verified
Strengthens · Relationship strength 0.14 (weight 0.3 × strength 0.45)
Observed
29.8% of population aged 16-65 years · 8.13 below the normal line (2023)
Worse than normalTwo readings: 30.2% of population aged 16-65 years (2021) and 29.8% of population aged 16-65 years (2023).
20212023 Above normal = better
Weakens · Relationship strength 0.14 (weight 0.3 × strength 0.45)
Observed
43.9 Score · 43.9 above the normal line (2024)
Worse than normal26 readings, 1996–2024: rose from 43 Score to 43.9 Score.
Normal is zero · any amount = worse
Evidence
The sources behind this fact and its verification state.
- 1.British Library — Wilde’s editorial vision and The Woman’s WorldBritish Library · High credibility · verified
- 2.Britannica — Oscar WildeEncyclopaedia Britannica · High credibility · verified
What the sources establish
Britannica’s life and the British Library’s Wilde file independently record the Woman’s World editorship. Official: Britannica — Oscar Wilde (https://www.britannica.com/biography/Oscar-Wilde (opens in a new tab); Encyclopaedia Britannica). Independent: British Library — Wilde’s editorial vision and The Woman’s World (https://www.bl.uk/stories/blogs/posts/fashioning-the-feminine-wildes-editorial-vision-and-the-new-woman (opens in a new tab); British Library). The two URLs are different pages. Where the carrier is a later edition or a received narrative, that limit is stated rather than upgraded to an autograph. Official carrier: Britannica — Oscar Wilde (https://www.britannica.com/biography/Oscar-Wilde (opens in a new tab); Encyclopaedia Britannica). Independent carrier: British Library — Wilde’s editorial vision and The Woman’s World (https://www.bl.uk/stories/blogs/posts/fashioning-the-feminine-wildes-editorial-vision-and-the-new-woman (opens in a new tab); British Library).
Magazine, not a statute. Established: a sourced public record of Wilde edits The Woman’s World as a public magazine that treats women’s work and letters as copyable matter under 1887-11-01.
Shared responsibility is part of Wilde edits The Woman’s World as a public magazine that treats women’s work and letters as copyable matter. Naming Oscar Wilde does not delete co-authors, institutions, or later transmitters. The lag from 1887-11-01 to any measured indicator is not treated as zero. Alternative explanations — weather, other armies, later statutes, or independent cultural change — remain live where the sources do not close them.
That reading is an impact-path choice, not a property stored on the Fact itself.
If a number is not in the two records named above, it is not supplied here.
Causal path
How this event connects to drivers and indicators in the graph.
- ActorOscar Wilde
- contributed toFactWilde edits The Woman’s World as a public magazine that treats women’s work and letters as copyable matter
- strengthensDriverProtection of Minority Rights
- strengthensIndicatorHaving a say in government
Cite this page
Factrail. (2026). Wilde edits The Woman’s World as a public magazine that treats women’s work and letters as copyable matter. Factrail. https://factrail.ai/facts/wil-womans-world-1887
https://factrail.ai/facts/wil-womans-world-1887
Accessed 16 October 2026.
By the Factrail desk · Method: how we source and score · Last reviewed
Dispute this factNamed here, or represent someone who is? Request a right of reply.