Skip to content
DriverOngoing causal factorgovernance

Hemedti RSF war

Hemedti RSF war is one continuing domestic mechanism in Sudan: the Rapid Support Forces commander who led the 3 June 2019 dispersal of the Khartoum sit-in as recorded by Human Rights Watch, commanded RSF units when fighting erupted on 15 April 2023, and whose forces imposed the El Fasher siege from May 2024 and captured the city in late October 2025. Its strongest welfare pathway: it weakens Having a say in government, a worse welfare reading.

Read the full background

What this driver is

Hemedti RSF war is one continuing domestic mechanism in Sudan: the Rapid Support Forces commander who led the 3 June 2019 dispersal of the Khartoum sit-in as recorded by Human Rights Watch, commanded RSF units when fighting erupted on 15 April 2023, and whose forces imposed the El Fasher siege from May 2024 and captured the city in late October 2025. It is a mechanism, not a tribal-mediator brochure and not a Soviet-scope repression row.

The driver is not a unique Darfur or El Fasher death census invented here, not Ukraine, not Nagorno-Karabakh, and not eastern Congo. Neighbouring mechanisms — civic space, electoral integrity — can move with this file or against it. They do not replace it. Abdel Fattah al-Burhan is live as Abdel Fattah al-Burhan. This node is 3 June 2019, 15 April 2023, and the El Fasher siege-and-capture file.

It applies to Sudan from the 2013 RSF command through the 2023– war and the 2025 El Fasher capture. It is not proxy-war-intensity (1919–50) and not territorial-revisionism. It is not burhan-saf-civil-war.

The legal core is HRW’s June 2019 sit-in products; Reuters/BBC on 15 April 2023; and OHCHR/HRW products on the El Fasher siege and 24–30 October 2025 offensive. A speech that calls RSF a popular defence force does not change the mechanism. IPC famine classifications are neighbouring.

Mechanism

The file moves welfare through named channels.

First, the 3 June 2019 sit-in dispersal. Human Rights Watch recorded that security forces led by the RSF opened fire on the Khartoum sit-in at dawn on 3 June 2019, killing scores and injuring hundreds. Doctors’ groups and later HRW research put the 3–18 June toll above 120. The TMC health ministry acknowledged 61 killed on 3 June. Those instruments disagree. This page does not invent a unique integer or average them into a size. Hemedti commanded the RSF. Burhan chaired the TMC and is live, not minted here.

Second, RSF war command. On 15 April 2023 fighting erupted in Khartoum. Hemedti called Burhan a criminal. RSF claimed key sites. First-shot claims are contested.

Third, El Fasher siege and capture. From May 2024 OHCHR recorded an RSF siege of El Fasher. On 24–30 October 2025 OHCHR documented a final RSF offensive and capture. HRW interviewed refugees in eastern Chad. IPC later confirmed famine in El Fasher town. This page does not invent a unique October 2025 integer.

Fourth, command. He has commanded RSF since 2013. Sharing 2019 TMC membership with Burhan is not a reason to drop 3 June 2019.

Timing is hours for a sit-in dispersal and years for a siege. A later genuine integration of RSF into a civilian army would be a new fact. It would not hang this driver on Glavlit, Ukraine, Karabakh, or a unique gold-export coefficient invented here.

Evidence base

The best evidence is HRW June 2019 products, Reuters/BBC 15 April 2023, and OHCHR/HRW El Fasher products.

Human Rights Watch, 4 June 2019 (https://www.hrw.org/news/2019/06/04/sudan-halt-attacks-protesters (opens in a new tab)). Human Rights Watch, 17 November 2019 report. Reuters, 15 April 2023. BBC, 15–16 April 2023. OHCHR El Fasher offensive report, 13 February 2026. Human Rights Watch, 5 February 2026 interview on El Fasher’s fall. Reuters, 3 November 2025, IPC famine in al-Fashir.

This page does not invent a unique massacre integer or copy OHCHR interview tallies as Contribution.size.

Evidence is strongest for RSF-led 3 June 2019, RSF command on 15 April 2023, and RSF siege-and-capture of El Fasher. It is weaker for any unique first-hour casualty. It is weakest where a gold-or-mediation slogan is asked to rebate 3 June 2019.

Effect on welfare indicators

This driver, when it actually runs, is a first-order channel into voice-and-accountability series.

  • Having a say in government: direction lower voice when RSF fires on a sit-in, commands a capital war, and starves a city under siege. Horizon: a reporting year. Confidence: high for the dated HRW and OHCHR instruments.

An electricity-access or PISA path does not follow without a sourced channel. Education, CPI, and WJP padding are not this family.

The welfare sign of the driver on voice is negative: strengthening RSF war command reduces a higher-is-better say-in-government reading. That is the opposite of treating 15 April 2023 as popular defence.

Interactions and contested points

The mechanism interacts with civic space because 3 June 2019 and El Fasher are force-and-siege files. Reinforcement is obvious when those dates sit with 15 April 2023. Offsetting is the claim that SAF aggression rebates RSF. SAF conduct is Burhan’s live owned driver. It does not cancel 3 June 2019.

HRW identified RSF as leading the lethal attack. Burhan is live. This page stores RSF command. It does not mint a second Burhan.

A second competing view is that this is ukraine-war or eastern-drc-m23-rdf. It is not. Evening waves never mint those slugs.

Established: 3 June 2019 RSF-led dispersal as recorded by HRW; 15 April 2023 RSF command of the outbreak; RSF siege of El Fasher from May 2024 and capture in late October 2025. Not established: a unique integer reconciling doctors, ministry, OHCHR interviews, or IPC stocks as Contribution.size. A later genuine civilian contest would be a new fact. It would not rename this driver as mediation.

What it changes

Indicators this driver moves, strongest relation first. Relation strength is separate from the observed state.

  • Weakens · 80% impact strength

    Observed

    29.8% of population aged 16-65 years · 8.13 below the normal line (2023)

    Worse than normal

    Two readings: 30.2% of population aged 16-65 years (2021) and 29.8% of population aged 16-65 years (2023).

    20212023

    Above normal = better · Lag ~30 d · Relation verified

Key facts moving this driver

Ranked by impact weight, then verification, then recency.

Driver over time

The dated facts recorded on this driver, oldest first.

Causal path

Facts move the driver; the driver moves indicators. Open the full network to inspect each link.

  1. Facts4 recorded
  2. moveDriverHemedti RSF war
  3. weakensIndicatorHaving a say in government

Evidence

Review status of the facts behind this driver.

Review status · 4 factsReviewed 4

Documented Jun 2019 – Oct 2025

How Factrail grades evidence

By the Factrail desk · Method: how we source and score · Last reviewed · Sources: 4

Questions

Who is responsible for Hemedti RSF war?

Factrail's graph links Hemedti to Hemedti RSF war through sourced facts.

When did Hemedti RSF war start?

3 June 2019: RSF-led forces disperse the Khartoum sit-in with lethal force.

How does Hemedti RSF war affect people?

It is linked to Having a say in government in Factrail's graph.