Skip to content
oversight findingVerified

UN and US reporting alleges UAE support to Sudan’s RSF; Abu Dhabi denies

In 2024 UN expert reporting and US official statements alleged UAE material support to Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces in the war that began 15 April 2023. In the causal graph this event strengthens Forced-Displacement Scale, a driver that strengthens People Internally Displaced by Conflict and Violence (IDMC) — a worsening welfare path.

Sudanese refugees living in a camp in Chad during the 2023 Sudan conflict. Photo: Henry Wilkins / Voice of America, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Screengrab_of_refugee_camp_from_Number_of_Refugees_Who_Fled_Sudan_for_Chad_Double_in_Week.jpg).

Sources: [1][2][3][4][5]+3

Read the full account

In 2024 UN expert reporting and US official statements alleged UAE material support to Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces in the war that began 15 April 2023. Abu Dhabi denied.

Context

The UN Panel of Experts and US officials reported. The UAE denied arming the RSF and cited humanitarian aid. Allegation is not a finding. Investigation is not a conviction. Mohamed bin Zayed is the union principal. He did not write the UN panel.

Sudan’s 15 April 2023 war start is a neighbouring Hemedti–Burhan file. Libya 2019 is an earlier Africa force file.

The president of the United Arab Emirates is elected by the Federal Supreme Council of the seven emirates and is, in this case, also Ruler of Abu Dhabi and supreme commander of the armed forces. He does not write UNFCCC consensus texts by himself, IAEA operating licences, Israeli Knesset statutes, or UN panel reports.

Why it matters

The path is humanitarian access: alleged support to one party in Sudan’s war is stored as an oversight cluster. It must not be written as a completed finding of authorship of the war.

Who was responsible

Contribution type and responsibility level for each recorded actor — not sole-author shorthand.

  • Mohammed Bin Zayed Al Nahyan

    Person

    Direct responsibility

    responsibility level 0.4 · verified

    He is UAE principal. UN/US reporting alleged support. Abu Dhabi denied. A panel is not a conviction.

What changed

Fact → Driver → Indicator. Relationship strength orders the paths; it is not the observed indicator movement.

    1. FactUN and US reporting alleges UAE support to Sudan’s RSF; Abu Dhabi denies
    2. strengthensDriverForced-Displacement Scale
    3. strengthensIndicators (2)People Internally Displaced by Conflict and Violence (IDMC)
    Worsening path

    impact weight 0.49 · verified

    Military support to a belligerent can sustain operations in a war that was producing mass civilian flight. Weight basis: The UN Panel found allegations of external military support credible; the link is material but indirect because the UAE was not the force carrying out displacement. Weight 0.49 is the pack's qualitative severity class for this event, not an empirical coefficient.

    1. FactUN and US reporting alleges UAE support to Sudan’s RSF; Abu Dhabi denies
    2. weakensDriverHumanitarian Access
    3. strengthensIndicatorPeople Internally Displaced by Conflict and Violence (IDMC)
    Improving path

    impact weight 0.4 · Effect from 15 January 2024 · verified

    If the alleged supply is real it would worsen Sudanese humanitarian access; the row stores an allegation cluster, not a verdict.

    1. FactUN and US reporting alleges UAE support to Sudan’s RSF; Abu Dhabi denies
    2. strengthensDriverPolitical Polarization
    3. weakensIndicators (2)Having a say in government
    Worsening path

    impact weight 0.35 · Effect from 15 January 2024 · verified

    The allegation-and-denial cluster intensified a regional proxy reading of Sudan’s war.

    • Having a say in government

      via Political Polarization

      Worse

      Weakens · Relationship strength 0.16 (weight 0.35 × strength 0.45)

      Observed

      29.8% of population aged 16-65 years · 8.13 below the normal line (2023)

      Worse than normal

      Two readings: 30.2% of population aged 16-65 years (2021) and 29.8% of population aged 16-65 years (2023).

      20212023

      Above normal = better

    • Rule of Law Gap from the Highest Governance Score

      via Political Polarization

      Worse

      Strengthens · Relationship strength 0.16 (weight 0.35 × strength 0.45)

      Observed

      43.9 Score · 43.9 above the normal line (2024)

      Worse than normal

      26 readings, 1996–2024: rose from 43 Score to 43.9 Score.

      Normal is zero · any amount = worse

Evidence

The sources behind this fact and its verification state.

Verified8 sources on file
  1. 1.Statement by the UAE Assistant Minister for Security and Military Affairs, H.E. Salem Aljaberi:UAE Ministry of Foreign Affairs · verified
  2. 2.Treasury Sanctions Sudanese Paramilitary Leader, Weapons Supplier, and Related CompaniesU.S. Department of the Treasury · verified
  3. 3.Final report of the Panel of Experts on the Sudan (S/2024/65)United Nations · verified
  4. 4.Sudan: Advanced Chinese weaponry provided by UAE identified in breach of arms embargo – new investigationAmnesty International · verified
  5. 5.The Court rejects Sudan’s Request for the indication of provisional measures and orders that the case be removed from the General ListInternational Court of Justice · verified
  6. 6.Final report of the Panel of Experts on the SudanUnited Nations Security Council · verified
  7. 7.Reuters — UAE denies supplying Sudan’s RSF as UN reporting mountsReuters · High credibility · verified
  8. 8.UN Security Council — Sudan sanctions and expert reporting 2024United Nations · High credibility · verified
What the sources establish

United Nations carries the official instrument or communique. Reuters records the same dated act independently.

Established: 2024 UN/US reporting alleging UAE support to the RSF, with a contemporaneous UAE denial, independently reported.

UN/US reporting alleged support. Abu Dhabi denied. A panel is not a conviction.. A later repeal, court stay, or successor order would be a different Fact with a different date. That pair identifies UN and US reporting alleges UAE support to Sudan’s RSF; Abu Dhabi denies, not a later speech about UN and US reporting alleges UAE support to Sudan’s RSF; Abu Dhabi denies.

Co-authors and later implementers named in Context remain on the file. If a later repeal, stay, or successor decree exists, it needs its own date and its own row. The contribution described on this Person row is limited to He is UAE principal. UN/US reporting alleged support. Abu Dhabi denied. A panel is not a conviction. That limit is the alternative to treating office-holding as authorship of every later series.

The United Nations Panel of Experts on the Sudan examined allegations that military support reached the Rapid Support Forces through Amdjarass in Chad and judged allegations concerning support from the United Arab Emirates and Chad to be credible. The Panel described sophisticated weapons and ammunition entering the conflict while Sudan’s war was driving large-scale civilian displacement. The live record already carries humanitarian and political links. The added displacement route is narrower: documented third-party military support can strengthen a belligerent’s ability to continue operations that uproot civilians. The weight is kept below the direct-perpetrator range because the source concerns external supply to a third party rather than an Emirati force conducting the displacement itself.

The January 2024 UN Panel of Experts said allegations that weapons and ammunition were flown through Am Djarass in Chad and handed to the RSF were “credible,” while recording that transfers of arms into Darfur violated the embargo; the UAE denied involvement. In May 2025, Amnesty International identified a 2024-made Chinese GB50A bomb used by the RSF near al-Malha and AH-4 howitzers captured after RSF withdrawals, concluding the weapons were almost certainly re-exported by the UAE. U.S. Treasury had separately stated in January 2025 that UAE-based Capital Tap Holding provided money and weapons to the RSF. The UAE called Amnesty’s report misleading and said it supplies no weapons to any warring party. The ICJ’s May 2025 removal of Sudan v. UAE was for manifest lack of jurisdiction because of the UAE reservation to Article IX of the Genocide Convention; it was not a merits ruling on the arms allegations.

Causal path

How this event connects to drivers and indicators in the graph.

  1. ActorMohammed Bin Zayed Al Nahyan
  2. contributed toFactUN and US reporting alleges UAE support to Sudan’s RSF; Abu Dhabi denies
  3. strengthensDrivers (3)Forced-Displacement Scale
  4. strengthensIndicatorPeople Internally Displaced by Conflict and Violence (IDMC)

Cite this page

Factrail. (2026). UN and US reporting alleges UAE support to Sudan’s RSF; Abu Dhabi denies. Factrail. https://factrail.ai/facts/ae-sudan-un-panel-2024

https://factrail.ai/facts/ae-sudan-un-panel-2024

Accessed 15 October 2026.

By the Factrail desk · Method: how we source and score · Last reviewed

Dispute this factNamed here, or represent someone who is? Request a right of reply.