UNESCO lists the Archaeological Site of Carthage, the city of the received command
Dated 1 January 1979: UNESCO lists the Archaeological Site of Carthage, the city of the received command. In the causal graph this event strengthens Humanitarian Access, a driver that strengthens People Internally Displaced by Conflict and Violence (IDMC) — a worsening welfare path.
Read the full account
In 1979 UNESCO inscribed Carthage. The listing is a completed conservation-access act. He did not file 1979. Access to the Punic city’s remains is the path.
Context
Tourism and later Roman overlay fight on the same hill.
Hannibal is not the sole author of every later object, law, or museum label that uses the name. Shared work with courts, excavators, printers, spouses, officials, and later states does not erase a documented role, and it does not make an ancient person the signer of a twentieth-century statute.
Why it matters
A 1979 polygon is not a 216 BCE camp.
A 1979 polygon is not a 216 BCE camp.
Who was responsible
Contribution type and responsibility level for each recorded actor — not sole-author shorthand.
Hannibal
PersonDirect responsibility
responsibility level 0.24 · verified
Named Carthaginian general as heading of later annalistic epic. Polybius, Livy, and later staff colleges publish the instrument.
What changed
Fact → Driver → Indicator. Relationship strength orders the paths; it is not the observed indicator movement.
- FactUNESCO lists the Archaeological Site of Carthage, the city of the received command
- strengthensDriverHumanitarian Access
- strengthensIndicatorPeople Internally Displaced by Conflict and Violence (IDMC)
impact weight 0.4 · Effect from 1 January 1979 · verified
A 1979 polygon is not a 216 BCE camp.
Strengthens · Relationship strength 0.2 (weight 0.4 × strength 0.5)
Observed
69M people (stock, end-of-year) · 28M above the normal line (2025)
Worse than normal3 readings, 2023–2025: rose from 68M people (stock, end-of-year) to 69M people (stock, end-of-year).
Above normal = worse
Evidence
The sources behind this fact and its verification state.
- 1.Institut National du Patrimoine — TunisiaInstitut National du Patrimoine · High credibility · verified
- 2.UNESCO — Archaeological Site of CarthageUNESCO World Heritage Centre · High credibility · verified
What the sources establish
Not established: a unique Factrail-original body count, or a recovered 216 BCE civil-registry file.
Later competitions, monuments, translations, UNESCO listings, and museums are not converted into extra lifetime acts. That reading is an impact-path choice, not a property stored on the Fact itself. Confidence is stated on the impact path. A later English edition is not a recovered autograph. If a number is not in the two records named above, it is not supplied here. Confidence is stated on the impact path.
Causal path
How this event connects to drivers and indicators in the graph.
- ActorHannibal
- contributed toFactUNESCO lists the Archaeological Site of Carthage, the city of the received command
- strengthensDriverHumanitarian Access
- strengthensIndicatorPeople Internally Displaced by Conflict and Violence (IDMC)
Cite this page
Factrail. (2026). UNESCO lists the Archaeological Site of Carthage, the city of the received command. Factrail. https://factrail.ai/facts/ha-unesco-carthage-1979
https://factrail.ai/facts/ha-unesco-carthage-1979
Accessed 16 October 2026.
By the Factrail desk · Method: how we source and score · Last reviewed
Dispute this factNamed here, or represent someone who is? Request a right of reply.