Hegel and Schelling issue the Critical Journal of Philosophy
In 1802–03 Hegel and Schelling issued Kritisches Journal der Philosophie at Jena, a short-lived review in which Hegel published substantial essays (including on faith and knowledge and on natural right) under a shared editorial roof. In the causal graph this event strengthens Digital Learning Access, a driver that weakens Learning Poverty Rate (low- and middle-income countries) — an improving welfare path.
Read the full account
In 1802–03 Hegel and Schelling issued Kritisches Journal der Philosophie at Jena, a short-lived review in which Hegel published substantial essays (including on faith and knowledge and on natural right) under a shared editorial roof. It is not the 1827 Berlin Jahrbücher, not the 1807 Phenomenology, and not the later Schelling split. Schelling’s name opened doors; Hegel wrote heavy copy. The row stores one educational review. The 1802 natural-right essay is a signed argument inside the carrier; 1827 Jahrbücher are a later Berlin camp organ. Unpaid Privatdozent hours are a labour neighbour of the same hill.
Context
A review that teaches a public how to map Fichte, Jacobi, and natural right is education. It is also a pre-break alliance object. Jena students could buy the numbers. A short-lived journal is still a public syllabus. Glauben und Wissen stays inside this review cluster rather than minting a second 1802 book; 1827 Jahrbücher are a later, partisan Berlin organ.
Why it matters
Improving education path: a copyable review. High confidence on 1802–03. Modest weight. 1827 Jahrbücher remain a polarizing later organ. 1807 split remains a later sign.
If a number is not in the two records named above, it is not supplied here.
Who was responsible
Contribution type and responsibility level for each recorded actor — not sole-author shorthand.
Direct responsibility
responsibility level 0.32 · verified
He co-edited the 1802–03 Kritisches Journal with Schelling and wrote major essays. The shop issued it. Complex co-editor, not a later party review.
What changed
Fact → Driver → Indicator. Relationship strength orders the paths; it is not the observed indicator movement.
- FactHegel and Schelling issue the Critical Journal of Philosophy
- strengthensDriverDigital Learning Access
- weakensIndicators (3)Learning Poverty Rate (low- and middle-income countries)
impact weight 0.35 · Effect from 1 January 1802 · verified
A documented joint philosophical review made post-Kantian argument copyable, a modest education path before the 1807 split.
Weakens · Relationship strength 0.14 (weight 0.35 × strength 0.4)
Observed
70% of 10-year-olds · 70 above the normal line (2022)
Worse than normalTwo readings: 57% of 10-year-olds (2019) and 70% of 10-year-olds (2022).
20192022 Above normal = worse
Strengthens · Relationship strength 0.12 (weight 0.35 × strength 0.35)
Observed
472 PISA score points · 28 below the normal line (2022)
Worse than normal7 readings, 2003–2022: fell from 499 PISA score points to 472 PISA score points.
Above normal = better
Weakens · Relationship strength 0.1 (weight 0.35 × strength 0.3)
Observed
11% of primary-school-age children · 11 above the normal line (2023)
Worse than normalAbove normal = worse
Evidence
The sources behind this fact and its verification state.
- 1.Friedrich Schiller University JenaFriedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena · High credibility · verified
- 2.Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy — HegelStanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy · High credibility · verified
What the sources establish
Jena University locates the 1802 philosophy market. SEP independently dates the Critical Journal collaboration and Hegel’s 1802–03 essays. Official: https://www.uni-jena.de/en (opens in a new tab). Independent: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/hegel/ (opens in a new tab). The records establish the 1802–03 journal. They do not establish a unique later review-citation series. 1827 Jahrbücher are not this Jena review. A showing of no such journal would change the row.
Established: Hegel co-edited the Critical Journal of Philosophy in 1802–03 with Schelling. Not established: that 1827 is this journal, or that Phenomenology is this review. A 1802 without the journal would change the row. A contradictory 1802 without the journal would change the row.
Confidence is stated on the impact path, not hidden in adjectives. Critical Journal is not the 1827 Jahrbücher and not Phenomenology. Mixed effects of Hegel and Schelling issue the Critical Journal of Philosophy are separate paths.
Later competitions, monuments, translations, UNESCO listings, museums, and adaptations are not converted into extra lifetime acts.
That reading is an impact-path choice, not a property stored on the Fact itself.
Shared responsibility is part of Hegel and Schelling issue the Critical Journal of Philosophy. Naming Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel does not delete co-authors, institutions, or later transmitters. The lag from 1802-01-01 to any measured indicator is not treated as zero. Alternative explanations — weather, other armies, later statutes, or independent cultural change — remain live where the sources do not close them.
Causal path
How this event connects to drivers and indicators in the graph.
- ActorGeorg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel
- contributed toFactHegel and Schelling issue the Critical Journal of Philosophy
- strengthensDriverDigital Learning Access
- weakensIndicatorLearning Poverty Rate (low- and middle-income countries)
Cite this page
Factrail. (2026). Hegel and Schelling issue the Critical Journal of Philosophy. Factrail. https://factrail.ai/facts/hg-kritisches-journal-1802
https://factrail.ai/facts/hg-kritisches-journal-1802
Accessed 16 October 2026.
By the Factrail desk · Method: how we source and score · Last reviewed
Dispute this factNamed here, or represent someone who is? Request a right of reply.