Iran’s execution tally remains high in the first months of Pezeshkian’s presidency
In 2024–25 Iran’s judiciary continued a high execution tally documented by UN special rapporteurs and rights groups after Pezeshkian’s inauguration. In the causal graph this event strengthens Judicial independence erosion (court capture), a driver that strengthens Rule of Law Gap from the Highest Governance Score — a worsening welfare path.
Read the full account
In 2024–25 Iran’s judiciary continued a high execution tally documented by UN special rapporteurs and rights groups after Pezeshkian’s inauguration. He did not gazette an execution moratorium.
Context
The judiciary answers to the Leader more than to the president. Neighbouring hijab non-repeal is a parallel rights file. A president who can pardon some and does not freeze the docket owns a share of continued practice.
Hijab 2024 is neighbouring social-rights non-repeal. 2026 wartime crackdowns are later interior.
The President of Iran is head of the executive, not commander-in-chief of the IRGC or the armed forces. That command sits with the Supreme Leader. Pezeshkian does not write IAEA Board resolutions, US Treasury designations, or Israeli cabinet strike orders. An IRGC operation is not automatically his Fact.
Why it matters
The path is justice: a completed high execution tally without a presidential moratorium is a rights cost on the executive that could have sought a freeze.
Who was responsible
Contribution type and responsibility level for each recorded actor — not sole-author shorthand.
Masoud Pezeshkian
PersonDirect responsibility
responsibility level 0.4 · verified
He did not gazette a moratorium. The judiciary hanged. The Leader’s office outranked. UN rapporteurs counted.
What changed
Fact → Driver → Indicator. Relationship strength orders the paths; it is not the observed indicator movement.
- FactIran’s execution tally remains high in the first months of Pezeshkian’s presidency
- strengthensDriverJudicial independence erosion (court capture)
- strengthensIndicators (4)Rule of Law Gap from the Highest Governance Score
impact weight 0.4 · Effect from 31 December 2024 · verified
- Worse
Strengthens · Relationship strength 0.29 (weight 0.4 × strength 0.72)
Observed
43.9 Score · 43.9 above the normal line (2024)
Worse than normal26 readings, 1996–2024: rose from 43 Score to 43.9 Score.
Normal is zero · any amount = worse
Weakens · Relationship strength 0.28 (weight 0.4 × strength 0.7)
Observed
0.55 index score (0-1) · 0.26 below the normal line (2024)
Worse than normalAbove normal = better
Weakens · Relationship strength 0.28 (weight 0.4 × strength 0.69)
Observed
0.62 score from 0 to 1 · 0.25 below the normal line (2024)
Worse than normal125 readings, 1900–2024: rose from 0.37 score from 0 to 1 to 0.62 score from 0 to 1.
Above normal = better
All indicators on this path (4)
Weakens · Relationship strength 0.12 (weight 0.4 × strength 0.3)
Observed
42.5 index score (0-100) · 7.53 below the normal line (2025)
Worse than normalAbove normal = better
- FactIran’s execution tally remains high in the first months of Pezeshkian’s presidency
- weakensDriverProtection of Minority Rights
- strengthensIndicators (2)Having a say in government
impact weight 0.3 · Effect from 31 December 2024 · verified
Drug and protest-related executions often hit ethnic-minority provinces, a completed disparity path.
Strengthens · Relationship strength 0.14 (weight 0.3 × strength 0.45)
Observed
29.8% of population aged 16-65 years · 8.13 below the normal line (2023)
Worse than normalTwo readings: 30.2% of population aged 16-65 years (2021) and 29.8% of population aged 16-65 years (2023).
20212023 Above normal = better
Weakens · Relationship strength 0.14 (weight 0.3 × strength 0.45)
Observed
43.9 Score · 43.9 above the normal line (2024)
Worse than normal26 readings, 1996–2024: rose from 43 Score to 43.9 Score.
Normal is zero · any amount = worse
Evidence
The sources behind this fact and its verification state.
- 1.Amnesty International — Global: Recorded executions hit their highest figure since 2015 (April 2025)Amnesty International · High credibility · verified
- 2.UN special rapporteur on Iran — execution reporting 2024–2025United Nations human rights system · High credibility · verified
What the sources establish
United Nations human rights system carries the official instrument or communique. Amnesty International records the same dated act independently.
Established: 2024–25 continued high execution tally after inauguration, independently documented.
Not established: that he personally sentenced each prisoner, or a unique later crime-rate coefficient from the gallows.
The judiciary hanged. The Leader’s office outranked. UN rapporteurs counted.. A later repeal, court stay, or successor order would be a different Fact with a different date. That pair identifies Iran’s execution tally remains high in the first months of Pezeshkian’s presidency, not a later speech about Iran’s execution tally remains high in the first months of Pezeshkian’s presidency.
Co-authors and later implementers named in Context remain on the file. If a later repeal, stay, or successor instrument exists, it needs its own date and its own row. The contribution described on this Person row is limited to He did not gazette a moratorium. The judiciary hanged. The Leader’s office outranked. UN rapporteurs counted. That limit is the alternative to treating office-holding as authorship of every later series.
Causal path
How this event connects to drivers and indicators in the graph.
- ActorMasoud Pezeshkian
- contributed toFactIran’s execution tally remains high in the first months of Pezeshkian’s presidency
- strengthensDrivers (2)Judicial independence erosion (court capture)
- strengthensIndicatorRule of Law Gap from the Highest Governance Score
Cite this page
Factrail. (2026). Iran’s execution tally remains high in the first months of Pezeshkian’s presidency. Factrail. https://factrail.ai/facts/ir-executions-2024
https://factrail.ai/facts/ir-executions-2024
Accessed 16 October 2026.
By the Factrail desk · Method: how we source and score · Last reviewed
Dispute this factNamed here, or represent someone who is? Request a right of reply.