Clerical examiners at Poitiers allow Joan to proceed with the Valois forces
In 1429 a clerical examination at Poitiers authorised Joan’s participation with Charles’s forces. In the causal graph this event weakens Judicial independence erosion (court capture), a driver that strengthens Rule of Law Gap from the Highest Governance Score — an improving welfare path.
Read the full account
In 1429 a clerical examination at Poitiers authorised Joan’s participation with Charles’s forces.
Context
Armagnac clergy had an interest in a usable captain. That interest does not erase the examination. It also does not make Poitiers a supreme court over Rouen.
Joan of Arc is not the sole author of every later object, law, or museum label that uses the name. Shared work with courts, excavators, printers, spouses, officials, and later states does not erase a documented role, and it does not make an ancient person the signer of a twentieth-century statute.
Why it matters
High confidence that an examination occurred before Orléans; medium on the full Latin text as a 1429 file.
Poitiers is not the 1456 nullification. Split the courts.
Who was responsible
Contribution type and responsibility level for each recorded actor — not sole-author shorthand.
Joan of Arc
PersonDirect responsibility
responsibility level 0.35 · verified
She submitted to questioning. The Poitiers clerks wrote the clearance. Complex: later Rouen did not honour this filter.
What changed
Fact → Driver → Indicator. Relationship strength orders the paths; it is not the observed indicator movement.
- FactClerical examiners at Poitiers allow Joan to proceed with the Valois forces
- weakensDriverJudicial independence erosion (court capture)
- strengthensIndicators (4)Rule of Law Gap from the Highest Governance Score
impact weight 0.55 · Effect from 1 April 1429 · verified
A written clerical examination before arms is a small check on arbitrary spiritual-political accusation, later contradicted at Rouen.
- Better
Strengthens · Relationship strength 0.4 (weight 0.55 × strength 0.72)
Observed
43.9 Score · 43.9 above the normal line (2024)
Worse than normal26 readings, 1996–2024: rose from 43 Score to 43.9 Score.
Normal is zero · any amount = worse
Weakens · Relationship strength 0.39 (weight 0.55 × strength 0.7)
Observed
0.55 index score (0-1) · 0.26 below the normal line (2024)
Worse than normalAbove normal = better
Weakens · Relationship strength 0.38 (weight 0.55 × strength 0.69)
Observed
0.62 score from 0 to 1 · 0.25 below the normal line (2024)
Worse than normal125 readings, 1900–2024: rose from 0.37 score from 0 to 1 to 0.62 score from 0 to 1.
Above normal = better
All indicators on this path (4)
- Better
Weakens · Relationship strength 0.17 (weight 0.55 × strength 0.3)
Observed
42.5 index score (0-100) · 7.53 below the normal line (2025)
Worse than normalAbove normal = better
Evidence
The sources behind this fact and its verification state.
- 1.Britannica — Saint Joan of ArcEncyclopaedia Britannica · High credibility · verified
- 2.Archives nationales (France)Archives nationales · High credibility · verified
What the sources establish
Archives nationales as a French public-records portal and Britannica independently treat the Poitiers examination as part of the 1429 sequence.
Established: Poitiers clerical clearance in 1429. Not established: that this was an impartial modern trial, or that it legally bound English Rouen.
Causal path
How this event connects to drivers and indicators in the graph.
- ActorJoan of Arc
- contributed toFactClerical examiners at Poitiers allow Joan to proceed with the Valois forces
- weakensDriverJudicial independence erosion (court capture)
- strengthensIndicatorRule of Law Gap from the Highest Governance Score
Cite this page
Factrail. (2026). Clerical examiners at Poitiers allow Joan to proceed with the Valois forces. Factrail. https://factrail.ai/facts/joa-poitiers-1429
https://factrail.ai/facts/joa-poitiers-1429
Accessed 16 October 2026.
By the Factrail desk · Method: how we source and score · Last reviewed
Dispute this factNamed here, or represent someone who is? Request a right of reply.