Resurrection is published as a dated novel of courts, prisons, and conscience
In 1899 Resurrection appeared as a dated novel of jury service, prison stages, and moral responsibility. In the causal graph this event weakens Judicial independence erosion (court capture), a driver that strengthens Rule of Law Gap from the Highest Governance Score — an improving welfare path.
Read the full account
In 1899 Resurrection appeared as a dated novel of jury service, prison stages, and moral responsibility. Proceeds were linked to Dukhobor aid in the public story.
Context
Gutenberg and Tolstoy.ru independently carry the text.
Leo Tolstoy’s documented role is bounded by other offices and collaborators named in the sources below.
Conventional years are 1828–1910. Surviving public files are later museum pages, collected-works sites, and encyclopedias. Tolstoy did not typeset those later pages. Posthumous museums and editions are evidence, not acts.
Why it matters
Justice path via literature. High confidence on the 1899 publication.
Who was responsible
Contribution type and responsibility level for each recorded actor — not sole-author shorthand.
Leo Tolstoy
PersonDirect responsibility
responsibility level 0.4 · verified
He wrote the novel. Serial printers and later English houses issued it.
What changed
Fact → Driver → Indicator. Relationship strength orders the paths; it is not the observed indicator movement.
- FactResurrection is published as a dated novel of courts, prisons, and conscience
- weakensDriverJudicial independence erosion (court capture)
- strengthensIndicators (4)Rule of Law Gap from the Highest Governance Score
impact weight 0.5 · Effect from 1 January 1899 · verified
A dated court-and-prison novel increased public literary scrutiny of judicial and penal practice.
- Better
Strengthens · Relationship strength 0.36 (weight 0.5 × strength 0.72)
Observed
43.9 Score · 43.9 above the normal line (2024)
Worse than normal26 readings, 1996–2024: rose from 43 Score to 43.9 Score.
Normal is zero · any amount = worse
Weakens · Relationship strength 0.35 (weight 0.5 × strength 0.7)
Observed
0.55 index score (0-1) · 0.26 below the normal line (2024)
Worse than normalAbove normal = better
Weakens · Relationship strength 0.34 (weight 0.5 × strength 0.69)
Observed
0.62 score from 0 to 1 · 0.25 below the normal line (2024)
Worse than normal125 readings, 1900–2024: rose from 0.37 score from 0 to 1 to 0.62 score from 0 to 1.
Above normal = better
All indicators on this path (4)
- Better
Weakens · Relationship strength 0.15 (weight 0.5 × strength 0.3)
Observed
42.5 index score (0-100) · 7.53 below the normal line (2025)
Worse than normalAbove normal = better
Evidence
The sources behind this fact and its verification state.
- 1.Resurrection — public-domain English textProject Gutenberg · High credibility · verified
- 2.Tolstoy.ru — collected works and estate portalState Tolstoy Museum / Tolstoy.ru · High credibility · verified
What the sources establish
Tolstoy.ru and Gutenberg independently describe Resurrection as an 1899 public novel.
Established: Resurrection was published in 1899. Not established: a measured fall in wrongful convictions caused by the novel.
Leo Tolstoy did not file a later UNESCO form, a later Loeb colophon, or a later museum label as a personal act. Resurrection is not I Cannot Be Silent. Keep 1899 off the 1908 hanging letter. Resurrection is not I Cannot Be Silent. Keep 1899 off the 1908 hanging letter.
Causal path
How this event connects to drivers and indicators in the graph.
- ActorLeo Tolstoy
- contributed toFactResurrection is published as a dated novel of courts, prisons, and conscience
- weakensDriverJudicial independence erosion (court capture)
- strengthensIndicatorRule of Law Gap from the Highest Governance Score
Cite this page
Factrail. (2026). Resurrection is published as a dated novel of courts, prisons, and conscience. Factrail. https://factrail.ai/facts/lt-resurrection-1899
https://factrail.ai/facts/lt-resurrection-1899
Accessed 16 October 2026.
By the Factrail desk · Method: how we source and score · Last reviewed
Dispute this factNamed here, or represent someone who is? Request a right of reply.